You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> on 2011/09/05 17:13:39 UTC
[CHAIN][VOTE] accept the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
Hi all guys,
thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
push a next release soon.
We are in the middle of discussing about the current/improved design,
maintaining - or not - the retro-compatibility, better modularization
- splitting the chain in submodules - and so on, so as you maybe
noticed latest ML activity looks like there is a renewed interest from
both committers and users that came back to submit contributions.
You would be maybe interested on see which level of
retro-compatibility we maintained after the update, by reading the
Clirr report[2] published on my personal ASF space.
So we are interested on releasing that code and our proposal is to
move the current trunk in a 1.x branch and move the 2.0 work in trunk,
please cast your vote:
[+1] let's make the branch the code we want to see released as new chain
[+/- 0] feel free to express opinions
[-1] because...
Feedbacks are, obviously, welcome.
Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
Simo
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/chain/branches/version-2.0-work
[2] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [CHAIN][VOTE] accept the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
my +1
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
> branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
> push a next release soon.
> We are in the middle of discussing about the current/improved design,
> maintaining - or not - the retro-compatibility, better modularization
> - splitting the chain in submodules - and so on, so as you maybe
> noticed latest ML activity looks like there is a renewed interest from
> both committers and users that came back to submit contributions.
> You would be maybe interested on see which level of
> retro-compatibility we maintained after the update, by reading the
> Clirr report[2] published on my personal ASF space.
> So we are interested on releasing that code and our proposal is to
> move the current trunk in a 1.x branch and move the 2.0 work in trunk,
> please cast your vote:
>
> [+1] let's make the branch the code we want to see released as new chain
> [+/- 0] feel free to express opinions
> [-1] because...
>
> Feedbacks are, obviously, welcome.
> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
> Simo
>
> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/chain/branches/version-2.0-work
> [2] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][CHAIN][VOTE] accept the 2.0-work brach as proper
codebase in /trunk
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
great, looking forward for more contributions Paul!!!
thanks a lot, have a nice day!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org> wrote:
> Here's my +1 non-binding.
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> The proposal of making the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
>> for the [chain] component passes with 3 +1 binding votes from
>>
>> * Simone Tripodi
>> * James Carman
>> * Matt Benson
>>
>> no other votes have been casted.
>>
>> I'm going to move the current trunk in a 1.X branch, and the 2.0-work in trunk.
>> Thanks for participating, all the best!
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Simone Tripodi
>>> <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi all guys,
>>>> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
>>>> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
>>>> branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
>>>> push a next release soon.
>>>> We are in the middle of discussing about the current/improved design,
>>>> maintaining - or not - the retro-compatibility, better modularization
>>>> - splitting the chain in submodules - and so on, so as you maybe
>>>> noticed latest ML activity looks like there is a renewed interest from
>>>> both committers and users that came back to submit contributions.
>>>> You would be maybe interested on see which level of
>>>> retro-compatibility we maintained after the update, by reading the
>>>> Clirr report[2] published on my personal ASF space.
>>>> So we are interested on releasing that code and our proposal is to
>>>> move the current trunk in a 1.x branch and move the 2.0 work in trunk,
>>>> please cast your vote:
>>>>
>>>> [+1] let's make the branch the code we want to see released as new chain
>>>> [+/- 0] feel free to express opinions
>>>> [-1] because...
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Feedbacks are, obviously, welcome.
>>>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
>>>> Simo
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/chain/branches/version-2.0-work
>>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT][CHAIN][VOTE] accept the 2.0-work brach as proper
codebase in /trunk
Posted by Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org>.
Here's my +1 non-binding.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
> The proposal of making the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
> for the [chain] component passes with 3 +1 binding votes from
>
> * Simone Tripodi
> * James Carman
> * Matt Benson
>
> no other votes have been casted.
>
> I'm going to move the current trunk in a 1.X branch, and the 2.0-work in trunk.
> Thanks for participating, all the best!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Simone Tripodi
>> <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi all guys,
>>> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
>>> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
>>> branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
>>> push a next release soon.
