Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02

[tan zhongyi <zh...@gmail.com>]

After a quick discussion with james,
This vote is canceled.

We will work to fix these issues one by one.

BTW:  Justin,  add a progress disclaimer and make a release, 
      Does it still need go through two stage of vote process?
      If So,  is it an apache release but with some known issue?

Thanks again for your review. 


在 2020/1/3 上午11:15，“tan zhongyi”<zh...@gmail.com> 写入:

    Thanks, Justin,
    We will check it carefully.
    
    
    On 2020/01/03 01:04:56, Justin Mclean <j....@classsoftware.com>> wrote:
    > Hi,>
    >
    > Some of us are not guys :-)>
    >
    > I’m -1 (binding) for three reasons:>
    > - the artefact names must include "incubating “ but this can be easily fixed and the voting doesn’t need to restarted (if this was the only issue)>
    > - but it also contains category B code [2] under the CDDL license.>
    > - and it also contains category X code [9] under the GPL license.>
    >
    > you may want to consider using the work in progress disclaimer while you sort these issues out. [11]>
    >
    > I checked:>
    > - incubating not in name>
    > - DISCLAIMER exists>
    > - LICENSE is missing appendix>
    > - NOTICE year needs to be updated>
    > - Source release contains category B code which is not allowed [2]>
    > - Source release contains Category X software which is not allowed. [9]>
    > - All ASF source files have ASF headers>
    > - No unexpected binary files>
    >
    > I did a spot check on licenses in LICENSE and it look like it missing a few things:>
    > - SVGPan library 1.2 Copyright 2009-2010 Andrea Leofredd contain within [3]>
    > - This file written by Colin Plumb >
    > - Supporting functions within this file by Dean Edwards of unknown license.>
    > - Code Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Alexander Chemeris in these files [6][7]>
    > - MPEG2 transport stream  Copyright (c) 2003 Fabrice Bellard in his file. [8] This is category X and can’t be included in a source release.>
    > - This file [10] is list as copyright Tencent when it actually Copyright (c) 2013, The TOFT Authors.>
    >
    > Thanks,>
    > Justin>
    >
    > 1. src/brpc/builtin/flamegraph_perl.cpp>
    > 2. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#weak-copyleft-licenses>
    > 3. ./src/brpc/builtin/pprof_perl.cpp>
    > 4. ./src/butil/md5.cc>
    > 5. ./src/brpc/builtin/sorttable_js.cpp>
    > 6. ./src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/msinttypes/inttypes.h>
    > 7. ./src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/msinttypes/stdint.h>
    > 8../src/brpc/ts.cpp>
    > 9. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x>
    > 10. src/butil/memory/scoped_array.h>
    > 11. https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#disclaimers>
    > --------------------------------------------------------------------->
    > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org<ma...@incubator.apache.org>>
    > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org<ma...@incubator.apache.org>>
    >
    >
    

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02

[Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>]

Hi,

> BTW:  Justin,  add a progress disclaimer and make a release, 
>      Does it still need go through two stage of vote process?

Yes it does. Note you also need to compile with the bundled software licensing conditions, that would include providing a copy of the GPL license in this case.

>      If So,  is it an apache release but with some known issue?

Yes see [1][2][3]

Thanks,
Justin

1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-469
2. https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers
3 https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#disclaimers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org