You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4net-dev@logging.apache.org by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> on 2015/10/18 08:20:33 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
log4net 1.2.14 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
(revision 10847)
Details of changes since 1.2.13 are in the release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html
The tag is here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.14RC1
(revision 1709237)
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
will need to get adapted to mention support for 4.5, this can happen
during the time frame of the vote.
Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, not before 0700 GMT
21-Oct 2015
[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-10-19, Ralph Goers wrote:
> There was a security notice that was sent to all PMCs about a month
> ago. The cgi is no longer to be used.
unless it only wraps "mirrors.cgi", which we do.
Cheers
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-10-19, Ralph Goers wrote:
> There was a security notice that was sent to all PMCs about a month
> ago. The cgi is no longer to be used.
unless it only wraps "mirrors.cgi", which we do.
Cheers
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
There was a security notice that was sent to all PMCs about a month ago. The cgi is no longer to be used.
Ralph
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 2015-10-18, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> The download cgi extension should be changed to lua.
>
> Really, I don't recall seeing such a request. Our script is a simple
> wrapper around the mirrors.cgi script, which is supposed to still work
> IIRC. At least it still does here
>
> http://logging.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.cgi
>
> Stefan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
There was a security notice that was sent to all PMCs about a month ago. The cgi is no longer to be used.
Ralph
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 9:02 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 2015-10-18, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> The download cgi extension should be changed to lua.
>
> Really, I don't recall seeing such a request. Our script is a simple
> wrapper around the mirrors.cgi script, which is supposed to still work
> IIRC. At least it still does here
>
> http://logging.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.cgi
>
> Stefan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-10-18, Ralph Goers wrote:
> The download cgi extension should be changed to lua.
Really, I don't recall seeing such a request. Our script is a simple
wrapper around the mirrors.cgi script, which is supposed to still work
IIRC. At least it still does here
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.cgi
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-10-18, Ralph Goers wrote:
> The download cgi extension should be changed to lua.
Really, I don't recall seeing such a request. Our script is a simple
wrapper around the mirrors.cgi script, which is supposed to still work
IIRC. At least it still does here
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.cgi
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
The download cgi extension should be changed to lua.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The website has the following issues:
>
> * Sdk reference is a chm file, no longer a http website
> * several pages have missing menu items in the project documentation section
> * on sites where the missing project documentations are shown, they are displayed with an indent and the menu therefore looks awkward
> * the download page links to a cgi website, does that still work? From memory infra disabled cgi scripts, didnt they?
>
> I'll try to look at the binaries later, but for now these things must be fixed before we release it.
>
>> On 18 Oct 2015 12:40 p.m., "Stefan Bodewig" <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 2015-10-18, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> > I've never built this guy before. Do you have a BUILDING.txt or
>> > instructions on a Wiki on how to validate an log4net RC?
>>
>> http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/building.html
>>
>> Forget all the Visual Studio stuff and go to "NAnt". You should use
>> NAnt 0.92, 0.91 will be fine for Windows as well.
>>
>> If you'd like to validate all DLLs, then you are in for a hunt and very
>> likely need an MSDN subscription to get hold of ancient versions of .NET
>> - so don't even try to do that. Buiding the relase involved combining
>> artifacts built on four different machines (for really old Mono, XP -
>> non networked - for really old .NET, recent Mono and recent .NETs).
>>
>> If you've got access to a recent Windows system and a recent .NET SDK,
>> you'll likely only manage to build the .NET 4.0 and 4.5 assemblies.
>> Likewise on a recent Linux distro with recent Mono packages you'll only
>> receive the mono-3.5 and mono-4.0 binaries.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-10-19, <Jo...@rohde-schwarz.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote on 19.10.2015 13:40:28:
>> [...]
>> If you know of any tool that creates static HTML documentation, then we
>> I'll be happy zo run it once manually to update the site and figure out
>> how to add it to the build process later.
>> For XMLUnit.NET I've switched to monodoc but it took some time to get it
>> set up correctly. AFAICT Sandcastle only supports ASP.NET pages.
> Sandcastle (I suggest using it via the "Sandcastle Help File Builder
> [1])
sorry, I've been sloppy, I used SHFB all along.
> does fine in creating static html output. You just get an *additional*
> index.asp and index.php that provies full-text search, if your server
> supports it.
Oh, it didn't look that way from the description I've seen. Thanks a
lot!
I've manually added the generated HTML files and re-created the website:
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
now contains HTML pages for the SDK reference.
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Jo...@rohde-schwarz.com.
Hi,
Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote on 19.10.2015 13:40:28:
> [...]
> If you know of any tool that creates static HTML documentation, then we
> I'll be happy zo run it once manually to update the site and figure out
> how to add it to the build process later.
