You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Carl Yeksigian (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/01/13 17:42:39 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-10540) RangeAwareCompaction

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15096503#comment-15096503 ] 

Carl Yeksigian commented on CASSANDRA-10540:
--------------------------------------------

[~krummas]: can you rebase this and rerun the tests now that CASSANDRA-6696 is in?

> RangeAwareCompaction
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10540
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10540
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Marcus Eriksson
>            Assignee: Marcus Eriksson
>             Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> Broken out from CASSANDRA-6696, we should split sstables based on ranges during compaction.
> Requirements;
> * dont create tiny sstables - keep them bunched together until a single vnode is big enough (configurable how big that is)
> * make it possible to run existing compaction strategies on the per-range sstables
> We should probably add a global compaction strategy parameter that states whether this should be enabled or not.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)