You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@shale.apache.org by William Huang <WH...@intralinks.com> on 2006/09/14 23:12:03 UTC
shale-tiger 1.0.3 with JSF 1.2 problem
I recently upgrade from JSF 1.1 to 1.2, now my @Value annotations does not
work any more, I also tried @Property, but still doesnt work. Anyone seen
this before?
Thanks,
Bill
Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of this email and any attachments. Thank you.
Re: shale-tiger 1.0.3 with JSF 1.2 problem
Posted by William Huang <WH...@intralinks.com>.
thanks, let me know if you can get shale-tiger to work with jsf 1.2 RI.
one more thing, Shale-Remoting is working fine though
Bill
"Craig
McClanahan"
<craigmcc@apache. To
org> user@shale.apache.org
Sent by: cc
craigmcc@gmail.co
m Subject
Re: shale-tiger 1.0.3 with JSF 1.2
problem
09/18/2006 07:55
AM
Please respond to
user@shale.apache
.org
On 9/18/06, numpsy beelzebub <nu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> jsf 1.2?
>
> mom
>
> shale uses the apache myfaces referenceimplementation of jsf - or?
>
> my last info ist that this is at 1.1?
>
Shale is designed to work with any implementation of JSF ... so either
MyFaces or the JSF RI *should* work.
That being said, I have only tested it with JSF 1.1. Testing against
the JSF 1.2 RI (since MyFaces does not yet have a 1.2 implementation)
is high on my list of things to try -- it is supposed to work.
Craig
> without the code of myfaces it should not work - it ist a add on
development
> from jsf.
>
> mmh but in java ee 5 jsf 1.2 ist standard...
>
>
> 2006/9/14, William Huang <WH...@intralinks.com>:
> >
> >
> > I recently upgrade from JSF 1.1 to 1.2, now my @Value annotations does
not
> > work any more, I also tried @Property, but still doesnt work. Anyone
seen
> > this before?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> >
> > Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential
and
> > may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
> the
> > sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of
> this
> > email and any attachments. Thank you.
> >
> >
>
>
Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of this email and any attachments. Thank you.
Re: shale-tiger 1.0.3 with JSF 1.2 problem
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 9/18/06, numpsy beelzebub <nu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> jsf 1.2?
>
> mom
>
> shale uses the apache myfaces referenceimplementation of jsf - or?
>
> my last info ist that this is at 1.1?
>
Shale is designed to work with any implementation of JSF ... so either
MyFaces or the JSF RI *should* work.
That being said, I have only tested it with JSF 1.1. Testing against
the JSF 1.2 RI (since MyFaces does not yet have a 1.2 implementation)
is high on my list of things to try -- it is supposed to work.
Craig
> without the code of myfaces it should not work - it ist a add on development
> from jsf.
>
> mmh but in java ee 5 jsf 1.2 ist standard...
>
>
> 2006/9/14, William Huang <WH...@intralinks.com>:
> >
> >
> > I recently upgrade from JSF 1.1 to 1.2, now my @Value annotations does not
> > work any more, I also tried @Property, but still doesnt work. Anyone seen
> > this before?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> >
> > Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential and
> > may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
> the
> > sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of
> this
> > email and any attachments. Thank you.
> >
> >
>
>
Re: shale-tiger 1.0.3 with JSF 1.2 problem
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 10/2/06, stephan opitz <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> so i have to ask a final question.
>
> if shale works with any jsf ri
>
> what is it exactly...
>
> brings it the jsf ri with it so that existing jf applications can be
> adopted.
>
> or does it need jsf libaries - but no found like myfaces @
> shale.apache.org
I'll speak to the state of the current code (there were some incorrect
dependency declarations in the Maven pom files):
* Shale works fine with the MyFaces 1.1.4 and RI 1.1_02 implementations
(except for one particular unit test that might well be a problem in the
test).
* There are current issues with JSF 1.2 (particularly in the view handler),
but other portions (like the new dialog manager currently in the sandbox
but about to be re-imported back into the trunk.
The design intent of Shale is to work on anyone's 1.1 or
1.2implementation. That being said, Shale was primarily written
before
1.2 existed, so it will need to accomodate the differences.
Shale *requires* that a JSF implementation (typically an API jar and an
implementation jar) be present -- it can either be included in your
WEB-INF/lib directory (along with all of its dependencies), or built in to
the app server's shared library directory. The latter is the way JSF
1.2will be available on all Java EE 5 servers (such as Glassfish),
because JSF
1.2 is a required part of the EE 5 platform.
Craig
Re: shale-tiger 1.0.3 with JSF 1.2 problem
Posted by stephan opitz <st...@gmail.com>.
so i have to ask a final question.
if shale works with any jsf ri
what is it exactly...
brings it the jsf ri with it so that existing jf applications can be adopted.
or does it need jsf libaries - but no found like myfaces @ shale.apache.org
2006/9/19, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>:
> On 9/18/06, William Huang <WH...@intralinks.com> wrote:
> >
> > I dont remember seeing any documentation about shale uses or required the
> > apache myfaces. Can you point me to any links about this?
