You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> on 2020/01/24 10:27:15 UTC
[VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Hi,
R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
released package
Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
Vote:
[ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
[ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote will be only open for a week.
Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another process documented at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
Thank you for your attention
Jacques
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Hi Ingo,
Your message has been moderated.
Please subscribe to the dev ML and then use your email client.
See here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html.
Thanks
Jacques
Le 31/01/2020 à 15:12, Ingo Könemann a écrit :
> -1
>
>
> Ingo Könemann
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Ingo Könemann <in...@ecomify.de>.
-1
Ingo Könemann
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Mathieu Lirzin <ma...@nereide.fr>.
Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> writes:
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
+1
--
Mathieu Lirzin
GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Aditya Sharma <ad...@apache.org>.
-1
Thanks and Regards,
Aditya Sharma
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:02 PM James Yong <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards,
> James
>
> On 2020/01/24 10:27:15, Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of
> support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the
> next to be
> > released package
> >
> > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
> >
> > Vote:
> > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
> >
> > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this
> vote will be only open for a week.
> >
> > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is
> another process documented at
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
> >
> > Thank you for your attention
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by James Yong <ja...@apache.org>.
+1
Regards,
James
On 2020/01/24 10:27:15, Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
> released package
>
> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote will be only open for a week.
>
> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another process documented at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>
> Thank you for your attention
>
> Jacques
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Michael Brohl <mi...@ecomify.de>.
-1
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 24.01.20 um 11:27 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
> Hi,
>
> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of
> support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about
> the next to be released package
>
> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would
> prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so
> this vote will be only open for a week.
>
> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is
> another process documented at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>
>
> Thank you for your attention
>
> Jacques
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Dennis Balkir <de...@ecomify.de>.
-1
Dennis Balkir
Am 24.01.20 um 11:27 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
> Hi,
>
> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of
> support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about
> the next to be released package
>
> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would
> prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so
> this vote will be only open for a week.
>
> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is
> another process documented at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>
>
> Thank you for your attention
>
> Jacques
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Nicolas Malin <ni...@nereide.fr>.
-1
Nicolas
On 24/01/2020 11:27, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of
> support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about
> the next to be released package
>
> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would
> prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so
> this vote will be only open for a week.
>
> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is
> another process documented at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>
>
> Thank you for your attention
>
> Jacques
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Pawan Verma <pa...@hotwaxsystems.com>.
-1
--
Thanks & Regards
Pawan Verma
Technical Consultant
*HotWax Systems*
*Enterprise open source experts*
http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 1:30 PM Benjamin Jugl <be...@ecomify.de>
wrote:
> -1
>
> Am 24.01.20 um 11:27 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
> > Hi,
> >
> > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of
> > support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about
> > the next to be released package
> >
> > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would
> > prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
> >
> > Vote:
> > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
> >
> > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so
> > this vote will be only open for a week.
> >
> > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is
> > another process documented at
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
> >
> >
> > Thank you for your attention
> >
> > Jacques
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Benjamin Jugl <be...@ecomify.de>.
-1
Am 24.01.20 um 11:27 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
> Hi,
>
> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of
> support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about
> the next to be released package
>
> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would
> prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so
> this vote will be only open for a week.
>
> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is
> another process documented at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>
>
> Thank you for your attention
>
> Jacques
Re: Polluting the vote thread, was: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and
directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Sure, just that Taher started with "I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch." and I wanted to explain more my perspective.
OK the buck stop here :)
Jacques
Le 24/01/2020 à 17:57, Michael Brohl a écrit :
> Could you please stop discussing inside the vote thread itself?
>
> Firstly, we discussed beforehand and the vote should be held on base of that discussion. If more infomation is added we might even have to cancel
> the vote again because participants who already voted had another base of information.
>
> Secondly, it is rather difficult to follow to see the real vote results.
>
> Thanks
>
> Michael Brohl
>
> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>
>
> Am 24.01.20 um 17:42 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
>> Forgot: sorry for the resentment, it's not specially against you, most of us are not backporting since we turned to Git.
>>
>> I don't think it's a coincidence, but maybe there are other reasons?
