You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@aurora.apache.org by Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org> on 2014/12/02 23:03:24 UTC

Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.


Bugs: AURORA-121
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-121


Repository: aurora


Description
-------

Add a caching ClusterState implementation.


Diffs
-----

  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java PRE-CREATION 
  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/ClusterState.java 3524dc595e7b61a531912843f90b01a87bc57cc4 
  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptorModule.java 489c0bfa22aae14fbd3fd2ee9e5bd32b7c3aafa5 
  src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterStateTest.java PRE-CREATION 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Bill Farner


Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation.

Posted by Zameer Manji <zm...@twopensource.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/#review63635
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Zameer Manji


On Dec. 2, 2014, 5:39 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 2, 2014, 5:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-121
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-121
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add a caching ClusterState implementation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/ClusterState.java 3524dc595e7b61a531912843f90b01a87bc57cc4 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptorModule.java 489c0bfa22aae14fbd3fd2ee9e5bd32b7c3aafa5 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterStateTest.java PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>


Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation.

Posted by Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org>.

> On Dec. 3, 2014, 2:06 a.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java, line 56
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/2/?file=780608#file780608line56>
> >
> >     This can be further simplified (unless you are concerned about the heap churn):
> >     ```java
> >     victims.remove(slaveId, PreemptionVictim.fromTask(stateChange.getTask().getAssignedTask());
> >     ```

Good suggestion, this also removed some surrounding code.


- Bill


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/#review63637
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 3, 2014, 1:39 a.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 3, 2014, 1:39 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-121
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-121
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add a caching ClusterState implementation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/ClusterState.java 3524dc595e7b61a531912843f90b01a87bc57cc4 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptorModule.java 489c0bfa22aae14fbd3fd2ee9e5bd32b7c3aafa5 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterStateTest.java PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>


Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation.

Posted by Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/#review63637
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/#comment105910>

    This can be further simplified (unless you are concerned about the heap churn):
    ```java
    victims.remove(slaveId, PreemptionVictim.fromTask(stateChange.getTask().getAssignedTask());
    ```


- Maxim Khutornenko


On Dec. 3, 2014, 1:39 a.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 3, 2014, 1:39 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-121
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-121
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add a caching ClusterState implementation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/ClusterState.java 3524dc595e7b61a531912843f90b01a87bc57cc4 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptorModule.java 489c0bfa22aae14fbd3fd2ee9e5bd32b7c3aafa5 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterStateTest.java PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>


Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation.

Posted by Aurora ReviewBot <wf...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/#review63700
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Master (8959b49) is green with this patch.
  ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh

I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing "@ReviewBot retry"

- Aurora ReviewBot


On Dec. 3, 2014, 6:23 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 3, 2014, 6:23 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-121
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-121
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add a caching ClusterState implementation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/ClusterState.java 3524dc595e7b61a531912843f90b01a87bc57cc4 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptorModule.java 489c0bfa22aae14fbd3fd2ee9e5bd32b7c3aafa5 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterStateTest.java PRE-CREATION 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptionVictimTest.java PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>


Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation.

Posted by Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Dec. 3, 2014, 6:23 p.m.)


Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.


Bugs: AURORA-121
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-121


Repository: aurora


Description
-------

Add a caching ClusterState implementation.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java PRE-CREATION 
  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/ClusterState.java 3524dc595e7b61a531912843f90b01a87bc57cc4 
  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptorModule.java 489c0bfa22aae14fbd3fd2ee9e5bd32b7c3aafa5 
  src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterStateTest.java PRE-CREATION 
  src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptionVictimTest.java PRE-CREATION 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Bill Farner


Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation.

Posted by Aurora ReviewBot <wf...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/#review63632
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Master (552ae93) is green with this patch.
  ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh

I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing "@ReviewBot retry"

- Aurora ReviewBot


On Dec. 3, 2014, 1:39 a.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 3, 2014, 1:39 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-121
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-121
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add a caching ClusterState implementation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/ClusterState.java 3524dc595e7b61a531912843f90b01a87bc57cc4 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptorModule.java 489c0bfa22aae14fbd3fd2ee9e5bd32b7c3aafa5 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterStateTest.java PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>


Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation.

Posted by Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Dec. 3, 2014, 1:39 a.m.)


Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.


Bugs: AURORA-121
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-121


Repository: aurora


Description
-------

Add a caching ClusterState implementation.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java PRE-CREATION 
  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/ClusterState.java 3524dc595e7b61a531912843f90b01a87bc57cc4 
  src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptorModule.java 489c0bfa22aae14fbd3fd2ee9e5bd32b7c3aafa5 
  src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterStateTest.java PRE-CREATION 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Bill Farner


Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation.

Posted by Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org>.

