You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by "M.Lewis" <ca...@cajuninc.com> on 2006/10/04 05:59:40 UTC
Score=x ?
I've seen a couple of mails come through lately with score=x. Perhaps
there have been some coming in all along like that and I haven't noticed it.
What does score=x mean?
Thanks,
Mike
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cajuninc.com
X-Spam-Score: -
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[]
Received: from moe.cajuninc.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (moe.cajuninc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id uJfhQbv7NXdm for <ca...@localhost.cajuninc.com>;
Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:58:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from moe.cajuninc.com (moe.cajuninc.com [127.0.0.1])
by moe.cajuninc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A602F640189
for <ca...@localhost>; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:58:07 -0500 (EST)
--
IBM: Insultingly Boring Microcomputers
22:55:01 up 13 days, 4:29, 8 users, load average: 0.51, 0.27, 0.20
Linux Registered User #241685 http://counter.li.org
Re: Score=x ?
Posted by "M.Lewis" <ca...@cajuninc.com>.
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Wed, October 4, 2006 05:59, M.Lewis wrote:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[]
>
> check amavisd.conf for $sa_mail_body_size_limit is highter then the mail size in this
> mail, if it is amavisd disabled scanning of this mail
>
Thanks Benny. I seriously doubt that was it as the message in question
was 268KB. However I will check it out.
Thank you very much!
Mike
--
Software engineer: One who engineers others into writing the code for
him/her.
02:35:01 up 2:18, 7 users, load average: 0.46, 0.31, 0.24
Linux Registered User #241685 http://counter.li.org
Re: Score=x ?
Posted by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.org>.
On Wed, October 4, 2006 09:18, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Wed, October 4, 2006 05:59, M.Lewis wrote:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[]
> check amavisd.conf for $sa_mail_body_size_limit is highter then the mail size in this
> mail, if it is amavisd disabled scanning of this mail
sorry its lower, not highter size, but this is the only time i have seen score=x with
amavisd, you can raise the size limit so you scan them aswell, just don't set the limit to
high, but still high enough to not let spam through
--
"This message was sent using 100% recycled spam mails."
Re: Score=x ?
Posted by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.org>.
On Wed, October 4, 2006 05:59, M.Lewis wrote:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[]
check amavisd.conf for $sa_mail_body_size_limit is highter then the mail size in this
mail, if it is amavisd disabled scanning of this mail
--
"This message was sent using 100% recycled spam mails."
Re: Score=x ?
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:59:40PM -0500, M.Lewis wrote:
> I've seen a couple of mails come through lately with score=x. Perhaps
> there have been some coming in all along like that and I haven't noticed it.
>
> What does score=x mean?
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[]
> Received: from moe.cajuninc.com ([127.0.0.1])
> by localhost (moe.cajuninc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
[...]
amavis is doing the markup, so I would ask them.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
fail("Language designer not persuaded"); # :-)
-- Larry Wall in <20...@wall.org>
Re: Score=x ?
Posted by "M.Lewis" <ca...@cajuninc.com>.
Matt Kettler wrote:
> That's an amavis thing, but I presume it means there is no score (ie: SA
> did not completely analyze the message, so no score was computed).
>
> This could mean message was not fed to spamassassin (due to hard
> whitelist or bypass_spam_checks), or amavis timed-out the spamassassin
> process (which is very likely to happen if your sa_timeout is less than
> 120, and you are using bayes).
>
> That said, you'd have to ask someone who knows amavisd-new. I don't. But
> that's my best educated guess. I hope it helps some.
>
Thanks Matt. You could be right. I don't know. I will ask on Amavis list
as Theo suggested.
M
>
> M.Lewis wrote:
>> I've seen a couple of mails come through lately with score=x. Perhaps
>> there have been some coming in all along like that and I haven't
>> noticed it.
>>
>> What does score=x mean?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cajuninc.com
>> X-Spam-Score: -
>> X-Spam-Level:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[]
>> Received: from moe.cajuninc.com ([127.0.0.1])
>> by localhost (moe.cajuninc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
>> with ESMTP id uJfhQbv7NXdm for <ca...@localhost.cajuninc.com>;
>> Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:58:26 -0500 (EST)
>> Received: from moe.cajuninc.com (moe.cajuninc.com [127.0.0.1])
>> by moe.cajuninc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A602F640189
>> for <ca...@localhost>; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:58:07 -0500 (EST)
>>
>
--
As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error. -
Weisert
23:25:01 up 13 days, 4:59, 8 users, load average: 0.07, 0.24, 0.39
Linux Registered User #241685 http://counter.li.org
Re: Score=x ?
Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@verizon.net>.
That's an amavis thing, but I presume it means there is no score (ie: SA
did not completely analyze the message, so no score was computed).
This could mean message was not fed to spamassassin (due to hard
whitelist or bypass_spam_checks), or amavis timed-out the spamassassin
process (which is very likely to happen if your sa_timeout is less than
120, and you are using bayes).
That said, you'd have to ask someone who knows amavisd-new. I don't. But
that's my best educated guess. I hope it helps some.
M.Lewis wrote:
>
> I've seen a couple of mails come through lately with score=x. Perhaps
> there have been some coming in all along like that and I haven't
> noticed it.
>
> What does score=x mean?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
>
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cajuninc.com
> X-Spam-Score: -
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[]
> Received: from moe.cajuninc.com ([127.0.0.1])
> by localhost (moe.cajuninc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
> with ESMTP id uJfhQbv7NXdm for <ca...@localhost.cajuninc.com>;
> Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:58:26 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from moe.cajuninc.com (moe.cajuninc.com [127.0.0.1])
> by moe.cajuninc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A602F640189
> for <ca...@localhost>; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:58:07 -0500 (EST)
>