You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> on 2013/05/21 18:39:01 UTC
Spring/Aries/Jetty versions for 3.0....
Curious what people think about the various versions for CXF 3.
Aries:
We current support 1.x and 0.3.x via a bunch of reflection stuff. If we drop support for 0.3.x, we can clean up some of that reflection code. However, we then lose support for Karaf 2.2.x.
Spring:
We current test with 3.1, but have some level of support for 2.5.x by calling a bunch of deprecated methods instead of the newer methods. Thoughts about at least dropping support for 2.5.x? Likely should move to 3.2 as our default, but keep support for 3.1?
Jetty:
We current test and ship 8.1, but have support for 7.x via a bunch of reflection code. Since even Karaf 2.3 uses 7.x, we likely need to keep this. :-(
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: Spring/Aries/Jetty versions for 3.0....
Posted by Willem jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
It sounds good, here is my +1.
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> Curious what people think about the various versions for CXF 3.
>
> Aries:
> We current support 1.x and 0.3.x via a bunch of reflection stuff. If we drop support for 0.3.x, we can clean up some of that reflection code. However, we then lose support for Karaf 2.2.x.
>
> Spring:
> We current test with 3.1, but have some level of support for 2.5.x by calling a bunch of deprecated methods instead of the newer methods. Thoughts about at least dropping support for 2.5.x? Likely should move to 3.2 as our default, but keep support for 3.1?
>
> Jetty:
> We current test and ship 8.1, but have support for 7.x via a bunch of reflection code. Since even Karaf 2.3 uses 7.x, we likely need to keep this. :-(
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: Spring/Aries/Jetty versions for 3.0....
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dan,
For CXF 3,
+1 to drop aries 0.3.x support
+1 to drop spring 2.5.x support and use spring 3.2 by default but still support spring 3.1
and yeah, we better still support jetty 7.x in CXF 3
Thanks
－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: @Freeman小屋
www.camelone.org : The open source integration conference:
On 2013-5-22, at 上午12:39, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> Curious what people think about the various versions for CXF 3.
>
> Aries:
> We current support 1.x and 0.3.x via a bunch of reflection stuff. If we drop support for 0.3.x, we can clean up some of that reflection code. However, we then lose support for Karaf 2.2.x.
>
> Spring:
> We current test with 3.1, but have some level of support for 2.5.x by calling a bunch of deprecated methods instead of the newer methods. Thoughts about at least dropping support for 2.5.x? Likely should move to 3.2 as our default, but keep support for 3.1?
>
> Jetty:
> We current test and ship 8.1, but have support for 7.x via a bunch of reflection code. Since even Karaf 2.3 uses 7.x, we likely need to keep this. :-(
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>