[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating RC #1

[Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>]

There are 5 approving votes, all of which are binding:

* Sergio Fernández
* Seetharam Venkatesh
* Justin Mclean
* Jean-Baptise Onofré
* John D. Ament

There are no disapproving votes.

We'll proceed with this release as staged.

Thanks everyone!


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 at 14:10
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating
To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>


The specified duration is over, I'm hereby closing the vote. Thanks a lot
for your participation!

I'll tally the results in a separate thread.

Cheers,
Aljoscha

On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 at 21:26 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:

I'm going to switch my vote to +1 for the release.  Other issues are issues
outside of this podling's domain.

John

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 9:31 AM John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 3:23 AM Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > So, with respect to the DEPENDENCIES file we're still good to go and
> accept
> > that a rat check won't work on the release?
>
> IMO it’s fine. JFYI you you ran rat manually on the release it shows a few
> more hits, but none IMO are cause for concern.
>
>
> Agreed, the rat/DEPENDENCIES file is a non-issue for the release.
>
> -1 due to the kinesis library issue.
>
>
>
> It it picked up any source files without headers (which it doesn’t) it
> would be OK to fix for the next release.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>