You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cocoon.apache.org by Richard In Public <ed...@blueyonder.co.uk> on 2003/03/26 23:19:23 UTC
Are Continuations Expensive?
Hi
I'm about to dive into Continutations and I'm wondering about their
scalability. I don't know much about the implementation, but isn't storing
the StackTrace expensive?
Richard Hoberman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Are Continuations Expensive?
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@upaya.co.uk>.
> I'm about to dive into Continutations and I'm wondering about their
> scalability. I don't know much about the implementation, but isn't
> storing the StackTrace expensive?
First a disclaimer: I've never used continuations.
>From discussions on cocoon-dev, I understand that only the part of a stack that is
different from others is stored, not the whole stack each time. Also, variables are
shared between continuations, again reducing memory usage.
I'm not saying that this makes them inexpensive - just that memory usage does
appear to have been thought about.
Upayavira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: cocoon-users-help@xml.apache.org