You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by "Alex Karasulu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/07/09 15:53:32 UTC

[jira] Closed: (DIRSERVER-1103) New human readable normalizers need to intelligently figure out how to handle byte[]s (Review needed)

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Alex Karasulu closed DIRSERVER-1103.
------------------------------------


> New human readable normalizers need to intelligently figure out how to handle byte[]s (Review needed)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSERVER-1103
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1103
>             Project: Directory ApacheDS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.4
>            Reporter: Alex Karasulu
>            Assignee: Emmanuel Lecharny
>             Fix For: 1.5.2
>
>
> Looks like some of the new normalizers like this one do not know how to handle byte[]s.  This is very bad and compare operations will all fail because these normalizers must be passed a byte[] by the compare handling of the server.  Note that CompareContext uses a byte[] for the value being compared regardless of the human readibility of the attributeType's syntax.
> Example referred to above:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=595845
> Emmanuel can you take a look at this one for me or at least comment on it - I figure you know best the normalizer you added a while back.  But however I wanted to also ask if there is a better way to solve this than I did above.  I guess I can make the compare operation figure out what to give the normalizer.  Anyways I think we're going to be in a great possition soon when we do all this Value and ServerEntry stuff - these kinds of problems will never happen again.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.