You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by rp...@apache.org on 2009/06/20 15:54:24 UTC

svn commit: r786825 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Author: rpluem
Date: Sat Jun 20 13:54:23 2009
New Revision: 786825

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=786825&view=rev
Log:
* Add comment

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=786825&r1=786824&r2=786825&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Sat Jun 20 13:54:23 2009
@@ -127,6 +127,10 @@
    patch is too strict for a stable line and may "break" broken
    configs thought by their users to be working.
    +1: niq
+   rpluem says: Your 2.2.x doesn't compile because it must be
+   APLOG_WARNING instead of APLOG_WARN, but if you take
+   http://people.apache.org/~rpluem/patches/foreign_patches/niq_44020.diff
+   which fixes this I am +1.
 
 PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED

Re: svn commit: r786825 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.


On 06/20/2009 03:54 PM, rpluem@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rpluem
> Date: Sat Jun 20 13:54:23 2009
> New Revision: 786825
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=786825&view=rev
> Log:
> * Add comment
> 
> Modified:
>     httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> 
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=786825&r1=786824&r2=786825&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Sat Jun 20 13:54:23 2009
> @@ -127,6 +127,10 @@
>     patch is too strict for a stable line and may "break" broken
>     configs thought by their users to be working.
>     +1: niq
> +   rpluem says: Your 2.2.x doesn't compile because it must be
> +   APLOG_WARNING instead of APLOG_WARN, but if you take
> +   http://people.apache.org/~rpluem/patches/foreign_patches/niq_44020.diff
> +   which fixes this I am +1.

If Nick and someone else could have a look here I guess then we are very good set
patch wise for a release.

Regards

Rüdiger