[Incubation] status

[Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>]

Hi guys,

I have updated the Groovy status page :
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/groovy.html

There are a few remaining tasks to be completed, the main one being the
migration of the source code to the Apache repository. This should be
quite easy to do.

Note that many of the cleanup tasks (ie, ASF headers, IP clearance and
such) can be done after this migratiuon !

Thanks !

Re: [Incubation] status

[Pascal Schumacher <pa...@gmx.net>]

So what are we waiting for? :)

Anything I can do to help?

-Pascal

Am 06.04.2015 um 18:31 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Cédric Champeau
> <ce...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't really understand the difference between "importing the code in an
>> ASF repo" and "code initially imported" here. Could you elaborate what you
>> mean?...
> I'm not sure why Emmanuel mentions IP clearance, that's
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ which specifically says "not
> for new projects". If Groovy were to import more code later, that
> process would apply (and take a bit longer due to the votes required).
>
> But right now, for the initial code import of the new podling, the
> signed Software Grant [1] is sufficient.
>
> -Bertrand

Re: [Incubation] status

[Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>]

Le 06/04/15 18:31, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Cédric Champeau
> <ce...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't really understand the difference between "importing the code in an
>> ASF repo" and "code initially imported" here. Could you elaborate what you
>> mean?...
> I'm not sure why Emmanuel mentions IP clearance, that's
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ which specifically says "not
> for new projects". If Groovy were to import more code later, that
> process would apply (and take a bit longer due to the votes required).

I'm sorry for the confusion. Bertrand is right here. My bad.

Re: [Incubation] status

[Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>]

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Cédric Champeau
<ce...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't really understand the difference between "importing the code in an
> ASF repo" and "code initially imported" here. Could you elaborate what you
> mean?...

I'm not sure why Emmanuel mentions IP clearance, that's
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ which specifically says "not
for new projects". If Groovy were to import more code later, that
process would apply (and take a bit longer due to the votes required).

But right now, for the initial code import of the new podling, the
signed Software Grant [1] is sufficient.

-Bertrand

Re: [Incubation] status

[Cédric Champeau <ce...@gmail.com>]

I don't really understand the difference between "importing the code in an
ASF repo" and "code initially imported" here. Could you elaborate what you
mean?

Thanks!

2015-04-06 17:23 GMT+02:00 Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > ...Note that many of the cleanup tasks (ie, ASF headers, IP clearance and
> > such) can be done after this migratiuon !...
>
> IMO the IP clearance must happen before importing the code in an ASF
> repository - but for the code that's going to be initially imported
> the Software Grant is sufficient, as per
> https://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt
>
> -Bertrand
>

Re: [Incubation] status

[Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>]

Hi,

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...Note that many of the cleanup tasks (ie, ASF headers, IP clearance and
> such) can be done after this migratiuon !...

IMO the IP clearance must happen before importing the code in an ASF
repository - but for the code that's going to be initially imported
the Software Grant is sufficient, as per
https://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt

-Bertrand