You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mime4j-dev@james.apache.org by Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org> on 2009/02/01 15:26:51 UTC
Re: Remove deprecated classes?
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 16:20 +0100, Markus Wiederkehr wrote:
> Mime4j has undergone some drastic changes since 0.5. Is it even worst
> keeping the classes that have been deprecated?
>
> The classes in question are AbstractBody, TempFile, TempStorage,
> TempPath and SimpleTempStorage.
>
> Markus
+1 to removing deprecated code
Oleg
Re: Remove deprecated classes?
Posted by Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org>.
+1
Norman
2009/2/1 Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 16:20 +0100, Markus Wiederkehr wrote:
>>> Mime4j has undergone some drastic changes since 0.5. Is it even worst
>>> keeping the classes that have been deprecated?
>>>
>>> The classes in question are AbstractBody, TempFile, TempStorage,
>>> TempPath and SimpleTempStorage.
>>>
>>> Markus
>>
>> +1 to removing deprecated code
>
> +1
>
> please add a 0.6 section to the top of RELEASE_NOTES.txt and note the
> classes which have been removed and suggest an upgrade path
>
> - robert
>
Re: Remove deprecated classes?
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 16:20 +0100, Markus Wiederkehr wrote:
>> Mime4j has undergone some drastic changes since 0.5. Is it even worst
>> keeping the classes that have been deprecated?
>>
>> The classes in question are AbstractBody, TempFile, TempStorage,
>> TempPath and SimpleTempStorage.
>>
>> Markus
>
> +1 to removing deprecated code
+1
please add a 0.6 section to the top of RELEASE_NOTES.txt and note the
classes which have been removed and suggest an upgrade path
- robert