You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@s-und-n.de> on 2003/01/31 12:39:10 UTC
Sitemap-Engine for 2.0.5
Is anyone against making the treeprocessor the default engine for 2.0.5?
Is anyone against removing the stylesheet engine? I don't think that we
have to keep it for compatibility issues.
Carsten
Carsten Ziegeler
Open Source Group, S&N AG
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
RE: Sitemap-Engine for 2.0.5
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@s-und-n.de>.
Christian Haul wrote:
>
> There is an open issue with regard to nested actions in action-sets:
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9835
>
> Since Vadim considered it as blocking for 2.1, it sure is blocking us
> from changing the default processor let alone remove it.
>
Very good point, so we should fix it before release.
Thanks
Carsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Sitemap-Engine for 2.0.5
Posted by Christian Haul <ha...@dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>.
On 31.Jan.2003 -- 12:39 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Is anyone against making the treeprocessor the default engine for 2.0.5?
>
> Is anyone against removing the stylesheet engine? I don't think that we
> have to keep it for compatibility issues.
There is an open issue with regard to nested actions in action-sets:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9835
Since Vadim considered it as blocking for 2.1, it sure is blocking us
from changing the default processor let alone remove it.
Chris.
--
C h r i s t i a n H a u l
haul@informatik.tu-darmstadt.de
fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837 7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Sitemap-Engine for 2.0.5
Posted by Vadim Gritsenko <va...@verizon.net>.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>Is anyone against making the treeprocessor the default engine for 2.0.5?
>
>
+1 for changing default.
>Is anyone against removing the stylesheet engine? I don't think that we
>have to keep it for compatibility issues.
>
-1 for immediate removal, +1 for grace period.
Vadim
>Carsten
>
>Carsten Ziegeler
>Open Source Group, S&N AG
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Sitemap-Engine for 2.0.5
Posted by Konstantin Piroumian <kp...@apache.org>.
From: "Carsten Ziegeler" <cz...@s-und-n.de>
> Is anyone against making the treeprocessor the default engine for 2.0.5?
+1
>
> Is anyone against removing the stylesheet engine? I don't think that we
> have to keep it for compatibility issues.
Why should remove something from a branch which is concidered to be in a
bug-fixing state?
Can't we just leave it there?
And it'd be better to ask in Cocoon Users list, there can be a lot of people
using the old sitemap processor in production.
-- Konstantin
>
> Carsten
>
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Open Source Group, S&N AG
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Sitemap-Engine for 2.0.5
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agsoftware.dnsalias.com>.
Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
> Is anyone against making the treeprocessor the default engine for 2.0.5?
I am in favor of making the treeprocessor the default engine for 2.0.5.
> Is anyone against removing the stylesheet engine? I don't think that we
> have to keep it for compatibility issues.
Is there a diference? I thinked the use of that is transparently for the
user view. If this is true. I think you can remove it. What kind of
compatibiliy issue can raise the change?
Maybe there is only a sentimental issue from the author of the piece of
code. ;-)
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Sitemap-Engine for 2.0.5
Posted by Torsten Curdt <tc...@dff.st>.
Leo Sutic wrote:
>
>>From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@s-und-n.de]
>>
>>Is anyone against making the treeprocessor the default engine
>>for 2.0.5?
>>
>>Is anyone against removing the stylesheet engine? I don't
>>think that we have to keep it for compatibility issues.
+1 for the treeprocessor as default for 2.0.5
But maybe we should keep the compiled one some longer and log a big
warning that it is going to be removed? Something like a grace period?
--
Torsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
RE: Sitemap-Engine for 2.0.5
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@s-und-n.de>.
Leo Sutic wrote:
>
>
> > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@s-und-n.de]
> >
> > Is anyone against making the treeprocessor the default engine
> > for 2.0.5?
> >
> > Is anyone against removing the stylesheet engine? I don't
> > think that we have to keep it for compatibility issues.
>
> By "the stylesheet engine" are you referring to the compiled sitemap
> engine? (Not the XSLT processor.)
>
Yes, exactly - ok, my words are a little bit misunderstandable. Yes,
I mean the compiling sitemap engine consisting mainly of a stylesheet.
This affects of course not the compilation engine for XSP.
Carsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
RE: Sitemap-Engine for 2.0.5
Posted by Leo Sutic <le...@inspireinfrastructure.com>.
> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@s-und-n.de]
>
> Is anyone against making the treeprocessor the default engine
> for 2.0.5?
>
> Is anyone against removing the stylesheet engine? I don't
> think that we have to keep it for compatibility issues.
By "the stylesheet engine" are you referring to the compiled sitemap
engine? (Not the XSLT processor.)
/LS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org