>
> For XMLUnit.NET I've switched to monodoc but it took some time to get it
> set up correctly. AFAICT Sandcastle only supports ASP.NET pages.
Sandcastle (I suggest using it via the "Sandcastle Help File Builder [1])
does
fine in creating static html output. You just get an *additional*
index.asp and
index.php that provies full-text search, if your server supports it.
[1]: https://github.com/EWSoftware/SHFB/
Regards,
Jonas
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-10-19, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> On 2015-10-19 06:00, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2015-10-18, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>>> The website has the following issues:
>>> * Sdk reference is a chm file, no longer a http website
>> This won't change, I'm afraid.
>> I forgot to mention it, sorry. ndoc has finally reached the point where
>> it doesn't work for out codebase anymore, it just dies with a
>> NullReferenceException. I've created the docs with Sandcastle, but this
>> one hasn't got any option of creating static HTML files. as far as I can
>> tell.
> *ouch* We had until now the website only and if this reference
> disappears now voices will be heard. That's a showstopper to me.
Just to state the obvious, we can always change the site independent of
any releases.
If you know of any tool that creates static HTML documentation, then we
I'll be happy zo run it once manually to update the site and figure out
how to add it to the build process later.
For XMLUnit.NET I've switched to monodoc but it took some time to get it
set up correctly. AFAICT Sandcastle only supports ASP.NET pages.
>>> * several pages have missing menu items in the project documentation section
>>> * on sites where the missing project documentations are shown, they are
>>> displayed with an indent and the menu therefore looks awkward
>> please help us fix this.
> What can I do?
Start by telling me which pages you are talking about ;-)
I haven't seen any pages with missing menu items (or rather strange
indents) so far. It may depend on the browser, though.
License and everything underneath Community seems to open up the tree
hidden under "Project Documentation" - to me it behaves exactly like the
current site does.
Cheers
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>.
On 2015-10-19 06:00, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2015-10-18, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>
>> The website has the following issues:
>> * Sdk reference is a chm file, no longer a http website
> This won't change, I'm afraid.
>
> I forgot to mention it, sorry. ndoc has finally reached the point where
> it doesn't work for out codebase anymore, it just dies with a
> NullReferenceException. I've created the docs with Sandcastle, but this
> one hasn't got any option of creating static HTML files. as far as I can
> tell.
*ouch* We had until now the website only and if this reference
disappears now voices will be heard. That's a showstopper to me.
>
>> * several pages have missing menu items in the project documentation section
>> * on sites where the missing project documentations are shown, they are
>> displayed with an indent and the menu therefore looks awkward
> please help us fix this.
What can I do?
>
>> * the download page links to a cgi website, does that still work? From
>> memory infra disabled cgi scripts, didnt they?
> OUR cgi script uses the official approach that still works.
Ok, sorry. Reading CGI lead me to a wrong conclusion.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-10-18, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> The website has the following issues:
> * Sdk reference is a chm file, no longer a http website
This won't change, I'm afraid.
I forgot to mention it, sorry. ndoc has finally reached the point where
it doesn't work for out codebase anymore, it just dies with a
NullReferenceException. I've created the docs with Sandcastle, but this
one hasn't got any option of creating static HTML files. as far as I can
tell.
> * several pages have missing menu items in the project documentation section
> * on sites where the missing project documentations are shown, they are
> displayed with an indent and the menu therefore looks awkward
please help us fix this.
> * the download page links to a cgi website, does that still work? From
> memory infra disabled cgi scripts, didnt they?
OUR cgi script uses the official approach that still works.
Cheers
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
The download cgi extension should be changed to lua.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The website has the following issues:
>
> * Sdk reference is a chm file, no longer a http website
> * several pages have missing menu items in the project documentation section
> * on sites where the missing project documentations are shown, they are displayed with an indent and the menu therefore looks awkward
> * the download page links to a cgi website, does that still work? From memory infra disabled cgi scripts, didnt they?
>
> I'll try to look at the binaries later, but for now these things must be fixed before we release it.
>
>> On 18 Oct 2015 12:40 p.m., "Stefan Bodewig" <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 2015-10-18, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> > I've never built this guy before. Do you have a BUILDING.txt or
>> > instructions on a Wiki on how to validate an log4net RC?
>>
>> http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/building.html
>>
>> Forget all the Visual Studio stuff and go to "NAnt". You should use
>> NAnt 0.92, 0.91 will be fine for Windows as well.
>>
>> If you'd like to validate all DLLs, then you are in for a hunt and very
>> likely need an MSDN subscription to get hold of ancient versions of .NET
>> - so don't even try to do that. Buiding the relase involved combining
>> artifacts built on four different machines (for really old Mono, XP -
>> non networked - for really old .NET, recent Mono and recent .NETs).
