Re: TCK compliance [was: is there such a thing as a commonxml-apis.jar]

[Elena Litani <el...@ca.ibm.com>]

Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> I don't think you can be compliant
> with SAX 2.0.1 or DOM3 without being compatible with SAX 2.0 and DOM
> 2. 

SAX 2.0.1 had a signature change and DOM3 introduces new methods in the
existing interfaces (plus addes new interfaces to the org.w3c.dom
package), and these changes will _not_ allow implementations to pass the
JAXP TCK since the TCK tests that signatures are as definded in the spec
and that no new signatures are added to the interfaces/classes.

-- 
Elena Litani / IBM Toronto

---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail:     webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail:          general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org