You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> on 2006/09/26 07:58:45 UTC
[VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Hello comrades,
The Apache Directory project team has decided that the design of MINA API
and its implementation are stablized enough to call it the next stable
release, 1.0. Here's the list of the changes since the last unstable
release, 0.9.5:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10670&fixfor=11070
Notable changes:
* Basic JMX integration - We will keep improving the JMX integration in the
next unstable branch, 1.1.
* More examples
* Leader-followers thread pool has been replaced with
backport-util-concurrent Executors.
* IoServiceListener interface
Please note that we are not going to announce the release of 1.0 until our
web site is moved to CWiki (confluence). We are just going to release the
artifact only for now, because ApacheDS 1.0 wants the first stable release
of MINA.
[ ]: +1 Release
[ ]: 0 Abstain
[ ]: -1 Don't release
Cheers,
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP key fingerprints:
* E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
* B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com>.
I forgot to vote. :)
On 9/26/06, Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [X]: +1 Release
>
Cheers,
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP key fingerprints:
* E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
* B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Mark <el...@gmail.com>.
+1 Release
On 9/26/06, jconlon@mwt.net <jc...@mwt.net> wrote:
> Great job on attaining this milestone!
>
> +1 Release
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by jc...@mwt.net.
Great job on attaining this milestone!
+1 Release
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
[X]: +1 Release
And bravo !
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Vinod Panicker <vi...@gmail.com>.
On 9/26/06, Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello comrades,
>
> The Apache Directory project team has decided that the design of MINA API
> and its implementation are stablized enough to call it the next stable
> release, 1.0. Here's the list of the changes since the last unstable
> release, 0.9.5:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10670&fixfor=11070
>
> Notable changes:
>
> * Basic JMX integration - We will keep improving the JMX integration in the
> next unstable branch, 1.1.
> * More examples
> * Leader-followers thread pool has been replaced with
> backport-util-concurrent Executors.
> * IoServiceListener interface
>
> Please note that we are not going to announce the release of 1.0 until our
> web site is moved to CWiki (confluence). We are just going to release the
> artifact only for now, because ApacheDS 1.0 wants the first stable release
> of MINA.
>
> [ ]: +1 Release
> [ ]: 0 Abstain
> [ ]: -1 Don't release
+1, but would like DIRMINA-249 to go along with 1.0, since it's an API change.
Regards,
Vinod.
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Ersin Er <er...@gmail.com>.
My +1s are being forgotten :-) (Was same for ApacheDS)
On 10/2/06, Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The vote has been closed, and here's the result:
>
> Binding +1s:
> * Emmanuel Lecharney
> * Alex Karasulu
> * Enrique Rodriguez
> * Trustin Lee
>
> Non-binding +1s:
> * Julien Vermillard
> * Frederic Breigier
> * Niklas Therning
> * Vinod Panicker
> * Dave Irving
> * Maarten Bosteels
> * jconlon
> * Mark
> * Fernando C. de Castro
> * Peter Royal
> * Kok Hoor
>
> I will release MINA 1.0 very soon.
>
> Cheers,
> Trustin
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
> --
> PGP key fingerprints:
> * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
> * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
>
>
--
Ersin
[RESULT][VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com>.
The vote has been closed, and here's the result:
Binding +1s:
* Emmanuel Lecharney
* Alex Karasulu
* Enrique Rodriguez
* Trustin Lee
Non-binding +1s:
* Julien Vermillard
* Frederic Breigier
* Niklas Therning
* Vinod Panicker
* Dave Irving
* Maarten Bosteels
* jconlon
* Mark
* Fernando C. de Castro
* Peter Royal
* Kok Hoor
I will release MINA 1.0 very soon.
Cheers,
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP key fingerprints:
* E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
* B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Ersin Er <er...@gmail.com>.
[X]: +1 Release !