>>
>> If you've got access to a recent Windows system and a recent .NET SDK,
>> you'll likely only manage to build the .NET 4.0 and 4.5 assemblies.
>> Likewise on a recent Linux distro with recent Mono packages you'll only
>> receive the mono-3.5 and mono-4.0 binaries.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-10-18, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> The website has the following issues:
> * Sdk reference is a chm file, no longer a http website
This won't change, I'm afraid.
I forgot to mention it, sorry. ndoc has finally reached the point where
it doesn't work for out codebase anymore, it just dies with a
NullReferenceException. I've created the docs with Sandcastle, but this
one hasn't got any option of creating static HTML files. as far as I can
tell.
> * several pages have missing menu items in the project documentation section
> * on sites where the missing project documentations are shown, they are
> displayed with an indent and the menu therefore looks awkward
please help us fix this.
> * the download page links to a cgi website, does that still work? From
> memory infra disabled cgi scripts, didnt they?
OUR cgi script uses the official approach that still works.
Cheers
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>.
The website has the following issues:
* Sdk reference is a chm file, no longer a http website
* several pages have missing menu items in the project documentation section
* on sites where the missing project documentations are shown, they are
displayed with an indent and the menu therefore looks awkward
* the download page links to a cgi website, does that still work? From
memory infra disabled cgi scripts, didnt they?
I'll try to look at the binaries later, but for now these things must be
fixed before we release it.
On 18 Oct 2015 12:40 p.m., "Stefan Bodewig" <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2015-10-18, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > I've never built this guy before. Do you have a BUILDING.txt or
> > instructions on a Wiki on how to validate an log4net RC?
>
> http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/building.html
>
> Forget all the Visual Studio stuff and go to "NAnt". You should use
> NAnt 0.92, 0.91 will be fine for Windows as well.
>
> If you'd like to validate all DLLs, then you are in for a hunt and very
> likely need an MSDN subscription to get hold of ancient versions of .NET
> - so don't even try to do that. Buiding the relase involved combining
> artifacts built on four different machines (for really old Mono, XP -
> non networked - for really old .NET, recent Mono and recent .NETs).
>
> If you've got access to a recent Windows system and a recent .NET SDK,
> you'll likely only manage to build the .NET 4.0 and 4.5 assemblies.
> Likewise on a recent Linux distro with recent Mono packages you'll only
> receive the mono-3.5 and mono-4.0 binaries.
>
> Cheers
>
> Stefan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>.
Hey Gary,
is E: a network share?
On 2015-10-19 14:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hm, something is missing with my set up running "build.cmd compile-all":
>
> LOG4NET_DIR is E:\temp\rc\log4net-1.2.14
> NANTEXE_PATH is nant.exe
> BUILD_FILE is E:\temp\rc\log4net-1.2.14\log4net.build
> log4net:ERROR XmlConfiguratorAttribute: Exception getting
> ConfigurationFileLocation. Must be able to resolve
> ConfigurationFileLocation when ConfigFile and ConfigFileExtension
> properties are not set.
> System.Security.SecurityException: Request for the permission of type
> 'System.Security.Permissions.FileIOPermission, mscorlib,
> Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089' failed.
> at System.Security.CodeAccessSecurityEngine.Check(Object demand,
> StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean isPermSet)
> at System.Security.CodeAccessPermission.Demand()
> at System.AppDomainSetup.VerifyDir(String dir, Boolean normalize)
> at
> log4net.Config.XmlConfiguratorAttribute.ConfigureFromFile(Assembly
> sourceAssembly, ILoggerRepository targetRepository)
> The action that failed was:
> Demand
> The type of the first permission that failed was:
> System.Security.Permissions.FileIOPermission
> The Zone of the assembly that failed was:
> Internet
>
> Unhandled Exception: System.Security.SecurityException: Request for
> ConfigurationPermission failed while attempting to access
> configuration section 'nant'. To allow all callers to access the data
> for this section, set section attribute 'requirePermis
> sion' equal 'false' in the configuration file where this section is
> declared. ---> System.Security.SecurityException: Request for the
> permission of type 'System.Configuration.ConfigurationPermission,
> System.Configuration, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neu
> tral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a' failed.
> at System.Security.CodeAccessSecurityEngine.Check(Object demand,
> StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean isPermSet)
> at System.Security.CodeAccessPermission.Demand()
> at
> System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.CheckPermissionAllowed(String
> configKey, Boolean requirePermission, Boolean isTrustedWithoutAptca)
> --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
> at
> System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.CheckPermissionAllowed(String
> configKey, Boolean requirePermission, Boolean isTrustedWithoutAptca)
> at
> System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.GetSectionRecursive(String configKey,
> Boolean getLkg, Boolean checkPermission, Boolean getRuntimeObject,
> Boolean requestIsHere, Object& result, Object& resultRuntimeObject)
> at System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.GetSection(String
> configKey)
> at System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.GetSection(String
> sectionName)
> at NAnt.Console.ConsoleStub.Framework.GetRuntimeFramework()
> at NAnt.Console.ConsoleStub.Main(String[] args)
>
> ?
