You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org> on 2002/01/17 00:10:20 UTC

[VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Hi,

I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with
the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:

<ballot>
[ ] +1 Make the release
[ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
[ ] -0 Bad idea
[ ] -1 No, because:



</ballot>

The release process will be the following:
- Tag j-t-c/webapp with "tomcat_402_b2"
- Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the
changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle
webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote)
- Tag j-t-c/jk with "tomcat_402_b2" (it's fine to also tag it with something
else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in)
- Tag j-t-c/util with "tomcat_402_b2"
- Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update
the binaries in the main Tomcat tree
- Tag the Tomcat tree with "tomcat_402_b2"
- Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries
- Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp
- Build and upload the RPMs

Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and
should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the
JK developers :)

Thanks,
Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@fujitsu-siemens.com>.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with
> the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
> 
> <ballot>
> [X] +1 Make the release
> [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:
> 
> </ballot>
> 
> The release process will be the following:
> - Tag j-t-c/webapp with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the
> changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle
> webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote)

Why not doing it now? - I have only fixed things in j-t-c - 
I will port back the _change_ in TC to j-t-c.

> - Tag j-t-c/jk with "tomcat_402_b2" (it's fine to also tag it with something
> else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in)
> - Tag j-t-c/util with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update
> the binaries in the main Tomcat tree
> - Tag the Tomcat tree with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries
> - Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp
> - Build and upload the RPMs
> 
> Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and
> should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the
> JK developers :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Remy
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Posted by Andy Armstrong <an...@tagish.com>.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with
> the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
> 
> <ballot>
> [X] +1 Make the release
> [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:
> 
> </ballot>
> 
> The release process will be the following:
> - Tag j-t-c/webapp with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the
> changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle
> webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote)
> - Tag j-t-c/jk with "tomcat_402_b2" (it's fine to also tag it with something
> else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in)
> - Tag j-t-c/util with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update
> the binaries in the main Tomcat tree
> - Tag the Tomcat tree with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries
> - Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp
> - Build and upload the RPMs
> 
> Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and
> should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the
> JK developers :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Remy
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

-- 
Andy Armstrong, Tagish

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Posted by Bojan Smojver <bo...@binarix.com>.
Remy Maucherat wrote:


> I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with
> the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
> 
> <ballot>
> [ ] +1 Make the release
> [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:

 > </ballot>

Bojan


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Posted by Amy Roh <am...@apache.org>.
>
> [X] +1 Make the release
> [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:

Amy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Posted by Cavan Morris <ca...@worldnet.att.net>.
Is there a plan to build native webapp for Apache 2.0 as well as 1.3?

> 
> <ballot>
> [ ] +1 Make the release
> [X ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:
> 
> 
> 
> </ballot>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Posted by Bill Barker <wb...@wilshire.com>.
> <ballot>
> [ ] +1 Make the release
> [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:
> 
> 
> 
> </ballot>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Posted by Bip Thelin <bi...@apache.org>.
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> [...]
> <ballot>
> [ ] +1 Make the release
> [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:
> </ballot>



	-bip



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > > +1 if the load balancing code gets in.
> > > -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will
> > > not work in 4.0.2 ).
> >
> > I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ?
>
> Yes, you have my +1 than. ( it should be a trivial thing, I just want to
> make sure it gets in before the release )

Done.

There are dependencies of the new Java JK components for Tomcat 4 with some
Tomcat 3 components which are not yet in tomcat-util, like util.net and the
PoolTcpConnector. It's fine to use them, but they should be in j-t-c/util.
The build process shouldn't reference the utils which are from the TC 3 tree
anymore.

In the meantime, I removed the new stuff from the build to avoid possible
problems.

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Posted by co...@covalent.net.
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:

> > +1 if the load balancing code gets in.
> > -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will
> > not work in 4.0.2 ).
>
> I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ?

Yes, you have my +1 than. ( it should be a trivial thing, I just want to
make sure it gets in before the release )

Thanks,
Costin


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Posted by Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
> +1 if the load balancing code gets in.
> -0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will
> not work in 4.0.2 ).

I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ?

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Posted by co...@covalent.net.
+1 if the load balancing code gets in.
-0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will
not work in 4.0.2 ).

Costin


> The release process will be the following:
> - Tag j-t-c/webapp with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Update the Java sources for webapp in the main Tomcat tree to mirror the
> changes; I plan to remove the duplication for the next release, and handle
> webapp the same way as JK (or Coyote)
> - Tag j-t-c/jk with "tomcat_402_b2" (it's fine to also tag it with something
> else, I just think it's a better way to mark which version went in)
> - Tag j-t-c/util with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Generate binaries for the Java code from the j-t-c components, and update
> the binaries in the main Tomcat tree
> - Tag the Tomcat tree with "tomcat_402_b2"
> - Build and upload the main Tomcat binaries
> - Build and upload the native binaries for JK and webapp
> - Build and upload the RPMs
>
> Note: IMO JK should be considered release quality in this release, and
> should be enabled by default; of course, the final word on this goes to the
> JK developers :)
>
> Thanks,
> Remy
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>


Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

Posted by "Craig R. McClanahan" <cr...@apache.org>.

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:

>
> <ballot>
> [X] +1 Make the release
> [ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
> [ ] -0 Bad idea
> [ ] -1 No, because:
> </ballot>
>

Craig


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>