You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org by Stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2010/04/06 06:51:37 UTC

[MOTION PASSED, VOTE CLOSED] WAS -> Re: [VOTE] Commit hdfs-1024 to 0.20 branch

Thanks to all who participated in the vote.

I'll commit in a minute.

St.Ack


On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Please on committing HDFS-1024 to the hadoop 0.20 branch.
>
> Background:
>
> HDFS-1024 fixes possible trashing of fsimage because of failed copy
> from 2NN and NN.  Ordinarily, possible corruption of this proportion
> would merit commit w/o need of a vote only Dhruba correctly notes that
> UNLESS both NN and 2NN are upgraded, HDFS-1024 becomes an incompatible
> change (the NN<->2NN communication will fail always).  IMO, this
> incompatible change can be plastered over with a release note; e.g.
> WARNING, you MUST update NN and 2NN when you go to 0.20.3 hadoop.  If
> you agree with me, please vote +1 on commit.
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>