>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
> On 2015-10-18, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > I've never built this guy before. Do you have a BUILDING.txt or
> > instructions on a Wiki on how to validate an log4net RC?
>
> http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/building.html
>
> Forget all the Visual Studio stuff and go to "NAnt". You should use
> NAnt 0.92, 0.91 will be fine for Windows as well.
>
> If you'd like to validate all DLLs, then you are in for a hunt and
> very
> likely need an MSDN subscription to get hold of ancient versions
> of .NET
> - so don't even try to do that. Buiding the relase involved combining
> artifacts built on four different machines (for really old Mono, XP -
> non networked - for really old .NET, recent Mono and recent .NETs).
>
> If you've got access to a recent Windows system and a recent .NET SDK,
> you'll likely only manage to build the .NET 4.0 and 4.5 assemblies.
> Likewise on a recent Linux distro with recent Mono packages you'll
> only
> receive the mono-3.5 and mono-4.0 binaries.
>
> Cheers
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
> ggregory@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> <http://garygregory.wordpress.com/>
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-10-19, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hm, something is missing with my set up running "build.cmd compile-all":
welcome to .NET development on Windows :-)
http://stefan.samaflost.de/blog/en/Apache/Log4Net/working_on_the_1.2.11_release.html
you'll need to make sure Windows doesn't consider your NAnt as coming
from an untrusted source.
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
Hm, something is missing with my set up running "build.cmd compile-all":
LOG4NET_DIR is E:\temp\rc\log4net-1.2.14
NANTEXE_PATH is nant.exe
BUILD_FILE is E:\temp\rc\log4net-1.2.14\log4net.build
log4net:ERROR XmlConfiguratorAttribute: Exception getting
ConfigurationFileLocation. Must be able to resolve
ConfigurationFileLocation when ConfigFile and ConfigFileExtension
properties are not set.
System.Security.SecurityException: Request for the permission of type
'System.Security.Permissions.FileIOPermission, mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0,
Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089' failed.
at System.Security.CodeAccessSecurityEngine.Check(Object demand,
StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean isPermSet)
at System.Security.CodeAccessPermission.Demand()
at System.AppDomainSetup.VerifyDir(String dir, Boolean normalize)
at log4net.Config.XmlConfiguratorAttribute.ConfigureFromFile(Assembly
sourceAssembly, ILoggerRepository targetRepository)
The action that failed was:
Demand
The type of the first permission that failed was:
System.Security.Permissions.FileIOPermission
The Zone of the assembly that failed was:
Internet
Unhandled Exception: System.Security.SecurityException: Request for
ConfigurationPermission failed while attempting to access configuration
section 'nant'. To allow all callers to access the data for this section,
set section attribute 'requirePermis
sion' equal 'false' in the configuration file where this section is
declared. ---> System.Security.SecurityException: Request for the
permission of type 'System.Configuration.ConfigurationPermission,
System.Configuration, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neu
tral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a' failed.
at System.Security.CodeAccessSecurityEngine.Check(Object demand,
StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean isPermSet)
at System.Security.CodeAccessPermission.Demand()
at
System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.CheckPermissionAllowed(String
configKey, Boolean requirePermission, Boolean isTrustedWithoutAptca)
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at
System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.CheckPermissionAllowed(String
configKey, Boolean requirePermission, Boolean isTrustedWithoutAptca)
at
System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.GetSectionRecursive(String
configKey, Boolean getLkg, Boolean checkPermission, Boolean
getRuntimeObject, Boolean requestIsHere, Object& result, Object&
resultRuntimeObject)
at System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.GetSection(String
configKey)
at System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.GetSection(String
sectionName)
at NAnt.Console.ConsoleStub.Framework.GetRuntimeFramework()
at NAnt.Console.ConsoleStub.Main(String[] args)
?
Gary
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2015-10-18, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > I've never built this guy before. Do you have a BUILDING.txt or
> > instructions on a Wiki on how to validate an log4net RC?
>
> http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/building.html
>
> Forget all the Visual Studio stuff and go to "NAnt". You should use
> NAnt 0.92, 0.91 will be fine for Windows as well.
>
> If you'd like to validate all DLLs, then you are in for a hunt and very
> likely need an MSDN subscription to get hold of ancient versions of .NET
> - so don't even try to do that. Buiding the relase involved combining
> artifacts built on four different machines (for really old Mono, XP -
> non networked - for really old .NET, recent Mono and recent .NETs).