>>
>> Le 24/01/2020 à 17:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>> Hi Taher,
>>>
>>> Are you backporting much? Since we switched to Git? Mmm OK, none. this may explain that ;)
>>>
>>> As I said to Nicolas:
>>>
>>> <<I must say I'm mostly against [releasing R17] because of the surplus of effort necessary to backport to both R17 and R18.
>>> [...] Sincerely it's more work with Git than it was with Svn where we had scripts for that. I'd maybe change my mind if OFBIZ-11297 would be
>>> done... >>
>>>
>>> Let's see what the future will tell us...
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> Le 24/01/2020 à 15:11, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
>>>> -1
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 4:19 PM Gil Portenseigne <gi...@nereide.fr>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of
>>>>> support. We
>>>>>> can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
>>>>>> released package
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
>>>>> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>>>>>> Vote:
>>>>>> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
>>>>>> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this
>>>>> vote will be only open for a week.
>>>>>> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is
>>>>> another process documented at
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>>>>>> Thank you for your attention
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>
Re: Polluting the vote thread, was: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and
directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Michael Brohl <mi...@ecomify.de>.
Could you please stop discussing inside the vote thread itself?
Firstly, we discussed beforehand and the vote should be held on base of
that discussion. If more infomation is added we might even have to
cancel the vote again because participants who already voted had another
base of information.
Secondly, it is rather difficult to follow to see the real vote results.
Thanks
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 24.01.20 um 17:42 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
> Forgot: sorry for the resentment, it's not specially against you, most
> of us are not backporting since we turned to Git.
>
> I don't think it's a coincidence, but maybe there are other reasons?
>
> Le 24/01/2020 à 17:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>> Hi Taher,
>>
>> Are you backporting much? Since we switched to Git? Mmm OK, none.
>> this may explain that ;)
>>
>> As I said to Nicolas:
>>
>> <<I must say I'm mostly against [releasing R17] because of the
>> surplus of effort necessary to backport to both R17 and R18.
>> [...] Sincerely it's more work with Git than it was with Svn where
>> we had scripts for that. I'd maybe change my mind if OFBIZ-11297
>> would be
>> done... >>
>>
>> Let's see what the future will tell us...
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> Le 24/01/2020 à 15:11, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
>>> -1
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 4:19 PM Gil Portenseigne
>>> <gi...@nereide.fr>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of
>>>> support. We
>>>>> can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next
>>>>> to be
>>>>> released package
>>>>>
>>>>> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would
>>>>> prefer
>>>> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>>>>> Vote:
>>>>> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
>>>>> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>>>>>
>>>>> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus,
>>>>> so this
>>>> vote will be only open for a week.
>>>>> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is
>>>> another process documented at
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your attention
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Forgot: sorry for the resentment, it's not specially against you, most of us are not backporting since we turned to Git.
I don't think it's a coincidence, but maybe there are other reasons?
Le 24/01/2020 à 17:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> Hi Taher,
>
> Are you backporting much? Since we switched to Git? Mmm OK, none. this may explain that ;)
>
> As I said to Nicolas:
>
> <<I must say I'm mostly against [releasing R17] because of the surplus of effort necessary to backport to both R17 and R18.
> [...] Sincerely it's more work with Git than it was with Svn where we had scripts for that. I'd maybe change my mind if OFBIZ-11297 would be
> done... >>
>
> Let's see what the future will tell us...
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 24/01/2020 à 15:11, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
>> -1
>>
>> I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 4:19 PM Gil Portenseigne <gi...@nereide.fr>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of
>>> support. We
>>>> can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
>>>> released package
>>>>
>>>> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
>>> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>>>> Vote:
>>>> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
>>>> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>>>>
>>>> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this
>>> vote will be only open for a week.
>>>> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is
>>> another process documented at
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>>>> Thank you for your attention
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Hi Taher,
Are you backporting much? Since we switched to Git? Mmm OK, none. this may explain that ;)
As I said to Nicolas:
<<I must say I'm mostly against [releasing R17] because of the surplus of effort necessary to backport to both R17 and R18.
[...] Sincerely it's more work with Git than it was with Svn where we had scripts for that. I'd maybe change my mind if OFBIZ-11297 would be
done... >>
Let's see what the future will tell us...
Jacques
Le 24/01/2020 à 15:11, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
> -1
>
> I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch.
