You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by Sven Nold <Sv...@isb-ag.de> on 2014/09/03 09:10:24 UTC
flatpack dependency
Hi,
would it be possible to remove the dependency on org.apache.servicemix.bundles.flatpack and use flatpack itself in a higher version. I think the dependency on servicemix was only b/c flatpack wasn't a bundle?!
At least it should be updated from 3.2.X to 3.4.X...
I tried with exclusion of the servicemix and adding the flatpack dependency but it seems there was a change on the interface.
Or should we spawn a flatpack2 component?
Best regards,
Sven
RE: flatpack dependency
Posted by Sven Nold <Sv...@isb-ag.de>.
CAMEL 7776 filed with description
-----Original Message-----
From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ibsen@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 11:12 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: flatpack dependency
Okay if its already a bundle, then you are welcome to log a Camel ticket, and work on a patch to upgrade the component.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Sven Nold <Sv...@isb-ag.de> wrote:
> Hi
>
> As expected it won't be created because flatpack 3.4.X is already a bundle. So how to proceed?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sven Nold [mailto:Sven.Nold@isb-ag.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:28 AM
> To: dev@camel.apache.org
> Subject: RE: flatpack dependency
>
> Hi,
>
> filed under SMX4-1817
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ibsen@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:17 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: flatpack dependency
>
> Hi
>
> Log a ticket in SMX4 to ask for an OSGi bundle of a newer version of
> flatpack
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4
>
> Then we can upgrade Camel when the bundle is released
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Sven Nold <Sv...@isb-ag.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> would it be possible to remove the dependency on org.apache.servicemix.bundles.flatpack and use flatpack itself in a higher version. I think the dependency on servicemix was only b/c flatpack wasn't a bundle?!
>>
>> At least it should be updated from 3.2.X to 3.4.X...
>> I tried with exclusion of the servicemix and adding the flatpack dependency but it seems there was a change on the interface.
>>
>> Or should we spawn a flatpack2 component?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Sven
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Email: cibsen@redhat.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
> hawtio: http://hawt.io/
> fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
hawtio: http://hawt.io/
fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
Re: flatpack dependency
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Okay if its already a bundle, then you are welcome to log a Camel
ticket, and work on a patch to upgrade the component.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Sven Nold <Sv...@isb-ag.de> wrote:
> Hi
>
> As expected it won't be created because flatpack 3.4.X is already a bundle. So how to proceed?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sven Nold [mailto:Sven.Nold@isb-ag.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:28 AM
> To: dev@camel.apache.org
> Subject: RE: flatpack dependency
>
> Hi,
>
> filed under SMX4-1817
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ibsen@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:17 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: flatpack dependency
>
> Hi
>
> Log a ticket in SMX4 to ask for an OSGi bundle of a newer version of flatpack
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4
>
> Then we can upgrade Camel when the bundle is released
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Sven Nold <Sv...@isb-ag.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> would it be possible to remove the dependency on org.apache.servicemix.bundles.flatpack and use flatpack itself in a higher version. I think the dependency on servicemix was only b/c flatpack wasn't a bundle?!
>>
>> At least it should be updated from 3.2.X to 3.4.X...
>> I tried with exclusion of the servicemix and adding the flatpack dependency but it seems there was a change on the interface.
>>
>> Or should we spawn a flatpack2 component?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Sven
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Email: cibsen@redhat.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
> hawtio: http://hawt.io/
> fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
hawtio: http://hawt.io/
fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
RE: flatpack dependency
Posted by Sven Nold <Sv...@isb-ag.de>.
Hi
As expected it won't be created because flatpack 3.4.X is already a bundle. So how to proceed?
-----Original Message-----
From: Sven Nold [mailto:Sven.Nold@isb-ag.de]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:28 AM
To: dev@camel.apache.org
Subject: RE: flatpack dependency
Hi,
filed under SMX4-1817
-----Original Message-----
From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ibsen@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:17 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: flatpack dependency
Hi
Log a ticket in SMX4 to ask for an OSGi bundle of a newer version of flatpack
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4
Then we can upgrade Camel when the bundle is released
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Sven Nold <Sv...@isb-ag.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> would it be possible to remove the dependency on org.apache.servicemix.bundles.flatpack and use flatpack itself in a higher version. I think the dependency on servicemix was only b/c flatpack wasn't a bundle?!
>
> At least it should be updated from 3.2.X to 3.4.X...
> I tried with exclusion of the servicemix and adding the flatpack dependency but it seems there was a change on the interface.
>
> Or should we spawn a flatpack2 component?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sven
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
hawtio: http://hawt.io/
fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
RE: flatpack dependency
Posted by Sven Nold <Sv...@isb-ag.de>.
Hi,
filed under SMX4-1817
-----Original Message-----
From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ibsen@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:17 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: flatpack dependency
Hi
Log a ticket in SMX4 to ask for an OSGi bundle of a newer version of flatpack
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4
Then we can upgrade Camel when the bundle is released
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Sven Nold <Sv...@isb-ag.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> would it be possible to remove the dependency on org.apache.servicemix.bundles.flatpack and use flatpack itself in a higher version. I think the dependency on servicemix was only b/c flatpack wasn't a bundle?!
>
> At least it should be updated from 3.2.X to 3.4.X...
> I tried with exclusion of the servicemix and adding the flatpack dependency but it seems there was a change on the interface.
>
> Or should we spawn a flatpack2 component?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sven
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
hawtio: http://hawt.io/
fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
Re: flatpack dependency
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi
Log a ticket in SMX4 to ask for an OSGi bundle of a newer version of flatpack
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4
Then we can upgrade Camel when the bundle is released
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Sven Nold <Sv...@isb-ag.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> would it be possible to remove the dependency on org.apache.servicemix.bundles.flatpack and use flatpack itself in a higher version. I think the dependency on servicemix was only b/c flatpack wasn't a bundle?!
>
> At least it should be updated from 3.2.X to 3.4.X...
> I tried with exclusion of the servicemix and adding the flatpack dependency but it seems there was a change on the interface.
>
> Or should we spawn a flatpack2 component?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sven
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
hawtio: http://hawt.io/
fabric8: http://fabric8.io/