>>> We are in the middle of discussing about the current/improved design,
>>> maintaining - or not - the retro-compatibility, better modularization
>>> - splitting the chain in submodules - and so on, so as you maybe
>>> noticed latest ML activity looks like there is a renewed interest from
>>> both committers and users that came back to submit contributions.
>>> You would be maybe interested on see which level of
>>> retro-compatibility we maintained after the update, by reading the
>>> Clirr report[2] published on my personal ASF space.
>>> So we are interested on releasing that code and our proposal is to
>>> move the current trunk in a 1.x branch and move the 2.0 work in trunk,
>>> please cast your vote:
>>>
>>> [+1] let's make the branch the code we want to see released as new chain
>>> [+/- 0] feel free to express opinions
>>> [-1] because...
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>>
>>> Feedbacks are, obviously, welcome.
>>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
>>> Simo
>>>
>>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/chain/branches/version-2.0-work
>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
[RESULT][CHAIN][VOTE] accept the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
Hi all,
The proposal of making the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
for the [chain] component passes with 3 +1 binding votes from
* Simone Tripodi
* James Carman
* Matt Benson
no other votes have been casted.
I'm going to move the current trunk in a 1.X branch, and the 2.0-work in trunk.
Thanks for participating, all the best!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Simone Tripodi
> <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
>> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
>> branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
>> push a next release soon.
>> We are in the middle of discussing about the current/improved design,
>> maintaining - or not - the retro-compatibility, better modularization
>> - splitting the chain in submodules - and so on, so as you maybe
>> noticed latest ML activity looks like there is a renewed interest from
>> both committers and users that came back to submit contributions.
>> You would be maybe interested on see which level of
>> retro-compatibility we maintained after the update, by reading the
>> Clirr report[2] published on my personal ASF space.
>> So we are interested on releasing that code and our proposal is to
>> move the current trunk in a 1.x branch and move the 2.0 work in trunk,
>> please cast your vote:
>>
>> [+1] let's make the branch the code we want to see released as new chain
>> [+/- 0] feel free to express opinions
>> [-1] because...
>
> +1
>
> Matt
>
>>
>> Feedbacks are, obviously, welcome.
>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
>> Simo
>>
>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/chain/branches/version-2.0-work
>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [CHAIN][VOTE] accept the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Simone Tripodi
<si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
> branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
> push a next release soon.
> We are in the middle of discussing about the current/improved design,
> maintaining - or not - the retro-compatibility, better modularization
> - splitting the chain in submodules - and so on, so as you maybe
> noticed latest ML activity looks like there is a renewed interest from
> both committers and users that came back to submit contributions.
> You would be maybe interested on see which level of
> retro-compatibility we maintained after the update, by reading the
> Clirr report[2] published on my personal ASF space.
> So we are interested on releasing that code and our proposal is to
> move the current trunk in a 1.x branch and move the 2.0 work in trunk,
> please cast your vote:
>
> [+1] let's make the branch the code we want to see released as new chain
> [+/- 0] feel free to express opinions
> [-1] because...
+1
Matt
>
> Feedbacks are, obviously, welcome.
> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
> Simo
>
> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/chain/branches/version-2.0-work
> [2] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [CHAIN][VOTE] accept the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
Posted by James Carman <jc...@carmanconsulting.com>.
+1
Sent from tablet device. Please excuse typos and brevity.
On Sep 7, 2011 4:27 AM, "Simone Tripodi" <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
> just to remind that vote closes on Thu 8 Sept on 3:13 PM GMT, please
> cast your votes! :)
> Many thanks in advance, all the best!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>
wrote:
>> Hi Jochen!
>> we still haven't because, as emerged in the past discussions, actual
>> modifications can still be considered acceptable in therms of
>> retro-compatibility.
>> Anyway, we are also in the middle of discussions about API redesign,
>> and breaking the 1.X compatibility, so we will update those metadata
>> as soon as that compatibility is broken.
>> Thanks for the reminders!
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:37 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 5 September 2011 16:33, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> Housework check:
>>>>
>>>> - Has the package name been changed?
