You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> on 2010/11/05 07:17:55 UTC
[VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.2 (candidate 0)
I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.2. This is a bug fix
release addressing twenty-six issues (eight critical) -- see the
release notes for details.
*** Please download, test and VOTE before the
*** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, November 9.***
http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.2-candidate-0/
Should we release this?
Patrick
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.2 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
Just a reminder for those of you new to the community. Anyone can test
the release candidate and vote or provide feedback. We'd appreciate
you finding any issues that need to be found _now_ rather than after
the RC is released officially. It takes 3 or more +1 votes from PMC
members (and a min time of 72 biz hrs) for the release to be accepted
as the official 3.3.2 Apache ZooKeeper release.
Thanks,
Patrick
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 based on my testing. Included testing various cluster sizes. 9
> server cluster I manually verified that killing/restarting servers
> worked properly, including going below majority count and then
> restarting some servers. Clients maintained connectivity and recovered
> sessions correctly.
>
> LGTM.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>> +1 for the release.
>>
>> Ran ant test and a couple of smoke tests. Create znodes and shutdown
>> zookeeper servers to test durability. Deleted znodes to make sure they are
>> deleted. Shot down servers one at a time to confirm correct behavior.
>>
>> Thanks
>> mahadev
>>
>>
>> On 11/4/10 11:17 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.2. This is a bug fix
>>> release addressing twenty-six issues (eight critical) -- see the
>>> release notes for details.
>>>
>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, November 9.***
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.2-candidate-0/
>>>
>>> Should we release this?
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.2 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
+1 based on my testing. Included testing various cluster sizes. 9
server cluster I manually verified that killing/restarting servers
worked properly, including going below majority count and then
restarting some servers. Clients maintained connectivity and recovered
sessions correctly.
LGTM.
Patrick
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> +1 for the release.
>
> Ran ant test and a couple of smoke tests. Create znodes and shutdown
> zookeeper servers to test durability. Deleted znodes to make sure they are
> deleted. Shot down servers one at a time to confirm correct behavior.
>
> Thanks
> mahadev
>
>
> On 11/4/10 11:17 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.2. This is a bug fix
>> release addressing twenty-six issues (eight critical) -- see the
>> release notes for details.
>>
>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, November 9.***
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.2-candidate-0/
>>
>> Should we release this?
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.2 (candidate 0)
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
With 6 +1's (3 PMC) and no -1's the vote passes. I'm working to
publish the release and will send announcements as soon as that's
done.
Patrick
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> I put it up on a cluster under hbase and ran loads against it over
> last few hours. Nothing untoward in logs. Played around w/ zkcli.
> It seems to behaving same as 3.3.1.
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Henry Robinson <he...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Python looks good.
>>
>> On 10 November 2010 14:51, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1.
>>>
>>> I ran my benchmark test on the release candidate for one hour, and got
>>> similar numbers as 3.3.0.
>>>
>>> --Michi
>>>
>>> On 11/10/10 11:09 AM, "Mahadev Konar" <ma...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > +1 for the release.
>>> >
>>> > Ran ant test and a couple of smoke tests. Create znodes and shutdown
>>> > zookeeper servers to test durability. Deleted znodes to make sure they
>>> are
>>> > deleted. Shot down servers one at a time to confirm correct behavior.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > mahadev
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 11/4/10 11:17 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.2. This is a bug fix
>>> >> release addressing twenty-six issues (eight critical) -- see the
>>> >> release notes for details.
>>> >>
>>> >> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>> >> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, November 9.***
>>> >>
>>> >> http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.2-candidate-0/
>>> >>
>>> >> Should we release this?
>>> >>
>>> >> Patrick
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Henry Robinson
>> Software Engineer
>> Cloudera
>> 415-994-6679
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.2 (candidate 0)
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
+1
I put it up on a cluster under hbase and ran loads against it over
last few hours. Nothing untoward in logs. Played around w/ zkcli.
It seems to behaving same as 3.3.1.
St.Ack
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Henry Robinson <he...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Python looks good.
>
> On 10 November 2010 14:51, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>
>> +1.
>>
>> I ran my benchmark test on the release candidate for one hour, and got
>> similar numbers as 3.3.0.
>>
>> --Michi
>>
>> On 11/10/10 11:09 AM, "Mahadev Konar" <ma...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for the release.