>
> If you've got access to a recent Windows system and a recent .NET SDK,
> you'll likely only manage to build the .NET 4.0 and 4.5 assemblies.
> Likewise on a recent Linux distro with recent Mono packages you'll only
> receive the mono-3.5 and mono-4.0 binaries.
>
> Cheers
>
> Stefan
>
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>.
The website has the following issues:
* Sdk reference is a chm file, no longer a http website
* several pages have missing menu items in the project documentation section
* on sites where the missing project documentations are shown, they are
displayed with an indent and the menu therefore looks awkward
* the download page links to a cgi website, does that still work? From
memory infra disabled cgi scripts, didnt they?
I'll try to look at the binaries later, but for now these things must be
fixed before we release it.
On 18 Oct 2015 12:40 p.m., "Stefan Bodewig" <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2015-10-18, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > I've never built this guy before. Do you have a BUILDING.txt or
> > instructions on a Wiki on how to validate an log4net RC?
>
> http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/building.html
>
> Forget all the Visual Studio stuff and go to "NAnt". You should use
> NAnt 0.92, 0.91 will be fine for Windows as well.
>
> If you'd like to validate all DLLs, then you are in for a hunt and very
> likely need an MSDN subscription to get hold of ancient versions of .NET
> - so don't even try to do that. Buiding the relase involved combining
> artifacts built on four different machines (for really old Mono, XP -
> non networked - for really old .NET, recent Mono and recent .NETs).
>
> If you've got access to a recent Windows system and a recent .NET SDK,
> you'll likely only manage to build the .NET 4.0 and 4.5 assemblies.
> Likewise on a recent Linux distro with recent Mono packages you'll only
> receive the mono-3.5 and mono-4.0 binaries.
>
> Cheers
>
> Stefan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-10-18, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I've never built this guy before. Do you have a BUILDING.txt or
> instructions on a Wiki on how to validate an log4net RC?
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/building.html
Forget all the Visual Studio stuff and go to "NAnt". You should use
NAnt 0.92, 0.91 will be fine for Windows as well.
If you'd like to validate all DLLs, then you are in for a hunt and very
likely need an MSDN subscription to get hold of ancient versions of .NET
- so don't even try to do that. Buiding the relase involved combining
artifacts built on four different machines (for really old Mono, XP -
non networked - for really old .NET, recent Mono and recent .NETs).
If you've got access to a recent Windows system and a recent .NET SDK,
you'll likely only manage to build the .NET 4.0 and 4.5 assemblies.
Likewise on a recent Linux distro with recent Mono packages you'll only
receive the mono-3.5 and mono-4.0 binaries.
Cheers
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-10-18, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I've never built this guy before. Do you have a BUILDING.txt or
> instructions on a Wiki on how to validate an log4net RC?
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/building.html
Forget all the Visual Studio stuff and go to "NAnt". You should use
NAnt 0.92, 0.91 will be fine for Windows as well.
If you'd like to validate all DLLs, then you are in for a hunt and very
likely need an MSDN subscription to get hold of ancient versions of .NET
- so don't even try to do that. Buiding the relase involved combining
artifacts built on four different machines (for really old Mono, XP -
non networked - for really old .NET, recent Mono and recent .NETs).
If you've got access to a recent Windows system and a recent .NET SDK,
you'll likely only manage to build the .NET 4.0 and 4.5 assemblies.
Likewise on a recent Linux distro with recent Mono packages you'll only
receive the mono-3.5 and mono-4.0 binaries.
Cheers
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
I've never built this guy before. Do you have a BUILDING.txt or
instructions on a Wiki on how to validate an log4net RC?
Gary
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> log4net 1.2.14 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
> (revision 10847)
>
> Details of changes since 1.2.13 are in the release notes:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html
>
> The tag is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.14RC1
> (revision 1709237)
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
>
> will need to get adapted to mention support for 4.5, this can happen
> during the time frame of the vote.
>
> Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, not before 0700 GMT
> 21-Oct 2015
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
>
>
>
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
I've never built this guy before. Do you have a BUILDING.txt or
instructions on a Wiki on how to validate an log4net RC?
Gary
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> log4net 1.2.14 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
> (revision 10847)
>
> Details of changes since 1.2.13 are in the release notes:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html
>
> The tag is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.14RC1
> (revision 1709237)
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
>
> will need to get adapted to mention support for 4.5, this can happen
> during the time frame of the vote.
>
> Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, not before 0700 GMT
> 21-Oct 2015
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
>
>
>
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-10-18, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, not before 0700 GMT
> 21-Oct 2015
Well, I haven't seen any formal vote at all, and even counting my own
implicit one, this isn't enough.
