You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> on 2006/01/07 14:05:45 UTC

Re: LGPL Hibernate - legal issue

It seems that this problem was never handled ?

Mvgr,
Martin

Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2005, at 12:16 PM, paksegu wrote:
> 
>> Actually I just wanted to know since this came up in Roller blog 
>> server project that is under Apache Incubator. Not trying to cause any 
>> problems.
> 
> 
> No worries -- you ended up pointing out a problem in Jackrabbit
> contrib that I wasn't aware of, so it was an appropriate comment.
> 
> ....Roy
> 
> 
> 

Re: LGPL Hibernate - legal issue

Posted by "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>.
On Jan 7, 2006, at 5:05 AM, Martin van den Bemt wrote:

> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> On Nov 7, 2005, at 12:16 PM, paksegu wrote:
>>> Actually I just wanted to know since this came up in Roller blog  
>>> server project that is under Apache Incubator. Not trying to  
>>> cause any problems.
>> No worries -- you ended up pointing out a problem in Jackrabbit
>> contrib that I wasn't aware of, so it was an appropriate comment.

> It seems that this problem was never handled ?

It was "handled" in the sense that we decided it can't be released
by Apache.  It is still okay as an example for documentation, though
we need to fix the inappropriate usage of trademarks in package names.
That is still on the "to do" list.

....Roy