You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@accumulo.apache.org by "Christopher Tubbs (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/04/02 16:55:25 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-658) refactor code into separate modules
where appropriate
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Christopher Tubbs updated ACCUMULO-658:
---------------------------------------
Issue Type: Task (was: Sub-task)
Parent: (was: ACCUMULO-210)
> refactor code into separate modules where appropriate
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-658
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-658
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Adam Fuchs
> Assignee: Christopher Tubbs
> Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>
> This ticket is a parent of several other tickets, under which we can discuss the merits of separating or grouping particular modules into more or fewer maven projects. Here's a list of pros and cons:
> h6. Pros:
> * Explicit modularity encourages reuse outside of Accumulo.
> * Smaller projects encourage participation in coding project-local features.
> * Projects like the shell and the monitor can be exemplars for new projects or applications built on top of Accumulo.
> * Separating projects forces use of publicly accessible APIs instead of custom connections. This is a form of dogfooding, and helps code quality.
> h6. Cons:
> * More projects means more maven configuration, particularly in downstream projects that are dependent on multiple projects.
> * Coding features across projects might be harder to comprehend and to test.
> * In the extreme case, we may see public API bloat in order to support too diverse a set of projects.
> Discuss...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)