The concerns raised against the site have been addressed, I hope, I've
updated the site for
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
Since I'll be traveling the coming two days I'll leave this vote open
for another three days until 24 Oct - and hope people have time to
review the artifacts themselves.
While only votes by PMC members are binding, testing by anybody is more
than welcome. The assemblies are available from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net/
Cheers
Stefan
Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-11-02, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I apologize Stefan. I had every intention on reviewing the release but time just got away from me. I will look at the next one for sure.
Thanks a lot, Ralph. I plan to cut a new release candidate at the
coming weekend.
Cheers
Stefan
Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-11-02, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I apologize Stefan. I had every intention on reviewing the release but time just got away from me. I will look at the next one for sure.
Thanks a lot, Ralph. I plan to cut a new release candidate at the
coming weekend.
Cheers
Stefan
Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
I apologize Stefan. I had every intention on reviewing the release but time just got away from me. I will look at the next one for sure.
Ralph
> On Nov 1, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> This vote has failed to attract enough votes but there is hope a new RC
> will attract more votes (at least one more vote).
>
> Stefan
>
Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
I apologize Stefan. I had every intention on reviewing the release but time just got away from me. I will look at the next one for sure.
Ralph
> On Nov 1, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> This vote has failed to attract enough votes but there is hope a new RC
> will attract more votes (at least one more vote).
>
> Stefan
>
[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
This vote has failed to attract enough votes but there is hope a new RC
will attract more votes (at least one more vote).
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-10-18, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, not before 0700 GMT
> 21-Oct 2015
Well, I haven't seen any formal vote at all, and even counting my own
implicit one, this isn't enough.
The concerns raised against the site have been addressed, I hope, I've
updated the site for
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
Since I'll be traveling the coming two days I'll leave this vote open
for another three days until 24 Oct - and hope people have time to
review the artifacts themselves.
While only votes by PMC members are binding, testing by anybody is more
than welcome. The assemblies are available from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net/
Cheers
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-11-01, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> There were a few things I wanted to be fixed and I'm finished with doing so
> right now. Should we start another release vote if the next jenkins build
> is ok?
Given that it takes several hours to build an RC I won't be able to do
so before the coming weekend. I'll try to cut free some time then.
> Despite that I've another question regarding the website. As mentioned
> before the menu on the pages:
> * https://logging.apache.org/log4net/mail-lists.html
> * https://logging.apache.org/log4net/issue-tracking.html
> is different from the other pages. But looking at the site source
> (svn/src/site/**) I'm unable to even find a trace of these two pages. How
> are they generated?
They are default pages generated by Maven - and TBH I don't have any
idea how to customize them. Personally I'd just öeave them alone.
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Dominik Psenner <dp...@apache.org>.
There were a few things I wanted to be fixed and I'm finished with doing so
right now. Should we start another release vote if the next jenkins build
is ok? Despite that I've another question regarding the website. As
mentioned before the menu on the pages:
* https://logging.apache.org/log4net/mail-lists.html
* https://logging.apache.org/log4net/issue-tracking.html
is different from the other pages. But looking at the site source
(svn/src/site/**) I'm unable to even find a trace of these two pages. How
are they generated? We surely can't fix those two pages manually every time
we do a release?
Cheers,
Dominik
2015-10-25 12:46 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>:
> On 2015-10-25, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> > I am not clear. Are you still waiting for votes or were you respinning
> > a new candidate?
>
> Waiting for votes.
>
> I don't expect to attract more votes with a new candidate since all
> remarks so far have been related to the site and not the artifacts
> themselves. In addition all concerns about the site have been addressed
> already AFAICS.
>
> Cheers
>
> Stefan
>
> --
> Dominik Psenner
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2015-10-25, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I am not clear. Are you still waiting for votes or were you respinning
> a new candidate?
Waiting for votes.
I don't expect to attract more votes with a new candidate since all
remarks so far have been related to the site and not the artifacts
themselves. In addition all concerns about the site have been addressed
already AFAICS.
Cheers
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
I am not clear. Are you still waiting for votes or were you respinning a new candidate?
Ralph
> On Oct 23, 2015, at 3:05 PM, Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Thanks for your patience and thanks for the efforts you put into this to get another release out of the door!
>
> So far I've re-checked the website and it looks better now. The SDK reference looks different now but that doesn't bother me. The old format had some broken encoding and the current SDK reference is a improvement from that point of view. However, there are a few things that might be worth fixing. The following lists these ordered by priority+effort:
>
> * In the SDK reference have some images gone missing or look odd:
> ** Item.gif
> ** SyncTOC.gif
> ** ExpandAll.bmp
> ** CollapseAll.bmp
> * Clicking on Community/Issue Tracking or Community/Mailing List brings up http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/issue-tracking.html, respectively http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/issue-tracking.html. On both of these sites new menu items appear under Project Documentation:
> Continuous Integration
> Source Repository
> Project License
> Project Team
> Issue Tracking
> Mailing Lists
> These items have a different indentation and both "Issue tracking" and "Mailing Lists" is also listed under "Community".