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 4:19 PM Gil Portenseigne <gi...@nereide.fr>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of
>> support. We
>>> can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
>>> released package
>>>
>>> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
>> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>>> Vote:
>>> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
>>> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>>>
>>> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this
>> vote will be only open for a week.
>>> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is
>> another process documented at
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>>> Thank you for your attention
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Taher Alkhateeb <sl...@gmail.com>.
-1
I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 4:19 PM Gil Portenseigne <gi...@nereide.fr>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of
> support. We
> > can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
> > released package
> >
> > Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
> >
> > Vote:
> > [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> > [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
> >
> > We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this
> vote will be only open for a week.
> >
> > Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is
> another process documented at
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
> >
> > Thank you for your attention
> >
> > Jacques
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Gil Portenseigne <gi...@nereide.fr>.
+1
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We
> can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
> released package
>
> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote will be only open for a week.
>
> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another process documented at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>
> Thank you for your attention
>
> Jacques
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
+1
Jacques
Le 24/01/2020 à 11:27, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to
> be released package
>
> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote will be only open for a week.
>
> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another process documented at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>
> Thank you for your attention
>
> Jacques
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Swapnil M Mane <sw...@apache.org>.
-1
Best regards,
Swapnil M Mane,
ofbiz.apache.org
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 3:57 PM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support.
> We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
> released package
>
> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this
> vote will be only open for a week.
>
> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another
> process documented at
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>
> Thank you for your attention
>
> Jacques
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Hi Ulrich ,
Your message has been moderated.
Please subscribe to the dev ML and then use your email client.
See here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html.
Thanks
Jacques
Le 31/01/2020 à 15:13, Ulrich Heidfeld a écrit :
> -1
>
>
> Ulrich Heidfeld
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Ulrich Heidfeld <ul...@ecomify.de>.
-1
Ulrich Heidfeld
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18
instead.
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Ah, we crossed on wire with Dennis's -1 vote, anyway again it does not change the result
Le 31/01/2020 à 15:17, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> Le 24/01/2020 à 11:27, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to
>> be released package
>>
>> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>>
>> Vote:
>> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
>> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>>
>> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote will be only open for a week.
>>
>> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another process documented at
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>>
>> Thank you for your attention
>>
>> Jacques
>>
> Thank you All,
>
> As it was not a vote for a release process, I did not separate binding votes from others votes. Anyway it would not have changed the vote result.
>
> The voting process is now closed and the vote is negative, with 6 positive votes ("+1"), 10 negative votes, and a neutral vote.
>
> Thank you all for your participation.
>
> The R17 branch will be released before the R18
>
> Jacques
>
[VOTE] [RESULT] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Le 24/01/2020 à 11:27, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support. We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to
> be released package
>
> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this vote will be only open for a week.
>
> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another process documented at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>
> Thank you for your attention
>
> Jacques
>
Thank you All,
As it was not a vote for a release process, I did not separate binding votes from others votes. Anyway it would not have changed the vote result.
The voting process is now closed and the vote is negative, with 6 positive votes ("+1"), 10 negative votes, and a neutral vote.
Thank you all for your participation.
The R17 branch will be released before the R18
Jacques
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@gmail.com>.
0
Jacopo
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support.
> We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
> released package
>
> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this
> vote will be only open for a week.
>
> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another
> process documented at
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>
> Thank you for your attention
>
> Jacques
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Paul Foxworthy <pa...@cohsoft.com.au.INVALID>.
+1
Thanks
Paul Foxworthy
On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 21:27, Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support.
> We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
> released package
>
> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this
> vote will be only open for a week.
>
> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another
> process documented at
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>
> Thank you for your attention
>
> Jacques
>
>
--
Coherent Software Australia Pty Ltd
PO Box 2773
Cheltenham Vic 3192
Australia
Phone: +61 3 9585 6788
Web: http://www.coherentsoftware.com.au/
Email: info@coherentsoftware.com.au
Re: [VOTE] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
Posted by Pierre Smits <pi...@apache.org>.
+1
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President*
*Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
*Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without privileges)
since 2008*
Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of support.
> We can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
> released package
>
> Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
> to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
>
> Vote:
> [ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
> [ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
>
> We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this
> vote will be only open for a week.
>
> Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is another
> process documented at
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
>
> Thank you for your attention
>
> Jacques
>
>