You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cloudstack.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/10/09 04:17:52 UTC

[GitHub] [cloudstack] hstan77 opened a new issue #4391: Allow multiple localstorage based on VolumeGroup

hstan77 opened a new issue #4391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4391


   <!--
   Verify first that your issue/request is not already reported on GitHub.
   Also test if the latest release and master branch are affected too.
   Always add information AFTER of these HTML comments, but no need to delete the comments.
   -->
   
   ##### ISSUE TYPE
   <!-- Pick one below and delete the rest -->
    * Feature Idea
   
   
   ##### COMPONENT NAME
   <!--
   Categorize the issue, e.g. API, VR, VPN, UI, etc.
   -->
   ~~~
   
   ~~~
   
   ##### CLOUDSTACK VERSION
   <!--
   New line separated list of affected versions, commit ID for issues on master branch.
   -->
   
   ~~~
   Cloudstack 4.14
   ~~~
   
   ##### CONFIGURATION
   <!--
   Information about the configuration if relevant, e.g. basic network, advanced networking, etc.  N/A otherwise
   -->
   
   
   ##### OS / ENVIRONMENT
   <!--
   Information about the environment if relevant, N/A otherwise
   -->
   
   
   ##### SUMMARY
   <!-- Explain the problem/feature briefly -->
   
   Lack of preference storage type for Cloudstack, or less option for proper storage 
   
   Current SharedMountPoint idea can use for VolumGroup and ISCSI, but the system expecting to have Clustered File System for multiple host in the same cluster ,  in order to use the Same SharedMountPoint.   So for those that wish to wish to use the shared mount point,  it has to be create many cluster with single host.  
   
   Other like LocalStorage is only support File-based which a lot reduce the efficiency of VM.  
   
   It shall be able to make it a lot more efficient with ISCSI / VolumeGroup  as primary storage.  Administrator expecting know how to mount iscsi or create volumegroup before add Primary Storage. 
   
   With this way, it shall be make the Cloudstack more Efficient on Creating VM with same hardware budget .
   
   
   
   ##### STEPS TO REPRODUCE
   <!--
   For bugs, show exactly how to reproduce the problem, using a minimal test-case. Use Screenshots if accurate.
   
   For new features, show how the feature would be used.
   -->
   
   <!-- Paste example playbooks or commands between quotes below -->
   ~~~
   
   ~~~
   
   <!-- You can also paste gist.github.com links for larger files -->
   
   ##### EXPECTED RESULTS
   <!-- What did you expect to happen when running the steps above? -->
   
   ~~~
   
   Allow adding multiple local storage based on VolumeGroup.
   
   
   
   ~~~
   
   ##### ACTUAL RESULTS
   <!-- What actually happened? -->
   
   <!-- Paste verbatim command output between quotes below -->
   ~~~
   
   ~~~
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack] DaanHoogland commented on issue #4391: Allow multiple localstorage based on VolumeGroup

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
DaanHoogland commented on issue #4391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4391#issuecomment-733204287


   @hstan77 sorry to ask but I don't think I'm clear on what you are asking here. Are you speaking of volumegroups or clustered deistributed filesystems?


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack] andrijapanicsb commented on issue #4391: Allow multiple localstorage based on VolumeGroup

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
andrijapanicsb commented on issue #4391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4391#issuecomment-735890580


   @hstan77 I'm not sure if I'm reading your explanation correctly or not. The existing ShareMountPoint means you would need to attach the same LUN (iSCSI or FC, etc) to all the hosts in the cluster and then format this LUN with a clustered filesystem so that multiple hosts can write to the same shared(mountPoint) storage without causing file system corruption.
   
   How do you see (this is what I don't understand) your storage solution proposal being different - i.e. what is missing that you would like to see?


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack] hstan77 commented on issue #4391: Allow multiple localstorage based on VolumeGroup

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
hstan77 commented on issue #4391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4391#issuecomment-769862291


   Currently for shared mount point  ,  it need to be run on Clustered
   Filesystem, such as GFS2 or ocfs2 ,  OCFS2 is seems support till centos 6
   only .   GFS2 has not easy to maintain and seems many issue for
   implementing it .
   
   Thats I am asking of possible support LVM base local storage .
   
   On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:13 PM dahn <no...@github.com> wrote:
   
   > @hstan77 <https://github.com/hstan77> local is local filesystem based not
   > file based any LGLVM that has a filesystem on it could be used. How
   > filesystems are mounted locally on the hypervisor would not really matter
   > to ACS would it? So i am still wondering what exactly you mean.
   >
   > —
   > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
   > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
   > <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4391#issuecomment-769828792>,
   > or unsubscribe
   > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARFNGASKH3MORWSC4OJK3ETS4K7BLANCNFSM4SJSK5RQ>
   > .
   >
   
   
   -- 
   Regards,
   Hean Seng
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack] xuanyuanaosheng commented on issue #4391: Allow multiple localstorage based on VolumeGroup

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
xuanyuanaosheng commented on issue #4391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4391#issuecomment-1085702096


   @hstan77 Any update ? which storage solution do you use?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack] DaanHoogland commented on issue #4391: Allow multiple localstorage based on VolumeGroup

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
DaanHoogland commented on issue #4391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4391#issuecomment-769828792


   @hstan77 local is local filesystem based not file based any LGLVM that has a filesystem on it could be used. How filesystems are mounted locally on the hypervisor would not really matter to ACS would it? So i am still wondering what exactly you mean.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack] hstan77 commented on issue #4391: Allow multiple localstorage based on VolumeGroup

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
hstan77 commented on issue #4391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4391#issuecomment-735615897


   Hi Dahn,
   
   I means is the  Local VolumeGroup ,  as alternative of LocalStorage that
   file based.
   
   
   By the way, I can't find a good way of implementing  clustered deistributed
   filesystems also .  Now I am trying on the Ceph and NFS .
   
   
   On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 4:05 AM dahn <no...@github.com> wrote:
   
   > @hstan77 <https://github.com/hstan77> sorry to ask but I don't think I'm
   > clear on what you are asking here. Are you speaking of volumegroups or
   > clustered deistributed filesystems?
   >
   > —
   > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
   > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
   > <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4391#issuecomment-733204287>,
   > or unsubscribe
   > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARFNGASE2LAPZNZ43AGXETDSRQGYZANCNFSM4SJSK5RQ>
   > .
   >
   
   
   -- 
   Regards,
   Hean Seng
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack] hstan77 commented on issue #4391: Allow multiple localstorage based on VolumeGroup

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
hstan77 commented on issue #4391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4391#issuecomment-769818996


   Hi
   
   I understand Andrija said . Just I hope there is opton of LVM as
   localstorage insteaod of file based.
   
   On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:01 PM dahn <no...@github.com> wrote:
   
   > @hstan77 <https://github.com/hstan77> I'm afraid this issue is still not
   > well defined. Do you have an update?
   >
   > —
   > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
   > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
   > <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4391#issuecomment-769791713>,
   > or unsubscribe
   > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARFNGARNWUMTYT3C7HO5K7DS4KWUDANCNFSM4SJSK5RQ>
   > .
   >
   
   
   -- 
   Regards,
   Hean Seng
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [cloudstack] DaanHoogland commented on issue #4391: Allow multiple localstorage based on VolumeGroup

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
DaanHoogland commented on issue #4391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4391#issuecomment-769791713


   @hstan77 I'm afraid this issue is still not well defined. Do you have an update?


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org