On 9/26/06, Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello comrades,
>
> The Apache Directory project team has decided that the design of MINA API
> and its implementation are stablized enough to call it the next stable
> release, 1.0. Here's the list of the changes since the last unstable
> release, 0.9.5:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10670&fixfor=11070
>
> Notable changes:
>
> * Basic JMX integration - We will keep improving the JMX integration in the
> next unstable branch, 1.1.
> * More examples
> * Leader-followers thread pool has been replaced with
> backport-util-concurrent Executors.
> * IoServiceListener interface
>
> Please note that we are not going to announce the release of 1.0 until our
> web site is moved to CWiki (confluence). We are just going to release the
> artifact only for now, because ApacheDS 1.0 wants the first stable release
> of MINA.
>
> [ ]: +1 Release
> [ ]: 0 Abstain
> [ ]: -1 Don't release
>
> Cheers,
> Trustin
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
> --
> PGP key fingerprints:
> * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
> * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
>
>
--
Ersin
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Enrique Rodriguez <en...@gmail.com>.
Trustin Lee wrote:
...
[ X ]: +1 Release
[ ]: 0 Abstain
[ ]: -1 Don't release
Enrique
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Frédéric Brégier <fr...@free.fr>.
> Please note that we are not going to announce the release of 1.0 until our
> web site is moved to CWiki (confluence). We are just going to release the
> artifact only for now, because ApacheDS 1.0 wants the first stable release
> of MINA.
>
> [ ]: +1 Release
> [ ]: 0 Abstain
> [ ]: -1 Don't release
>
> Cheers,
> Trustin
+1 too, and like Julien, I think some doc should be completed, at least for
some points like how to managed ThreadPool in MINA since it is a
frequent question (when performance could be a question).
(frequent question at least for me, I agree ;-))
Frederic
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
Le mardi 26 septembre 2006 à 14:58 +0900, Trustin Lee a écrit :
...
> Please note that we are not going to announce the release of 1.0 until our
> web site is moved to CWiki (confluence). We are just going to release the
> artifact only for now, because ApacheDS 1.0 wants the first stable release
> of MINA.
>
> [ ]: +1 Release
> [ ]: 0 Abstain
> [ ]: -1 Don't release
>
> Cheers,
> Trustin
+1, I think we need to focus on website and doc for now and make the
announcement when we are ready.
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by peter royal <pr...@apache.org>.
On Sep 25, 2006, at 10:58 PM, Trustin Lee wrote:
> [X]: +1 Release
> [ ]: 0 Abstain
> [ ]: -1 Don't release
--
proyal@apache.org - http://fotap.org/~osi
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by "Fernando C. de Castro" <fe...@altriz.com.br>.
> [x]: +1 Release
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by peter royal <pe...@pobox.com>.
On Sep 28, 2006, at 3:27 AM, Kok Hoor ((Gmail)) wrote:
> everything looks good to me. Just one question, as the
> PoolThreadedModel is
> replaced by the ExecutorThreadModel, does this means that I do not
> have to
> do anything to take advantage of the ExecutorThreadModel, and it is
> created
> by default for me?
Correct.
> And is this similar or different with the
> java5-concurrency thing?
The java5 bits allow you to use the Executor that ships with java5 vs
the backported one. In actuality, we could detect the presence of
java5 via reflection and then instantiate its executor
transparently.. Would be a good enhancement for 1.0.1 :)
-pete
> To be honest MINA is pretty good, but the lack of complete
> documentation
> means performance tuning stuff like this are quite difficult to be
> used and
> understood.
>
> However, great work guys!! MINA is the best.
Patches are welcome! Especially on documentation! There is quite a
bit of knowledge in the mailing list as well, if you dig back through
the archives.
-pete
--
(peter.royal|osi)@pobox.com - http://fotap.org/~osi
RE: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by "Kok Hoor (Gmail)" <ko...@gmail.com>.
[X]: +1 Release
[ ]: 0 Abstain
[ ]: -1 Don't release
I'll vote for the release of MINA 1.0, as I have been trying it and
everything looks good to me. Just one question, as the PoolThreadedModel is
replaced by the ExecutorThreadModel, does this means that I do not have to
do anything to take advantage of the ExecutorThreadModel, and it is created
by default for me? And is this similar or different with the
java5-concurrency thing?
