You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Andy Joslin <an...@ri3k.com> on 2002/11/15 10:31:34 UTC

External-Link Hotspot Offset Problem FOP 0.20.4

Hi All

I was wondering if there was a standard workaround for the problem of
the fo:basic-link hotspot displaying in the wrong position (approx 2-3cm
above where the link should be).

I'm using FOP 0.20.4, and have seen a bugfix relating to this, so does
anyone have experience of getting this issue resolved and working in FOP
0.20.4 ?


regards


Andy

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail and its attachments are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, please telephone or e-mail us immediately, delete this message from your system and do not read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use this e-mail message and any attachments. 

Although ri3k Limited believes this e-mail and any attachments to be free of any virus or other defect which may affect your computer, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and ri3k Limited does not accept any responsibility for any loss or damage in any way from its use.

ri3k Limited
Registered in England: 10-12 Ely Place, London, EC1N 6RY
Company Number: 3909745

Re: External-Link Hotspot Offset Problem FOP 0.20.4

Posted by Christian Geisert <ch...@isu-gmbh.de>.
Andy Joslin wrote:
> Hi All
> 
> I was wondering if there was a standard workaround for the problem of
> the fo:basic-link hotspot displaying in the wrong position (approx 2-3cm
> above where the link should be).

There's no standard workaround it depends on your document.
Maybe avoiding padding helps..

> I'm using FOP 0.20.4, and have seen a bugfix relating to this, so does
> anyone have experience of getting this issue resolved and working in FOP
> 0.20.4 ?

This bug is fixed in CVS.
So you could either checkout the source and compile FOP yourself or
wait some days for the 0.20.5 release candidate (tester are welcome ;-)

Christian

P.S. It's unnecessary cross-posting this question to fop-dev