You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/04/07 18:14:33 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2379) TermRangeQuery &
FieldCacheRangeFilter should accepts BytesRef
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2379.
----------------------------------------
Resolution: Duplicate
Woops -- dup of LUCENE-2364.
> TermRangeQuery & FieldCacheRangeFilter should accepts BytesRef
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2379
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2379
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 3.1
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 3.1
>
>
> With flex, a term is a byte[] (BytesRef) not a String... we need to push this "up the search stack".
> TermRangeQuery / FieldCacheRangeFilter.newStringRange now take a String for the upper/lower bounds, but that should be deprecated in favor of BytesRef (a BytesRef can be created from a CharSequence, encoding the chars as UTF8).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org