You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@hyrumwright.org> on 2009/05/05 15:53:06 UTC
1.6.2 tomorrow
I'm planning on rolling 1.6.2 tomorrow, late afternoon CDT. A couple
of items of interest:
* Daniel reported a segfault in 1.6.1 which I don't know has been
addressed
* STATUS could use more review and votes
* Paul still has a few merge-related fixes he'd like to nominate
I'm not currently inclined to hold the release for the above issues,
unless people can present a case to do so. (But I'm a pretty easy
push-over, so don't sweat it too much. :) )
-Hyrum
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2070488
Re: 1.6.2 tomorrow
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
Agreed that 1.6 shouldn't segfault on 1.7 wc's. But:
* format-11 won't be in 1.7, and (AFAIK) the bug hasn't been reported
against format-12 wc's, so we don't know if there IS a bug to be fixed.
* we can fix it in 1.6.3
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, 7 May 2009 at 23:42 +0200:
> Sure, but we're going to release 1.7 at some point. If the 1.6 code
> doesn't like newer formats, then we should know that *now*. Try and
> get a fix into 1.6 so that it will gracefully bail out.
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 23:03, Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> > Hyrum K. Wright wrote on Tue, 5 May 2009 at 10:53 -0500:
> >> I'm planning on rolling 1.6.2 tomorrow, late afternoon CDT. A couple
> >> of items of interest:
> >> * Daniel reported a segfault in 1.6.1 which I don't know has been
> >> addressed
> >
> > (thanks! *I* forgot about it)
> >
> > Which? If it's the "'svn1.6.1 up format-11-wc' blows up" that I reported
> > (twice) on IRC, I don't know whether it's possible to reproduce it without
> > involving format>10 (i.e., dev format) wc's.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> >> * STATUS could use more review and votes
> >> * Paul still has a few merge-related fixes he'd like to nominate
> >>
> >> I'm not currently inclined to hold the release for the above issues,
> >> unless people can present a case to do so. (But I'm a pretty easy
> >> push-over, so don't sweat it too much. :) )
> >>
> >> -Hyrum
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------
> >> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2070488
> >>
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2100526
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2108567
Re: 1.6.2 tomorrow
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
Sure, but we're going to release 1.7 at some point. If the 1.6 code
doesn't like newer formats, then we should know that *now*. Try and
get a fix into 1.6 so that it will gracefully bail out.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 23:03, Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote on Tue, 5 May 2009 at 10:53 -0500:
>> I'm planning on rolling 1.6.2 tomorrow, late afternoon CDT. A couple
>> of items of interest:
>> * Daniel reported a segfault in 1.6.1 which I don't know has been
>> addressed
>
> (thanks! *I* forgot about it)
>
> Which? If it's the "'svn1.6.1 up format-11-wc' blows up" that I reported
> (twice) on IRC, I don't know whether it's possible to reproduce it without
> involving format>10 (i.e., dev format) wc's.
>
> Daniel
>
>> * STATUS could use more review and votes
>> * Paul still has a few merge-related fixes he'd like to nominate
>>
>> I'm not currently inclined to hold the release for the above issues,
>> unless people can present a case to do so. (But I'm a pretty easy
>> push-over, so don't sweat it too much. :) )
>>
>> -Hyrum
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2070488
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2100526
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2100965
Re: 1.6.2 tomorrow
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
Hyrum K. Wright wrote on Tue, 5 May 2009 at 10:53 -0500:
> I'm planning on rolling 1.6.2 tomorrow, late afternoon CDT. A couple
> of items of interest:
> * Daniel reported a segfault in 1.6.1 which I don't know has been
> addressed
(thanks! *I* forgot about it)
Which? If it's the "'svn1.6.1 up format-11-wc' blows up" that I reported
(twice) on IRC, I don't know whether it's possible to reproduce it without
involving format>10 (i.e., dev format) wc's.
Daniel
> * STATUS could use more review and votes
> * Paul still has a few merge-related fixes he'd like to nominate
>
> I'm not currently inclined to hold the release for the above issues,
> unless people can present a case to do so. (But I'm a pretty easy
> push-over, so don't sweat it too much. :) )
>
> -Hyrum
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2070488
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2100526
Re: 1.6.2 tomorrow
Posted by Paul Burba <pt...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Hyrum K. Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org> wrote:
> I'm planning on rolling 1.6.2 tomorrow, late afternoon CDT. A couple
> of items of interest:
> * Daniel reported a segfault in 1.6.1 which I don't know has been
> addressed
> * STATUS could use more review and votes
> * Paul still has a few merge-related fixes he'd like to nominate
Clarification: It's more that I'd like to encourage review of what is
*already* nominated re merge fixes. Particularly r36527, r36509, and
r37491, all of which improve merge performance when dealing with lots
of subtrees with mergeinfo. On our own repository this is not a very
significant problem, but there are users out there with hundreds and
in some cases thousands of subtrees with mergeinfo, and performance
has been a big problem for them.
Paul
> I'm not currently inclined to hold the release for the above issues,
> unless people can present a case to do so. (But I'm a pretty easy
> push-over, so don't sweat it too much. :) )
>
> -Hyrum
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2070488
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2070569