>
>
>
> Shale does *not* require any particular JSF implementation ... it has been
> tested against the MyFaces and JSF RI implementations -- both version 1.1.
> In theory it should also work against any 1.2 implementation, but I have not
> yet had a chance to verify that.
>
>
> Thanks,
> > Bill
>
>
> Craig
>
>
> "numpsy
> > beelzebub"
> > <numpsy82@gmail.c To
> > om> user@shale.apache.org
> > cc
> > 09/18/2006 04:09
> > AM Subject
> > Re: shale-tiger 1.0.3 with JSF 1.2
> > problem
> > Please respond to
> > user@shale.apache
> > .org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > jsf 1.2?
> >
> > mom
> >
> > shale uses the apache myfaces referenceimplementation of jsf - or?
> >
> > my last info ist that this is at 1.1?
> >
> > without the code of myfaces it should not work - it ist a add on
> > development
> > from jsf.
> >
> > mmh but in java ee 5 jsf 1.2 ist standard...
> >
> >
> > 2006/9/14, William Huang <WH...@intralinks.com>:
> > >
> > >
> > > I recently upgrade from JSF 1.1 to 1.2, now my @Value annotations does
> > not
> > > work any more, I also tried @Property, but still doesnt work. Anyone
> > seen
> > > this before?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bill
> > >
> > > Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential
> > and
> > > may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
> > the
> > > sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of
> > this
> > > email and any attachments. Thank you.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential and
> > may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
> > sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of this
> > email and any attachments. Thank you.
> >
> >
>
>
Re: shale-tiger 1.0.3 with JSF 1.2 problem
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 9/18/06, William Huang <WH...@intralinks.com> wrote:
>
> I dont remember seeing any documentation about shale uses or required the
> apache myfaces. Can you point me to any links about this?
Shale does *not* require any particular JSF implementation ... it has been
tested against the MyFaces and JSF RI implementations -- both version 1.1.
In theory it should also work against any 1.2 implementation, but I have not
yet had a chance to verify that.
Thanks,
> Bill
Craig
"numpsy
> beelzebub"
> <numpsy82@gmail.c To
> om> user@shale.apache.org
> cc
> 09/18/2006 04:09
> AM Subject
> Re: shale-tiger 1.0.3 with JSF 1.2
> problem
> Please respond to
> user@shale.apache
> .org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> jsf 1.2?
>
> mom
>
> shale uses the apache myfaces referenceimplementation of jsf - or?
>
> my last info ist that this is at 1.1?
>
> without the code of myfaces it should not work - it ist a add on
> development
> from jsf.
>
> mmh but in java ee 5 jsf 1.2 ist standard...
>
>
> 2006/9/14, William Huang <WH...@intralinks.com>:
> >
> >
> > I recently upgrade from JSF 1.1 to 1.2, now my @Value annotations does
> not
> > work any more, I also tried @Property, but still doesnt work. Anyone
> seen
> > this before?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> >
> > Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential
> and
> > may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
> the
> > sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of
> this
> > email and any attachments. Thank you.
> >
> >
>
> Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential and
> may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
> sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of this
> email and any attachments. Thank you.
>
>
Re: shale-tiger 1.0.3 with JSF 1.2 problem
Posted by William Huang <WH...@intralinks.com>.
I dont remember seeing any documentation about shale uses or required the
apache myfaces. Can you point me to any links about this?
Thanks,
Bill
"numpsy
beelzebub"
<numpsy82@gmail.c To
om> user@shale.apache.org
cc
09/18/2006 04:09
AM Subject
Re: shale-tiger 1.0.3 with JSF 1.2
problem
Please respond to
user@shale.apache
.org
jsf 1.2?
mom
shale uses the apache myfaces referenceimplementation of jsf - or?
my last info ist that this is at 1.1?
without the code of myfaces it should not work - it ist a add on
development
from jsf.
mmh but in java ee 5 jsf 1.2 ist standard...
2006/9/14, William Huang <WH...@intralinks.com>:
>
>
> I recently upgrade from JSF 1.1 to 1.2, now my @Value annotations does
not
> work any more, I also tried @Property, but still doesnt work. Anyone
seen
> this before?
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
> Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential and
> may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
the
> sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of
this
> email and any attachments. Thank you.
>
>
Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of this email and any attachments. Thank you.
Re: shale-tiger 1.0.3 with JSF 1.2 problem
Posted by numpsy beelzebub <nu...@gmail.com>.
jsf 1.2?
mom
shale uses the apache myfaces referenceimplementation of jsf - or?
my last info ist that this is at 1.1?
without the code of myfaces it should not work - it ist a add on development
from jsf.
mmh but in java ee 5 jsf 1.2 ist standard...
2006/9/14, William Huang <WH...@intralinks.com>:
>
>
> I recently upgrade from JSF 1.1 to 1.2, now my @Value annotations does not
> work any more, I also tried @Property, but still doesnt work. Anyone seen
> this before?
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
> Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential and
> may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
> sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of this
> email and any attachments. Thank you.
>
>