> On Dec. 2, 2014, 11:09 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java, line 58
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/1/?file=780416#file780416line58>
> >
> >     Would it make sense to do it conditionally, i.e.:
> >     ```java
> >     if (!Tasks.SLAVE_ASSIGNED_STATES.contains(stateChange.getNewState()) {
> >       Iterables.remove...
> >     } else {
> >       victims.put...
> >     }
> >     ```
> 
> Bill Farner wrote:
>     That would introduce duplicates, e.g. PENDING -> ASSIGNED -> RUNNING would result in 2 entries for the task.

Why not use a HashMultimap to store victims then? I don't see anything in the PreemptionVictim that would be different between task state transitions.


- Maxim


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/#review63598
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 2, 2014, 10:03 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 2, 2014, 10:03 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-121
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-121
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add a caching ClusterState implementation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/ClusterState.java 3524dc595e7b61a531912843f90b01a87bc57cc4 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptorModule.java 489c0bfa22aae14fbd3fd2ee9e5bd32b7c3aafa5 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterStateTest.java PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>


Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation.

Posted by Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org>.

> On Dec. 2, 2014, 11:09 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java, line 52
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/1/?file=780416#file780416line52>
> >
> >     minor nit: you might want to have it outside the synchronized block to further reduce lock scope.

I prefer the current approach, since there's less likelihood for a future diff that operates on the map outside the synchronized block.


> On Dec. 2, 2014, 11:09 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java, line 58
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/1/?file=780416#file780416line58>
> >
> >     Would it make sense to do it conditionally, i.e.:
> >     ```java
> >     if (!Tasks.SLAVE_ASSIGNED_STATES.contains(stateChange.getNewState()) {
> >       Iterables.remove...
> >     } else {
> >       victims.put...
> >     }
> >     ```

That would introduce duplicates, e.g. PENDING -> ASSIGNED -> RUNNING would result in 2 entries for the task.


- Bill


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/#review63598
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 2, 2014, 10:03 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 2, 2014, 10:03 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-121
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-121
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add a caching ClusterState implementation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/ClusterState.java 3524dc595e7b61a531912843f90b01a87bc57cc4 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptorModule.java 489c0bfa22aae14fbd3fd2ee9e5bd32b7c3aafa5 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterStateTest.java PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>


Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation.

Posted by Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org>.

> On Dec. 2, 2014, 11:09 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java, line 58
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/1/?file=780416#file780416line58>
> >
> >     Would it make sense to do it conditionally, i.e.:
> >     ```java
> >     if (!Tasks.SLAVE_ASSIGNED_STATES.contains(stateChange.getNewState()) {
> >       Iterables.remove...
> >     } else {
> >       victims.put...
> >     }
> >     ```
> 
> Bill Farner wrote:
>     That would introduce duplicates, e.g. PENDING -> ASSIGNED -> RUNNING would result in 2 entries for the task.
> 
> Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
>     Why not use a HashMultimap to store victims then? I don't see anything in the PreemptionVictim that would be different between task state transitions.

Sure, that works for me.  Done.


- Bill


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/#review63598
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 3, 2014, 1:39 a.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 3, 2014, 1:39 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-121
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-121
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add a caching ClusterState implementation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/ClusterState.java 3524dc595e7b61a531912843f90b01a87bc57cc4 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptorModule.java 489c0bfa22aae14fbd3fd2ee9e5bd32b7c3aafa5 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterStateTest.java PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>


Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation.

Posted by Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/#review63598
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/#comment105873>

    minor nit: you might want to have it outside the synchronized block to further reduce lock scope.



src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/#comment105877>

    Would it make sense to do it conditionally, i.e.:
    ```java
    if (!Tasks.SLAVE_ASSIGNED_STATES.contains(stateChange.getNewState()) {
      Iterables.remove...
    } else {
      victims.put...
    }
    ```


- Maxim Khutornenko


On Dec. 2, 2014, 10:03 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 2, 2014, 10:03 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-121
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-121
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add a caching ClusterState implementation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/ClusterState.java 3524dc595e7b61a531912843f90b01a87bc57cc4 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptorModule.java 489c0bfa22aae14fbd3fd2ee9e5bd32b7c3aafa5 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterStateTest.java PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>


Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation.

Posted by Aurora ReviewBot <wf...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/#review63596
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Master (c86ca6d) is green with this patch.
  ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh

I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing "@ReviewBot retry"

- Aurora ReviewBot


On Dec. 2, 2014, 10:03 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 2, 2014, 10:03 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-121
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-121
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add a caching ClusterState implementation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterState.java PRE-CREATION 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/ClusterState.java 3524dc595e7b61a531912843f90b01a87bc57cc4 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/PreemptorModule.java 489c0bfa22aae14fbd3fd2ee9e5bd32b7c3aafa5 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/preemptor/CachedClusterStateTest.java PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28607/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>