You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> on 2007/03/19 21:21:47 UTC
Modifying the dayTrader tree
I talked with David J and Chris B about taking DT trunk and moving it
to branches/old20 and promoting branches/ejb3 to trunk. Any
objections?
Re: Modifying the dayTrader tree
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Jimmy cracked corn then.
On Mar 19, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Actually, if old20 is not going to live long... then I don't care ;-)
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Mar 19, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Why old20? Why not just make ejb3 some new version, like 3.0 or
>> something, and then make the current trunk branches/2.0 ?
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Mar 19, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>
>>> I talked with David J and Chris B about taking DT trunk and
>>> moving it to branches/old20 and promoting branches/ejb3 to
>>> trunk. Any objections?
>>
>
>
Re: Modifying the dayTrader tree
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Actually, if old20 is not going to live long... then I don't care ;-)
--jason
On Mar 19, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Why old20? Why not just make ejb3 some new version, like 3.0 or
> something, and then make the current trunk branches/2.0 ?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Mar 19, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> I talked with David J and Chris B about taking DT trunk and moving
>> it to branches/old20 and promoting branches/ejb3 to trunk. Any
>> objections?
>
Re: Modifying the dayTrader tree
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Why old20? Why not just make ejb3 some new version, like 3.0 or
something, and then make the current trunk branches/2.0 ?
--jason
On Mar 19, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I talked with David J and Chris B about taking DT trunk and moving
> it to branches/old20 and promoting branches/ejb3 to trunk. Any
> objections?