You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@creadur.apache.org by "Dan Dumont (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/01/19 23:49:34 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (RAT-190) False negatives(?) in apache rat
license checking
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14283118#comment-14283118 ]
Dan Dumont commented on RAT-190:
--------------------------------
>java -version
java version "1.7.0_55"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_55-b13)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.55-b03, mixed mode)
> False negatives(?) in apache rat license checking
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RAT-190
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-190
> Project: Apache Rat
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8, 0.11
> Reporter: Dan Dumont
>
> We're using rat to enforce our internal copyright on all of our source files.
> We're seeing it missing files that should be flagged. Here's part of our pom:
> <licenses>
> <license implementation="org.apache.rat.analysis.license.SimplePatternBasedLicense">
> <licenseFamilyCategory>IBMCL</licenseFamilyCategory>
> <licenseFamilyName>IBM Copyright</licenseFamilyName>
> <notes></notes>
> <patterns>
> <pattern>Copyright IBM Corp. 2015</pattern>
> <pattern>Copyright IBM Corp. 2014, 2015</pattern>
> <pattern>Copyright IBM Corp. 2013, 2015</pattern>
> </patterns>
> </license>
> </licenses>
> <licenseFamilies>
> <licenseFamily implementation="org.apache.rat.license.SimpleLicenseFamily">
> <familyName>IBM Copyright</familyName>
> </licenseFamily>
> </licenseFamilies>
> The file in question is "included" as reported by running with debug output... but the file's copyright is:
> /* Copyright IBM Corp. 2014 All Rights Reserved. */
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)