You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com> on 2008/10/01 10:49:23 UTC
Re: Failover with useAsyncSend
nope, there is no conflict, you should be able to use both. Do you
find failover without asyncSend works?
2008/9/30 SarcasmMonster <pa...@gmail.com>:
>
> When I try to use the failover with use async:
>
> failover:(tcp://localhost:61616?jms.useAsyncSend=true)
>
> my program blocks forever. If I take off failover, it connects and does its
> thing. Is there some conflict between failover annd useAsyncSend?
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Failover-with-useAsyncSend-tp19746435p19746435.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: Failover with useAsyncSend
Posted by SarcasmMonster <pa...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for replying.
If I take off the either the failover or the useAsyncSend, it will work.
Basically I can't use both at once.
There is some mention of the problem here too:
http://thiamteck.blogspot.com/2008/09/activemq-failover-with-async-send.html
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/17230
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Failover-with-useAsyncSend-tp19746435p19759328.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Failover with useAsyncSend
Posted by SarcasmMonster <pa...@gmail.com>.
By the way, I am currently using ActiveMQ 5.1.0
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Failover-with-useAsyncSend-tp19746435p19759364.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.