You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@continuum.apache.org by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> on 2008/11/25 05:14:54 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.3.0 as Milestone 1
On the Continuum 1.3 trunk, we have two new features completed --
transient state so that Continuum doesn't repeatedly send emails if
the scm system is down, and the migration to Struts 2 as the
underlying web framework. I'd like to release 1.3.0 as Milestone 1 to
get these new features into users' hands.
The binaries, sources, checksums, signatures, docs and staging repo
can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.3.0
The release notes are available in the staged site:
http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.3.0/docs/release-notes.html
(I made a mistake in updating the release notes to say 'Milestone 1',
since we should determine the classifier during the vote. For example
it's possible that we might decide this is only an Alpha instead of a
Milestone. I've fixed that on trunk for next time.)
Test results and votes are welcome from everyone in the community.
There are too many combinations of operating systems, scm repositories
and project types for any one person to test, so please try it out in
your environment and let us know what you find-- good or bad.
Once you've had a chance to review it, please vote
[ ] +1 Release it as Milestone 1!
[ ] +/- 0
[ ] -1 It should not be released as Milestone 1 because...
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Assuming all goes well
I'll tally the vote and finish up on Friday. However, let me know if
you need more time.
Thanks,
--
Wendy Smoak
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.3.0 as Milestone 1
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
We have this problem every new version.
Perhaps it's time we veto commits that change the database without
updating the migration tool at the same time?
- Brett
On 07/12/2008, at 11:34 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> Existing users should probably stay on 1.2 until 1.3 goes GA... and I
> agree we need a database migration tool prior to a 1.3 GA.
>
> I still don't see why the lack of a migration tool has to hold up a
> milestone, but obviously that's the consensus, so I'll cancel this one
> and remove the binaries.
>
> --
> Wendy
>
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Emmanuel Venisse
> <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Same comments for me and I think it will be the same for actual
>> users.
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Sorry for late response.
>>> My main concern is to have a database migration tool.
>>> Because here I cannot start a 1.3 with a 1.2 database (I didn't test
>>> the current tool maybe it can help).
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.3.0 as Milestone 1
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
Existing users should probably stay on 1.2 until 1.3 goes GA... and I
agree we need a database migration tool prior to a 1.3 GA.
I still don't see why the lack of a migration tool has to hold up a
milestone, but obviously that's the consensus, so I'll cancel this one
and remove the binaries.
--
Wendy
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Emmanuel Venisse
<em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Same comments for me and I think it will be the same for actual users.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Sorry for late response.
>> My main concern is to have a database migration tool.
>> Because here I cannot start a 1.3 with a 1.2 database (I didn't test
>> the current tool maybe it can help).
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.3.0 as Milestone 1
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
Same comments for me and I think it will be the same for actual users.
Emmanuel
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry for late response.
> My main concern is to have a database migration tool.
> Because here I cannot start a 1.3 with a 1.2 database (I didn't test
> the current tool maybe it can help).
>
> --
> Olivier
>
> 2008/12/1 Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>:
> > I wasn't planning to cancel it, (but I also have a "refuses to send
> > email" note to check out further. So if you've tested it and are
> > content with it being labeled Milestone 1, please vote. :) I am
> > curious if my comment about the problems caused the lack of response,
> > or if there's something else going on... -Wendy
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> Does this mean you're canceling the vote?
> >>
> >> On 28/11/2008, at 8:46 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >>
> >>> IMO, certainly prefer not, but not a blocker, especially if documented.
> I
> >>> expect them to be designated as pre-release and not the main download
> on the
> >>> web site anyway.
> >>>
> >>> - Brett
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.3.0 as Milestone 1
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Sorry for late response.
My main concern is to have a database migration tool.
Because here I cannot start a 1.3 with a 1.2 database (I didn't test
the current tool maybe it can help).
--
Olivier
2008/12/1 Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>:
> I wasn't planning to cancel it, (but I also have a "refuses to send
> email" note to check out further. So if you've tested it and are
> content with it being labeled Milestone 1, please vote. :) I am
> curious if my comment about the problems caused the lack of response,
> or if there's something else going on... -Wendy
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Does this mean you're canceling the vote?
>>
>> On 28/11/2008, at 8:46 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>
>>> IMO, certainly prefer not, but not a blocker, especially if documented. I
>>> expect them to be designated as pre-release and not the main download on the
>>> web site anyway.
>>>
>>> - Brett
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.3.0 as Milestone 1
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
I wasn't planning to cancel it, (but I also have a "refuses to send
email" note to check out further. So if you've tested it and are
content with it being labeled Milestone 1, please vote. :) I am
curious if my comment about the problems caused the lack of response,
or if there's something else going on... -Wendy
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Does this mean you're canceling the vote?
>
> On 28/11/2008, at 8:46 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>> IMO, certainly prefer not, but not a blocker, especially if documented. I
>> expect them to be designated as pre-release and not the main download on the
>> web site anyway.
>>
>> - Brett
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.3.0 as Milestone 1
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
Does this mean you're canceling the vote?
On 28/11/2008, at 8:46 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> IMO, certainly prefer not, but not a blocker, especially if
> documented. I expect them to be designated as pre-release and not
> the main download on the web site anyway.
>
> - Brett
>
> On 28/11/2008, at 3:50 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>
>> I've found a couple of problems -- some validation error messages
>> have
>> gone missing, and you can't delete users. The latter will probably
>> have to be fixed in Redback.
>>
>> Thoughts on whether that's a big enough problem to prevent releasing
>> this as a Milestone?
>>
>> I have an idea of what I expect in Alpha and Beta software, but I'm
>> still forming an opinion on Milestones. Do we allow minor
>> regressions
>> in Milestones?
>>
>> --
>> Wendy
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Once you've had a chance to review it, please vote
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release it as Milestone 1!
>>> [ ] +/- 0
>>> [ ] -1 It should not be released as Milestone 1 because...
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.3.0 as Milestone 1
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
IMO, certainly prefer not, but not a blocker, especially if
documented. I expect them to be designated as pre-release and not the
main download on the web site anyway.
- Brett
On 28/11/2008, at 3:50 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> I've found a couple of problems -- some validation error messages have
> gone missing, and you can't delete users. The latter will probably
> have to be fixed in Redback.
>
> Thoughts on whether that's a big enough problem to prevent releasing
> this as a Milestone?
>
> I have an idea of what I expect in Alpha and Beta software, but I'm
> still forming an opinion on Milestones. Do we allow minor regressions
> in Milestones?
>
> --
> Wendy
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Once you've had a chance to review it, please vote
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release it as Milestone 1!
>> [ ] +/- 0
>> [ ] -1 It should not be released as Milestone 1 because...
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.3.0 as Milestone 1
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
I've found a couple of problems -- some validation error messages have
gone missing, and you can't delete users. The latter will probably
have to be fixed in Redback.
Thoughts on whether that's a big enough problem to prevent releasing
this as a Milestone?
I have an idea of what I expect in Alpha and Beta software, but I'm
still forming an opinion on Milestones. Do we allow minor regressions
in Milestones?
--
Wendy
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Once you've had a chance to review it, please vote
>
> [ ] +1 Release it as Milestone 1!
> [ ] +/- 0
> [ ] -1 It should not be released as Milestone 1 because...