>>>> A- Has thae Maven groupId aand/or artifactId been changed?
>>>
>>> I'd strongly recommend leaving these changes until just before release
>>> - it's much easier to run Clirr if the package name has not been
>>> changed.
>>>
>>>> DAOes t<he <s
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Simone Tripodi <
simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Hi all guys,
>>>>> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
>>>>> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
>>>>> branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
>>>>> push a next release soon.
>>>>> We are in the middle of discussing about the current/improved design,
>>>>> maintaining - or not - the retro-compatibility, better modularization
>>>>> - splitting the chain in submodules - and so on, so as you maybe
>>>>> noticed latest ML activity looks like there is a renewed interest from
>>>>> both committers and users that came back to submit contributions.
>>>>> You would be maybe interested on see which level of
>>>>> retro-compatibility we maintained after the update, by reading the
>>>>> Clirr report[2] published on my personal ASF space.
>>>>> So we are interested on releasing that code and our proposal is to
>>>>> move the current trunk in a 1.x branch and move the 2.0 work in trunk,
>>>>> please cast your vote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [+1] let's make the branch the code we want to see released as new
chain
>>>>> [+/- 0] feel free to express opinions
>>>>> [-1] because...
>>>>>
>>>>> Feedbacks are, obviously, welcome.
>>>>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
>>>>> Simo
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/chain/branches/version-2.0-work
>>>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
>>>> will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of
>>>> everyone.
>>>>
>>>> John Maynard Keynes (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Keynes)
>>>>
>>>> https://linuxcounter.net/user/221257.html
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
Re: [CHAIN][VOTE] accept the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
Hi all,
just to remind that vote closes on Thu 8 Sept on 3:13 PM GMT, please
cast your votes! :)
Many thanks in advance, all the best!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Jochen!
> we still haven't because, as emerged in the past discussions, actual
> modifications can still be considered acceptable in therms of
> retro-compatibility.
> Anyway, we are also in the middle of discussions about API redesign,
> and breaking the 1.X compatibility, so we will update those metadata
> as soon as that compatibility is broken.
> Thanks for the reminders!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:37 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 5 September 2011 16:33, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Housework check:
>>>
>>> - Has the package name been changed?
>>> A- Has thae Maven groupId aand/or artifactId been changed?
>>
>> I'd strongly recommend leaving these changes until just before release
>> - it's much easier to run Clirr if the package name has not been
>> changed.
>>
>>> DAOes t<he <s
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi all guys,
>>>> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
>>>> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
>>>> branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
>>>> push a next release soon.
>>>> We are in the middle of discussing about the current/improved design,
>>>> maintaining - or not - the retro-compatibility, better modularization
>>>> - splitting the chain in submodules - and so on, so as you maybe
>>>> noticed latest ML activity looks like there is a renewed interest from
>>>> both committers and users that came back to submit contributions.
>>>> You would be maybe interested on see which level of
>>>> retro-compatibility we maintained after the update, by reading the
>>>> Clirr report[2] published on my personal ASF space.
>>>> So we are interested on releasing that code and our proposal is to
>>>> move the current trunk in a 1.x branch and move the 2.0 work in trunk,
>>>> please cast your vote:
>>>>
>>>> [+1] let's make the branch the code we want to see released as new chain
>>>> [+/- 0] feel free to express opinions
>>>> [-1] because...
>>>>
>>>> Feedbacks are, obviously, welcome.
>>>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
>>>> Simo
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/chain/branches/version-2.0-work
>>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
>>> will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of
>>> everyone.
>>>
>>> John Maynard Keynes (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Keynes)
>>>
>>> https://linuxcounter.net/user/221257.html
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [CHAIN][VOTE] accept the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
Hi Jochen!
we still haven't because, as emerged in the past discussions, actual
modifications can still be considered acceptable in therms of
retro-compatibility.
Anyway, we are also in the middle of discussions about API redesign,
and breaking the 1.X compatibility, so we will update those metadata
as soon as that compatibility is broken.
Thanks for the reminders!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:37 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5 September 2011 16:33, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Housework check:
>>
>> - Has the package name been changed?
