You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by "Olle Hallin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/12/08 14:33:18 UTC

[jira] Commented: (TAP5-945) Lock contention in PerthreadManagerImpl

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787453#action_12787453 ] 

Olle Hallin commented on TAP5-945:
----------------------------------

We tested with 1000 virtual users and 300 Tomcat threads.


> Lock contention in PerthreadManagerImpl
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAP5-945
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-945
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tapestry-core
>    Affects Versions: 5.1.0.5
>            Reporter: Olle Hallin
>            Priority: Minor
>
> When load testing our new high-volume site before soft launch, we found that we have severe lock contention in org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.services.PerthreadManagerImpl.
> It synchronizes on "this" before invoking ThreadLocal.get() and ThreadLocal.remove(), which I believe is unnecessary. 
> During our tests, approximately  35% of all Tomcat threads were waiting for this lock in any of 10 thread dumps taken 15 seconds apart.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.