>
> Please note that both of these are not blockers and definitely just nice to haves. The rest of the website looks just great! Good work! For now I'll go to bed. But if all goes according to my plans, tomorrow evening I'll take a look at the binaries. I won't check the issue tracker if there are issues worth to be fixed as I will not have the time to fix them.
>
> To everyone out there who has patches ready, please bring them forth within the next 24 hours and I will take a look at them. I would prefer a patch sent to log4net-dev, but attaching it to a JIRA issue is fine by me too. The only must have is that the patch must apply safely to the current trunk and should be easily code-reviewable / tested with unit tests.
>
> Good night and read you soon
>
>
> 2015-10-23 18:49 GMT+02:00 Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>:
>> Take your time. It diesn't matter whether you vote two days earlier or
>> later.
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>> On 2015-10-23, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>>
>> > Apologies, I've been terribly busy this week. Right now I'm on the way to a
>> > birthday party and I hope that afterwards I'm (still) able to review the
>> > release. Then we might start a new vote and see how it goes. Read you soon.
>> > On 21 Oct 2015 4:54 p.m., "Jeremiah Gowdy" <je...@gowdy.me> wrote:
>>
>> >>> 1 Release these artifacts
>>
>> >>> On Oct 17, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> >>> log4net 1.2.14 RC1 is available for review here:
>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
>> >>> (revision 10847)
>>
>> >>> Details of changes since 1.2.13 are in the release notes:
>>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html
>>
>> >>> The tag is here:
>> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.14RC1
>> >>> (revision 1709237)
>>
>> >>> Site:
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
>>
>> >>> will need to get adapted to mention support for 4.5, this can happen
>> >>> during the time frame of the vote.
>>
>> >>> Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, not before 0700 GMT
>> >>> 21-Oct 2015
>>
>> >>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>> >>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
>> >>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>> >>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
>
>
> --
> Dominik Psenner
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>.
Hi guys,
Thanks for your patience and thanks for the efforts you put into this to
get another release out of the door!
So far I've re-checked the website and it looks better now. The SDK
reference looks different now but that doesn't bother me. The old format
had some broken encoding and the current SDK reference is a improvement
from that point of view. However, there are a few things that might be
worth fixing. The following lists these ordered by priority+effort:
* In the SDK reference have some images gone missing or look odd:
** Item.gif
** SyncTOC.gif
** ExpandAll.bmp
** CollapseAll.bmp
* Clicking on Community/Issue Tracking or Community/Mailing List brings up
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/issue-tracking.html,
respectively
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/issue-tracking.html. On both
of these sites new menu items appear under Project Documentation:
- Continuous Integration
<http://people.apache.org/%7Ebodewig/log4net/site/integration.html>
- Source Repository
<http://people.apache.org/%7Ebodewig/log4net/site/source-repository.html>
- Project License
<http://people.apache.org/%7Ebodewig/log4net/site/license.html>
- Project Team
<http://people.apache.org/%7Ebodewig/log4net/site/team-list.html>
- *Issue Tracking*
- Mailing Lists
<http://people.apache.org/%7Ebodewig/log4net/site/mail-lists.html>
These items have a different indentation and both "Issue tracking" and
"Mailing Lists" is also listed under "Community".
Please note that both of these are not blockers and definitely just nice to
haves. The rest of the website looks just great! Good work! For now I'll go
to bed. But if all goes according to my plans, tomorrow evening I'll take a
look at the binaries. I won't check the issue tracker if there are issues
worth to be fixed as I will not have the time to fix them.
To everyone out there who has patches ready, please bring them forth within
the next 24 hours and I will take a look at them. I would prefer a patch
sent to log4net-dev, but attaching it to a JIRA issue is fine by me too.
The only must have is that the patch must apply safely to the current trunk
and should be easily code-reviewable / tested with unit tests.
Good night and read you soon
2015-10-23 18:49 GMT+02:00 Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>:
> Take your time. It diesn't matter whether you vote two days earlier or
> later.
>
> Stefan
>
> On 2015-10-23, Dominik Psenner wrote:
>
> > Apologies, I've been terribly busy this week. Right now I'm on the way
> to a
> > birthday party and I hope that afterwards I'm (still) able to review the
> > release. Then we might start a new vote and see how it goes. Read you
> soon.
