[jira] [Commented] (JENA-2076) Prune alternative, and unofficial Content-Types

["Jared Whiklo (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17352532#comment-17352532 ] 

Jared Whiklo commented on JENA-2076:
------------------------------------

Hi, just wondering why you left {{application/turtle}} in as a supported media-type when it does not seem to be registered with IANA? Would it not make more sense to leave the {{application/x-turtle}} in and remove {{application/turtle}} ?

Is there a registration in process?

> Prune alternative, and unofficial Content-Types
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-2076
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2076
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ARQ, Fuseki
>    Affects Versions: Jena 3.17.0
>            Reporter: Andy Seaborne
>            Assignee: Andy Seaborne
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Jena 4.0.0
>
>
> Jena should only ask for MIME types by proper name (client, asking with "Accept")
> Several alternative Content-Types are supported e.g. "x-*"  in responding to content negotiation (i.e. server side).
> The standards defining the correct MIME type have been around for several years now so prune the alternatives and check only standard forms are asked for.
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)