You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Ufuk Celebi (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/07/24 12:17:38 UTC
[jira] [Created] (FLINK-1034) Inconsistent naming of DataSet
reduceGroup and GroupReduceFunction
Ufuk Celebi created FLINK-1034:
----------------------------------
Summary: Inconsistent naming of DataSet reduceGroup and GroupReduceFunction
Key: FLINK-1034
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1034
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java API
Reporter: Ufuk Celebi
Priority: Trivial
I don't know if it is on purpose or not, but I found it to be inconsistent and sometimes also confusing:
Why not
{code:java}
input.groupReduce(new GroupReduceFunction() {...})
{code}
instead of the current
{code:java}
input.reduceGroup(new GroupReduceFunction() {...})
{code}
I think it's the same line of thinking, which results in overriding a {{reduce}} method in {{GroupReduceFunction}} instead of a {{groupReduce}} method.
Is there a nice way to unify this?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)