Re: Why Turbine security om classes didn't use om classes generatedby Torque?

[Eric Dobbs <er...@dobbse.net>]

In TDK2.1 I don't think the security tables are torque generated.
This is a known problem that has been fixed in the decoupled
Torque.  Your next question will be about using the decoupled
Torque.  For that you will need to use the 2.2beta TDK here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-turbine/tdk/release/2.2-b1/

Hope that helps.
-Eric

On Wednesday, April 10, 2002, at 10:42  PM, Mao.Qingwen@ing.com.au wrote:

> The Torque I used to generate my om classes was bundled with the 
> download file
> tdk-2.1.zip.md5.
> Basically, I use the ant build script provided by tdk to generated 
> those om
> classes. The om classes I've generated
> don't have checkExist() API. But in the Turbine Security om classes like
> UserPeer, RolePeer, PermissionPeer
> all have checkExist(). And Turbine Security om classes don't have the 
> Base*
> classes. I am just wondering
> what happened here?
>
> I suspect if the turbine security classes are generated by torque, it 
> probably
> uses different Torque versions.
> Could you please confirm which Torque version do you use?


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>