>> >
>> > Ran ant test and a couple of smoke tests. Create znodes and shutdown
>> > zookeeper servers to test durability. Deleted znodes to make sure they
>> are
>> > deleted. Shot down servers one at a time to confirm correct behavior.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > mahadev
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/4/10 11:17 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.2. This is a bug fix
>> >> release addressing twenty-six issues (eight critical) -- see the
>> >> release notes for details.
>> >>
>> >> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> >> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, November 9.***
>> >>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.2-candidate-0/
>> >>
>> >> Should we release this?
>> >>
>> >> Patrick
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Henry Robinson
> Software Engineer
> Cloudera
> 415-994-6679
>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.2 (candidate 0)
Posted by Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo-inc.com>.
+1, unit tests pass. Also ran a few manual tests. I must say that in
one of the computers I tried, AsyncHammerTest fails, and the error
message I get is that there are no tests. Discussing with Pat, we
ended up concluding that it is most likely a configuration problem. I
don't think that's a reason to -1 it, though.
-Flavio
On Nov 11, 2010, at 12:24 AM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> +1
>
> Python looks good.
>
> On 10 November 2010 14:51, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@yahoo-inc.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1.
>>
>> I ran my benchmark test on the release candidate for one hour, and
>> got
>> similar numbers as 3.3.0.
>>
>> --Michi
>>
>> On 11/10/10 11:09 AM, "Mahadev Konar" <ma...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for the release.
>>>
>>> Ran ant test and a couple of smoke tests. Create znodes and shutdown
>>> zookeeper servers to test durability. Deleted znodes to make sure
>>> they
>> are
>>> deleted. Shot down servers one at a time to confirm correct
>>> behavior.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> mahadev
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/4/10 11:17 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.2. This is a bug
>>>> fix
>>>> release addressing twenty-six issues (eight critical) -- see the
>>>> release notes for details.
>>>>
>>>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>>> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, November 9.***
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.2-candidate-0/
>>>>
>>>> Should we release this?
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Henry Robinson
> Software Engineer
> Cloudera
> 415-994-6679
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
fpj@yahoo-inc.com
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300 fax (408) 349 3301
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.2 (candidate 0)
Posted by Henry Robinson <he...@cloudera.com>.
+1
Python looks good.
On 10 November 2010 14:51, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> +1.
>
> I ran my benchmark test on the release candidate for one hour, and got
> similar numbers as 3.3.0.
>
> --Michi
>
> On 11/10/10 11:09 AM, "Mahadev Konar" <ma...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for the release.
> >
> > Ran ant test and a couple of smoke tests. Create znodes and shutdown
> > zookeeper servers to test durability. Deleted znodes to make sure they
> are
> > deleted. Shot down servers one at a time to confirm correct behavior.
> >
> > Thanks
> > mahadev
> >
> >
> > On 11/4/10 11:17 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.2. This is a bug fix
> >> release addressing twenty-six issues (eight critical) -- see the
> >> release notes for details.
> >>
> >> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> >> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, November 9.***
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.2-candidate-0/
> >>
> >> Should we release this?
> >>
> >> Patrick
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
--
Henry Robinson
Software Engineer
Cloudera
415-994-6679
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.2 (candidate 0)
Posted by Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@yahoo-inc.com>.
+1.
I ran my benchmark test on the release candidate for one hour, and got
similar numbers as 3.3.0.
--Michi
On 11/10/10 11:09 AM, "Mahadev Konar" <ma...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> +1 for the release.
>
> Ran ant test and a couple of smoke tests. Create znodes and shutdown
> zookeeper servers to test durability. Deleted znodes to make sure they are
> deleted. Shot down servers one at a time to confirm correct behavior.
>
> Thanks
> mahadev
>
>
> On 11/4/10 11:17 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.2. This is a bug fix
>> release addressing twenty-six issues (eight critical) -- see the
>> release notes for details.
>>
>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, November 9.***
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.2-candidate-0/
>>
>> Should we release this?
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.3.2 (candidate 0)
Posted by Mahadev Konar <ma...@yahoo-inc.com>.
+1 for the release.
Ran ant test and a couple of smoke tests. Create znodes and shutdown
zookeeper servers to test durability. Deleted znodes to make sure they are
deleted. Shot down servers one at a time to confirm correct behavior.
Thanks
mahadev
On 11/4/10 11:17 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.2. This is a bug fix
> release addressing twenty-six issues (eight critical) -- see the
> release notes for details.
>
> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, November 9.***
>
> http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.2-candidate-0/
>
> Should we release this?
>
> Patrick
>