> > On 21 Oct 2015 4:54 p.m., "Jeremiah Gowdy" <je...@gowdy.me> wrote:
>
> >>> 1 Release these artifacts
>
> >>> On Oct 17, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> >>> log4net 1.2.14 RC1 is available for review here:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
> >>> (revision 10847)
>
> >>> Details of changes since 1.2.13 are in the release notes:
>
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html
>
> >>> The tag is here:
> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.14RC1
> >>> (revision 1709237)
>
> >>> Site:
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
>
> >>> will need to get adapted to mention support for 4.5, this can happen
> >>> during the time frame of the vote.
>
> >>> Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, not before 0700 GMT
> >>> 21-Oct 2015
>
> >>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> >>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> >>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> >>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
>
>
>
>
--
Dominik Psenner
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
Take your time. It diesn't matter whether you vote two days earlier or
later.
Stefan
On 2015-10-23, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> Apologies, I've been terribly busy this week. Right now I'm on the way to a
> birthday party and I hope that afterwards I'm (still) able to review the
> release. Then we might start a new vote and see how it goes. Read you soon.
> On 21 Oct 2015 4:54 p.m., "Jeremiah Gowdy" <je...@gowdy.me> wrote:
>>> 1 Release these artifacts
>>> On Oct 17, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> log4net 1.2.14 RC1 is available for review here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
>>> (revision 10847)
>>> Details of changes since 1.2.13 are in the release notes:
>> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html
>>> The tag is here:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.14RC1
>>> (revision 1709237)
>>> Site:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
>>> will need to get adapted to mention support for 4.5, this can happen
>>> during the time frame of the vote.
>>> Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, not before 0700 GMT
>>> 21-Oct 2015
>>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
Take your time. It diesn't matter whether you vote two days earlier or
later.
Stefan
On 2015-10-23, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> Apologies, I've been terribly busy this week. Right now I'm on the way to a
> birthday party and I hope that afterwards I'm (still) able to review the
> release. Then we might start a new vote and see how it goes. Read you soon.
> On 21 Oct 2015 4:54 p.m., "Jeremiah Gowdy" <je...@gowdy.me> wrote:
>>> 1 Release these artifacts
>>> On Oct 17, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> log4net 1.2.14 RC1 is available for review here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
>>> (revision 10847)
>>> Details of changes since 1.2.13 are in the release notes:
>> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html
>>> The tag is here:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.14RC1
>>> (revision 1709237)
>>> Site:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
>>> will need to get adapted to mention support for 4.5, this can happen
>>> during the time frame of the vote.
>>> Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, not before 0700 GMT
>>> 21-Oct 2015
>>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Dominik Psenner <dp...@apache.org>.
Apologies, I've been terribly busy this week. Right now I'm on the way to a
birthday party and I hope that afterwards I'm (still) able to review the
release. Then we might start a new vote and see how it goes. Read you soon.
On 21 Oct 2015 4:54 p.m., "Jeremiah Gowdy" <je...@gowdy.me> wrote:
> +1 Release these artifacts
>
> > On Oct 17, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > log4net 1.2.14 RC1 is available for review here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
> > (revision 10847)
> >
> > Details of changes since 1.2.13 are in the release notes:
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html
> >
> > The tag is here:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.14RC1
> > (revision 1709237)
> >
> > Site:
> > http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
> >
> > will need to get adapted to mention support for 4.5, this can happen
> > during the time frame of the vote.
> >
> > Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, not before 0700 GMT
> > 21-Oct 2015
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> > [ ] +0 OK, but...
> > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Dominik Psenner <dp...@apache.org>.
Apologies, I've been terribly busy this week. Right now I'm on the way to a
birthday party and I hope that afterwards I'm (still) able to review the
release. Then we might start a new vote and see how it goes. Read you soon.
On 21 Oct 2015 4:54 p.m., "Jeremiah Gowdy" <je...@gowdy.me> wrote:
> +1 Release these artifacts
>
> > On Oct 17, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > log4net 1.2.14 RC1 is available for review here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
> > (revision 10847)
> >
> > Details of changes since 1.2.13 are in the release notes:
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html
> >
> > The tag is here:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.14RC1
> > (revision 1709237)
> >
> > Site:
> > http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
> >
> > will need to get adapted to mention support for 4.5, this can happen
> > during the time frame of the vote.
> >
> > Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, not before 0700 GMT
> > 21-Oct 2015
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> > [ ] +0 OK, but...
> > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Jeremiah Gowdy <je...@gowdy.me>.
+1 Release these artifacts
> On Oct 17, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> log4net 1.2.14 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
> (revision 10847)
>
> Details of changes since 1.2.13 are in the release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html
>
> The tag is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.14RC1
> (revision 1709237)
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/
>
> will need to get adapted to mention support for 4.5, this can happen
> during the time frame of the vote.
>
> Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, not before 0700 GMT
> 21-Oct 2015
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
>
>
[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.14 based on RC1
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
This vote has failed to attract enough votes but there is hope a new RC
will attract more votes (at least one more vote).
Stefan