You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@spamassassin.apache.org on 2021/10/06 10:21:43 UTC

[Bug 7935] New: Arc-Authentication-Results support

https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7935

            Bug ID: 7935
           Summary: Arc-Authentication-Results support
           Product: Spamassassin
           Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Libraries
          Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
          Reporter: giovanni@paclan.it
  Target Milestone: Undefined

Created attachment 5756
  --> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5756&action=edit
Arc-Authentication-Results header check

SpamAssassin can read EnvelopeFrom from Authentication-Results but, in some
emails this info is stored in Arc-Authentication-Results header.
The attached patch fixes it and it's a first step towards Arc support.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7935] Arc-Authentication-Results support

Posted by bu...@spamassassin.apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7935

Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.eu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |me@junc.eu

--- Comment #2 from Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.eu> ---
(In reply to dbuergin from comment #1)
> I am curious to know why ARC-Authentication-Results (RFC 8617) and
> Authentication-Results (RFC 8601) headers should be conflated like this.
> I think that on my server I would certainly like to make use of
> Authentication-Results, but ARC-Authentication-Results not so much.
> 
> Wouldn’t it be better to start with a separate plugin for ARC support?

Mail::DKIM have ARC support already

Mail::DMARC have no knowledgde imho of ARC, so i belive in spamassassin its
best to use Mail::DKIM with ARC tests, while the long term goes for Mail::DMARC
ARC testing and policy

any step forward is good

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7935] Arc-Authentication-Results support

Posted by bu...@spamassassin.apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7935

Giovanni Bechis <gi...@paclan.it> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |giovanni@paclan.it

--- Comment #3 from Giovanni Bechis <gi...@paclan.it> ---
Created attachment 5787
  --> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5787&action=edit
ARC support for DKIM.pm

Add check_arc_signed() and check_arc_valid() subs to verify ARC signatures.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7935] Arc-Authentication-Results support

Posted by bu...@spamassassin.apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7935

Henrik Krohns <ap...@hege.li> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |apache@hege.li

--- Comment #4 from Henrik Krohns <ap...@hege.li> ---
Dunno anything about ARC, but from a quick look nothing looks bad in the diff?
Just missing if can(has_arc) feature check.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7935] Arc-Authentication-Results support

Posted by bu...@spamassassin.apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7935

Matija Nalis <mn...@voyager.hr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mnalis-sabug@voyager.hr

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7935] Arc-Authentication-Results support

Posted by bu...@spamassassin.apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7935

Giovanni Bechis <gi...@paclan.it> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |suse+spamassassin@tower-net
                   |                            |.de

--- Comment #6 from Giovanni Bechis <gi...@paclan.it> ---
*** Bug 7642 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7935] Arc-Authentication-Results support

Posted by bu...@spamassassin.apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7935

Giovanni Bechis <gi...@paclan.it> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Giovanni Bechis <gi...@paclan.it> ---
Sending        MANIFEST
Sending        lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/DKIM.pm
Adding         t/arc.t
Adding         t/data/dkim/arc
Adding         t/data/dkim/arc/ko01.eml
Adding         t/data/dkim/arc/ok01.eml
Transmitting file data .....done
Committing transaction...
Committed revision 1901719.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 7935] Arc-Authentication-Results support

Posted by bu...@spamassassin.apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7935

--- Comment #1 from dbuergin@gluet.ch ---
I am curious to know why ARC-Authentication-Results (RFC 8617) and
Authentication-Results (RFC 8601) headers should be conflated like this.
I think that on my server I would certainly like to make use of
Authentication-Results, but ARC-Authentication-Results not so much.

Wouldn’t it be better to start with a separate plugin for ARC support?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.