To be honest MINA is pretty good, but the lack of complete documentation
means performance tuning stuff like this are quite difficult to be used and
understood.
However, great work guys!! MINA is the best.
Regards,
Kok Hoor
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ao...@bellsouth.net>.
Julien Vermillard wrote:
> Le mardi 26 septembre 2006 à 07:24 -0400, Alex Karasulu a écrit :
>> Trustin Lee wrote:
>>> Hello comrades,
>>>
>>> The Apache Directory project team has decided that the design of MINA API
>>> and its implementation are stablized enough to call it the next stable
>>> release, 1.0.
>> ...
>>
>>> [X]: +1 Release
>>> [ ]: 0 Abstain
>>> [ ]: -1 Don't release
>> +1
>>
>> Well done guys!
>>
>> Alex
>
> Hey Alex we seen you voted twice, cheater ;)
Hehe. Yeah my bad. I hit send before checking off the box.
Alex
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
Le mardi 26 septembre 2006 à 07:24 -0400, Alex Karasulu a écrit :
> Trustin Lee wrote:
> > Hello comrades,
> >
> > The Apache Directory project team has decided that the design of MINA API
> > and its implementation are stablized enough to call it the next stable
> > release, 1.0.
>
> ...
>
> > [X]: +1 Release
> > [ ]: 0 Abstain
> > [ ]: -1 Don't release
>
> +1
>
> Well done guys!
>
> Alex
Hey Alex we seen you voted twice, cheater ;)
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ao...@bellsouth.net>.
Trustin Lee wrote:
> Hello comrades,
>
> The Apache Directory project team has decided that the design of MINA API
> and its implementation are stablized enough to call it the next stable
> release, 1.0.
...
> [X]: +1 Release
> [ ]: 0 Abstain
> [ ]: -1 Don't release
+1
Well done guys!
Alex
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Niklas Therning <ni...@trillian.se>.
[X]: +1 Release
Well done everybody!
/Niklas
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ao...@bellsouth.net>.
Trustin Lee wrote:
> Hello comrades,
>
> The Apache Directory project team has decided that the design of MINA API
> and its implementation are stablized enough to call it the next stable
> release, 1.0. Here's the list of the changes since the last unstable
> release, 0.9.5:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10670&fixfor=11070
>
>
> Notable changes:
>
> * Basic JMX integration - We will keep improving the JMX integration in the
> next unstable branch, 1.1.
> * More examples
> * Leader-followers thread pool has been replaced with
> backport-util-concurrent Executors.
> * IoServiceListener interface
>
> Please note that we are not going to announce the release of 1.0 until our
> web site is moved to CWiki (confluence). We are just going to release the
> artifact only for now, because ApacheDS 1.0 wants the first stable release
> of MINA.
>
> [ ]: +1 Release
> [ ]: 0 Abstain
> [ ]: -1 Don't release
+1
Well done guys!
Alex
Re: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by Maarten Bosteels <ma...@dns.be>.
+1
congratulations to everyone !
On 9/26/06, Irving, Dave <da...@logicacmg.com> wrote:
> Trustin Lee wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >
> > [ ]: +1 Release
> > [ ]: 0 Abstain
> > [ ]: -1 Don't release
>
> +1 - release.
> This is great news... Its also time to get asyncWeb updated to employ
> mina 1.0 :o)
>
> > Cheers,
> > Trustin
>
> Dave
>
>
> This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
>
RE: [VOTE] Releasing MINA 1.0 (finally!)
Posted by "Irving, Dave" <da...@logicacmg.com>.
Trustin Lee wrote:
...
>
> [ ]: +1 Release
> [ ]: 0 Abstain
> [ ]: -1 Don't release
+1 - release.
This is great news... Its also time to get asyncWeb updated to employ
mina 1.0 :o)
> Cheers,
> Trustin
Dave
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.