You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Plüm,
Rüdiger,
Vodafone Group <ru...@vodafone.com> on 2012/03/28 17:49:14 UTC
RE: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Konstantin Kolinko
> Sent: Mittwoch, 28. März 2012 17:05
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
>
> 2012/3/28 Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
> > Are there any plans to backport r723889
> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=723889,
> > Add the ability to configure a job queue size, and a timeout for how
> long we want to try to add something
> > to the queue.) to Tomcat 6?
> >
> > Having the MaxQueueSize attribute available for executors in Tomcat 6
> would be quite handy for me.
> >
>
> I do not see anything obvious against backporting it.
>
>
> If you really need it, I suggest you to create a patch against current
> tc6.0.x code and attach it to a new Bugzilla issue. Instructions are
> at [1], but probably you already know them.
Thanks. Done:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52996
Regards
Rüdiger
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
RE: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
Posted by Plüm,
Rüdiger,
Vodafone Group <ru...@vodafone.com>.
Ping?
Any update?
Regards
Rüdiger
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
> [mailto:ruediger.pluem@vodafone.com]
> Sent: Freitag, 27. April 2012 14:38
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: RE: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Filip Hanik Mailing Lists [mailto:devlists@hanik.com]
> > Sent: Montag, 23. April 2012 17:37
> > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > Subject: Re: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Rüdiger Plüm, Vodafone Group" <ru...@vodafone.com>
> >
> > >
> > > Ok. As far as I can see the new method
> > >
> > > execute(Runnable command, long timeout, TimeUnit unit);
> > >
> > > of the Executor interface is implemented but not used.
> > > Would it still be an acceptable backport if
> > >
> > > 1. The changes to the Executor interface are removed from the patch
> > > 2. The implementation of execute(Runnable command, long timeout,
> > > TimeUnit unit); is removed from the patch.
> > >
> > > If yes I can update the patch.
> >
> > Yes
>
> Done.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52996
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28687
>
> Regards
>
> Rüdiger
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
RE: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
Posted by Plüm,
Rüdiger,
Vodafone Group <ru...@vodafone.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Filip Hanik Mailing Lists [mailto:devlists@hanik.com]
> Sent: Montag, 23. April 2012 17:37
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rüdiger Plüm, Vodafone Group" <ru...@vodafone.com>
>
> >
> > Ok. As far as I can see the new method
> >
> > execute(Runnable command, long timeout, TimeUnit unit);
> >
> > of the Executor interface is implemented but not used.
> > Would it still be an acceptable backport if
> >
> > 1. The changes to the Executor interface are removed from the patch
> > 2. The implementation of execute(Runnable command, long timeout,
> > TimeUnit unit); is removed from the patch.
> >
> > If yes I can update the patch.
>
> Yes
Done.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52996
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28687
Regards
Rüdiger
RE: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
Posted by Plüm,
Rüdiger,
Vodafone Group <ru...@vodafone.com>.
Ping?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
> [mailto:ruediger.pluem@vodafone.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2012 17:43
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: RE: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jean-frederic clere > Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2012 17:33
> > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > Subject: Re: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
> >
> > On 04/11/2012 01:34 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:jfclere@gmail.com]
> > >> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2012 12:56
> > >> To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
> > >>
> > >> On 04/11/2012 09:36 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
> > >>> Ping? Some sponsor for the tc6.0 status file for the below?
> > >>
> > >> Won't break an application using their own executor that
> implements
> > the
> > >> StandardExecutor?
> > >
> > > You mean because of the changed Executor interface?
> >
> > Yep.
>
> Ok. As far as I can see the new method
>
> execute(Runnable command, long timeout, TimeUnit unit);
>
> of the Executor interface is implemented but not used.
> Would it still be an acceptable backport if
>
> 1. The changes to the Executor interface are removed from the patch
> 2. The implementation of execute(Runnable command, long timeout,
> TimeUnit unit); is removed from the patch.
>
> If yes I can update the patch.
>
> Regards
>
> Rüdiger
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
Posted by Filip Hanik Mailing Lists <de...@hanik.com>.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rüdiger Plüm, Vodafone Group" <ru...@vodafone.com>
>
> Ok. As far as I can see the new method
>
> execute(Runnable command, long timeout, TimeUnit unit);
>
> of the Executor interface is implemented but not used.
> Would it still be an acceptable backport if
>
> 1. The changes to the Executor interface are removed from the patch
> 2. The implementation of execute(Runnable command, long timeout,
> TimeUnit unit); is removed from the patch.
>
> If yes I can update the patch.
Yes
>
> Regards
>
> Rüdiger
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
RE: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
Posted by Plüm,
Rüdiger,
Vodafone Group <ru...@vodafone.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jean-frederic clere > Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2012 17:33
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
>
> On 04/11/2012 01:34 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:jfclere@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2012 12:56
> >> To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
> >>
> >> On 04/11/2012 09:36 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
> >>> Ping? Some sponsor for the tc6.0 status file for the below?
> >>
> >> Won't break an application using their own executor that implements
> the
> >> StandardExecutor?
> >
> > You mean because of the changed Executor interface?
>
> Yep.
Ok. As far as I can see the new method
execute(Runnable command, long timeout, TimeUnit unit);
of the Executor interface is implemented but not used.
Would it still be an acceptable backport if
1. The changes to the Executor interface are removed from the patch
2. The implementation of execute(Runnable command, long timeout, TimeUnit unit); is removed from the patch.
If yes I can update the patch.
Regards
Rüdiger
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>.
On 04/11/2012 01:34 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:jfclere@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2012 12:56
>> To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
>>
>> On 04/11/2012 09:36 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
>>> Ping? Some sponsor for the tc6.0 status file for the below?
>>
>> Won't break an application using their own executor that implements the
>> StandardExecutor?
>
> You mean because of the changed Executor interface?
Yep.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
RE: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
Posted by Plüm,
Rüdiger,
Vodafone Group <ru...@vodafone.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:jfclere@gmail.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2012 12:56
> To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
>
> On 04/11/2012 09:36 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
> > Ping? Some sponsor for the tc6.0 status file for the below?
>
> Won't break an application using their own executor that implements the
> StandardExecutor?
You mean because of the changed Executor interface?
Regards
Rüdiger
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>.
On 04/11/2012 09:36 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
> Ping? Some sponsor for the tc6.0 status file for the below?
Won't break an application using their own executor that implements the
StandardExecutor?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
RE: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
Posted by Plüm,
Rüdiger,
Vodafone Group <ru...@vodafone.com>.
Ping? Some sponsor for the tc6.0 status file for the below?
Regards
Rüdiger
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
> [mailto:]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 28. März 2012 17:49
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: RE: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Konstantin Kolinko
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 28. März 2012 17:05
> > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > Subject: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6
> >
> > 2012/3/28 Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
> > > Are there any plans to backport r723889
> > (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=723889,
> > > Add the ability to configure a job queue size, and a timeout for
> how
> > long we want to try to add something
> > > to the queue.) to Tomcat 6?
> > >
> > > Having the MaxQueueSize attribute available for executors in Tomcat
> 6
> > would be quite handy for me.
> > >
> >
> > I do not see anything obvious against backporting it.
> >
> >
> > If you really need it, I suggest you to create a patch against
> current
> > tc6.0.x code and attach it to a new Bugzilla issue. Instructions are
> > at [1], but probably you already know them.
>
> Thanks. Done:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52996
>
> Regards
>
> Rüdiger
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org