You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com> on 2009/12/21 23:39:10 UTC
[VOTE] Release build 6.0.21
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21/
According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Jean-Frederic
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21
Posted by Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>.
On 12/22/2009 10:11 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 12/22/2009 09:28 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> Up till now we always had tcnative-1.dll not libtcnative-1.dll
>>> so it's just broken build comming from private builds,
>>> because there is no 1.1.18 binaries in w.a.o/dist/
>>> Meaning:
>>> 1. Wrong tcnative
>>> 2. Build is not reproducable
>>>
>>> I'd say the packaging is broken, not the 6.0.21 itself.
>>
>> So nothing prevent from a release of 6.0.21 ?
>
> I just have to redo the package and produce the missing tcnative-1.dlls.
>
Right, just make a notice when you do, since we are
voting both for a tag and RM's (you) binaries.
Cheers
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@apache.org>.
On Dec 22, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/12/2009 09:11, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 12/22/2009 09:28 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>>> Up till now we always had tcnative-1.dll not libtcnative-1.dll
>>>> so it's just broken build comming from private builds,
>>>> because there is no 1.1.18 binaries in w.a.o/dist/
>>>> Meaning:
>>>> 1. Wrong tcnative
>>>> 2. Build is not reproducable
>>>>
>>>> I'd say the packaging is broken, not the 6.0.21 itself.
>>>
>>> So nothing prevent from a release of 6.0.21 ?
>>
>> I just have to redo the package and produce the missing tcnative-1.dlls.
>
> You'll need to revert some of the changes you made to the tag as well.
> It might be cleaner to create a new tag. i.e.
> - delete the current 6.0.21 tag
> - set the version in 6.0.x/trunk
> - tag 6.0.21
> - reset the version in 6.0.x/trunk
> - regenerate the release candidate
>
> Only a thought though. As long as the source tarball we vote on a)
> matches the tag and b) can be used to generate the release binaries
> everything else is academic.
>
+1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21
Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>.
On 12/22/2009 10:32 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/12/2009 09:11, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 12/22/2009 09:28 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>>> Up till now we always had tcnative-1.dll not libtcnative-1.dll
>>>> so it's just broken build comming from private builds,
>>>> because there is no 1.1.18 binaries in w.a.o/dist/
>>>> Meaning:
>>>> 1. Wrong tcnative
>>>> 2. Build is not reproducable
>>>>
>>>> I'd say the packaging is broken, not the 6.0.21 itself.
>>>
>>> So nothing prevent from a release of 6.0.21 ?
>>
>> I just have to redo the package and produce the missing tcnative-1.dlls.
>
> You'll need to revert some of the changes you made to the tag as well.
I have reverted the bad changes.
> It might be cleaner to create a new tag. i.e.
> - delete the current 6.0.21 tag
> - set the version in 6.0.x/trunk
> - tag 6.0.21
> - reset the version in 6.0.x/trunk
> - regenerate the release candidate
>
> Only a thought though. As long as the source tarball we vote on a)
> matches the tag and b) can be used to generate the release binaries
> everything else is academic.
Yep I will redo the production of the tarballs and others.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 22/12/2009 09:11, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 12/22/2009 09:28 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> Up till now we always had tcnative-1.dll not libtcnative-1.dll
>>> so it's just broken build comming from private builds,
>>> because there is no 1.1.18 binaries in w.a.o/dist/
>>> Meaning:
>>> 1. Wrong tcnative
>>> 2. Build is not reproducable
>>>
>>> I'd say the packaging is broken, not the 6.0.21 itself.
>>
>> So nothing prevent from a release of 6.0.21 ?
>
> I just have to redo the package and produce the missing tcnative-1.dlls.
You'll need to revert some of the changes you made to the tag as well.
It might be cleaner to create a new tag. i.e.
- delete the current 6.0.21 tag
- set the version in 6.0.x/trunk
- tag 6.0.21
- reset the version in 6.0.x/trunk
- regenerate the release candidate
Only a thought though. As long as the source tarball we vote on a)
matches the tag and b) can be used to generate the release binaries
everything else is academic.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21
Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>.
On 12/22/2009 09:28 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> Up till now we always had tcnative-1.dll not libtcnative-1.dll
>> so it's just broken build comming from private builds,
>> because there is no 1.1.18 binaries in w.a.o/dist/
>> Meaning:
>> 1. Wrong tcnative
>> 2. Build is not reproducable
>>
>> I'd say the packaging is broken, not the 6.0.21 itself.
>
> So nothing prevent from a release of 6.0.21 ?
I just have to redo the package and produce the missing tcnative-1.dlls.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21
Posted by Henri Gomez <he...@gmail.com>.
> Up till now we always had tcnative-1.dll not libtcnative-1.dll
> so it's just broken build comming from private builds,
> because there is no 1.1.18 binaries in w.a.o/dist/
> Meaning:
> 1. Wrong tcnative
> 2. Build is not reproducable
>
> I'd say the packaging is broken, not the 6.0.21 itself.
So nothing prevent from a release of 6.0.21 ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21
Posted by Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>.
On 12/22/2009 08:15 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Mladen Turk wrote:
>> On 12/21/2009 11:39 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21/
>>>
>>> According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is:
>>> [X] Broken
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [ ] Stable
>>>
>>
>> tcnative-1.dll in the zips is build with dynamically
>> linked apr and ssl which is wrong.
>> tcnative-1 must have apr and ssl statically linked
>> while libtcnative-1 is dynamically linked.
>> Either it won't work on client boxes or it'll pick
>> up the random libapr-1.dll from the users PATH
>
> It will pick up the libapr-1.dll side-by-side with the .jni
> stub, AIUI, unless I'm horribly mistaken. Did you confirm this?
>
From where it'll pick the libapr-1.dll ?
On my box it pick the one from SVN cause it happens I have it
in the PATH, however it won't get picked in service mode, cause
I have not that in system PATH.
Up till now we always had tcnative-1.dll not libtcnative-1.dll
so it's just broken build comming from private builds,
because there is no 1.1.18 binaries in w.a.o/dist/
Meaning:
1. Wrong tcnative
2. Build is not reproducable
I'd say the packaging is broken, not the 6.0.21 itself.
Regards
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21
Posted by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 12/21/2009 11:39 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is:
>> [X] Broken
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [ ] Stable
>>
>
> tcnative-1.dll in the zips is build with dynamically
> linked apr and ssl which is wrong.
> tcnative-1 must have apr and ssl statically linked
> while libtcnative-1 is dynamically linked.
> Either it won't work on client boxes or it'll pick
> up the random libapr-1.dll from the users PATH
It will pick up the libapr-1.dll side-by-side with the .jni
stub, AIUI, unless I'm horribly mistaken. Did you confirm this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21
Posted by Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>.
On 12/21/2009 11:39 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is:
> [X] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Stable
>
tcnative-1.dll in the zips is build with dynamically
linked apr and ssl which is wrong.
tcnative-1 must have apr and ssl statically linked
while libtcnative-1 is dynamically linked.
Either it won't work on client boxes or it'll pick
up the random libapr-1.dll from the users PATH
Regards
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org