>> A- Has thae Maven groupId aand/or artifactId been changed?
>
> I'd strongly recommend leaving these changes until just before release
> - it's much easier to run Clirr if the package name has not been
> changed.
>
>> DAOes t<he <s
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi all guys,
>>> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
>>> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
>>> branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
>>> push a next release soon.
>>> We are in the middle of discussing about the current/improved design,
>>> maintaining - or not - the retro-compatibility, better modularization
>>> - splitting the chain in submodules - and so on, so as you maybe
>>> noticed latest ML activity looks like there is a renewed interest from
>>> both committers and users that came back to submit contributions.
>>> You would be maybe interested on see which level of
>>> retro-compatibility we maintained after the update, by reading the
>>> Clirr report[2] published on my personal ASF space.
>>> So we are interested on releasing that code and our proposal is to
>>> move the current trunk in a 1.x branch and move the 2.0 work in trunk,
>>> please cast your vote:
>>>
>>> [+1] let's make the branch the code we want to see released as new chain
>>> [+/- 0] feel free to express opinions
>>> [-1] because...
>>>
>>> Feedbacks are, obviously, welcome.
>>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
>>> Simo
>>>
>>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/chain/branches/version-2.0-work
>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
>> will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of
>> everyone.
>>
>> John Maynard Keynes (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Keynes)
>>
>> https://linuxcounter.net/user/221257.html
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [CHAIN][VOTE] accept the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 5 September 2011 16:33, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Housework check:
>
> - Has the package name been changed?
> A- Has thae Maven groupId aand/or artifactId been changed?
I'd strongly recommend leaving these changes until just before release
- it's much easier to run Clirr if the package name has not been
changed.
> DAOes t<he <s
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
>> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
>> branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
>> push a next release soon.
>> We are in the middle of discussing about the current/improved design,
>> maintaining - or not - the retro-compatibility, better modularization
>> - splitting the chain in submodules - and so on, so as you maybe
>> noticed latest ML activity looks like there is a renewed interest from
>> both committers and users that came back to submit contributions.
>> You would be maybe interested on see which level of
>> retro-compatibility we maintained after the update, by reading the
>> Clirr report[2] published on my personal ASF space.
>> So we are interested on releasing that code and our proposal is to
>> move the current trunk in a 1.x branch and move the 2.0 work in trunk,
>> please cast your vote:
>>
>> [+1] let's make the branch the code we want to see released as new chain
>> [+/- 0] feel free to express opinions
>> [-1] because...
>>
>> Feedbacks are, obviously, welcome.
>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
>> Simo
>>
>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/chain/branches/version-2.0-work
>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
> will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of
> everyone.
>
> John Maynard Keynes (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Keynes)
>
> https://linuxcounter.net/user/221257.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [CHAIN][VOTE] accept the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
Housework check:
- Has the package name been changed?
A- Has thae Maven groupId aand/or artifactId been changed?
DAOes t<he <s
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a
> group of Commons committers started working on that component in a
> branch 2.0[1] to experiment updates and study improvements in order to
> push a next release soon.
> We are in the middle of discussing about the current/improved design,
> maintaining - or not - the retro-compatibility, better modularization
> - splitting the chain in submodules - and so on, so as you maybe
> noticed latest ML activity looks like there is a renewed interest from
> both committers and users that came back to submit contributions.
> You would be maybe interested on see which level of
> retro-compatibility we maintained after the update, by reading the
> Clirr report[2] published on my personal ASF space.
> So we are interested on releasing that code and our proposal is to
> move the current trunk in a 1.x branch and move the 2.0 work in trunk,
> please cast your vote:
>
> [+1] let's make the branch the code we want to see released as new chain
> [+/- 0] feel free to express opinions
> [-1] because...
>
> Feedbacks are, obviously, welcome.
> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
> Simo
>
> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/chain/branches/version-2.0-work
> [2] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/chain/clirr-report.html
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of
everyone.
John Maynard Keynes (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Keynes)
https://linuxcounter.net/user/221257.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org