You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@hudi.apache.org by "Rahil Chertara (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/05/24 22:27:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (HUDI-6262) Hudi-Spark Support Complex Data Types for Parquet Vectorized Reader

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Rahil Chertara updated HUDI-6262:
---------------------------------
    Description: 
Recently when trying to upgrade to Spark 3.4.0 [https://github.com/apache/hudi/actions/runs/4985991589/jobs/8926379795?pr=8682] and running test
{code:java}
org.apache.hudi.TestAvroSchemaResolutionSupport#testArrayOfMapsChangeValueType{code}
saw the following exception 

 
{code:java}
java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeRow cannot be cast to org.apache.spark.sql.vectorized.ColumnarBatch
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0110639Z at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FileSourceScanExec$$anon$1.next(DataSourceScanExec.scala:600)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0110882Z at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FileSourceScanExec$$anon$1.next(DataSourceScanExec.scala:589)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0111237Z at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1.columnartorow_nextBatch_0$(Unknown Source)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0111621Z at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1.processNext(Unknown Source)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0111933Z at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0112206Z at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:760)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0112432Z at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.$anonfun$getByteArrayRdd$1(SparkPlan.scala:388)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0112618Z at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$2(RDD.scala:888)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0112814Z at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$2$adapted(RDD.scala:888)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0113021Z at org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:52)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0113220Z at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:364)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0113374Z at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:328)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0113580Z at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:92){code}
 

Currenlty in our {{Spark32PlusHoodieParquetFileFormat we do this}}
{code:java}
val enableVectorizedReader: Boolean =
sqlConf.parquetVectorizedReaderEnabled &&
resultSchema.forall(_.dataType.isInstanceOf[AtomicType]){code}

the issue i think was that our enableVectorizedReader check was only checking for atomic type but the {{supportBatch}} was taking directly from spark parquet file format suportBatch, which is not the same check for only atomic type as spark supports now multiple types for vectorized reader [https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33695/files#diff-1ce36caa3af5c079a8a0190c624ac4c9e95dcb91d42fc433b820023f73ed68ed] since spark 3.3.0

 

We also cant directly do the same logic as spark ParquetFileFormat  of calling
ParquetUtils.isBatchReadSupportedForSchema(conf, schema)
since i think in hudi inside we only support a limited types for spark
{code:java}
SparkInternalSchemaConverter#convertColumnVectorType{code}

i think we would need to port this spark pr logic inside hudi for a real long term support for vectorized reader. 

 

  was:
Recently when trying to upgrade to Spark 3.4.0 https://github.com/apache/hudi/actions/runs/4985991589/jobs/8926379795?pr=8682 and running test
{code:java}
org.apache.hudi.TestAvroSchemaResolutionSupport#testArrayOfMapsChangeValueType{code}
saw the following exception 

```
java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeRow cannot be cast to org.apache.spark.sql.vectorized.ColumnarBatch
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0110639Z  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FileSourceScanExec$$anon$1.next(DataSourceScanExec.scala:600)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0110882Z  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FileSourceScanExec$$anon$1.next(DataSourceScanExec.scala:589)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0111237Z  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1.columnartorow_nextBatch_0$(Unknown Source)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0111621Z  at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1.processNext(Unknown Source)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0111933Z  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0112206Z  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:760)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0112432Z  at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.$anonfun$getByteArrayRdd$1(SparkPlan.scala:388)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0112618Z  at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$2(RDD.scala:888)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0112814Z  at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$2$adapted(RDD.scala:888)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0113021Z  at org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:52)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0113220Z  at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:364)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0113374Z  at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:328)
2023-05-16T01:46:35.0113580Z  at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:92)
```

Currenlty in our {{Spark32PlusHoodieParquetFileFormat we do this}}
    val enableVectorizedReader: Boolean =
      sqlConf.parquetVectorizedReaderEnabled &&
        resultSchema.forall(_.dataType.isInstanceOf[AtomicType])
the issue i think was that our enableVectorizedReader check was only checking for atomic type but the {{supportBatch}} was taking directly from spark parquet file format suportBatch, which is not the same check for only atomic type as spark supports now multiple types for vectorized reader [https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33695/files#diff-1ce36caa3af5c079a8a0190c624ac4c9e95dcb91d42fc433b820023f73ed68ed]We also cant directly do the same logic as spark ParquetFileFormat  of calling
ParquetUtils.isBatchReadSupportedForSchema(conf, schema)
since i think in hudi inside we only support a limited types for spark
SparkInternalSchemaConverter
i think we would need to port this spark pr logic inside hudi for a real long term support for vectorized reader. 


> Hudi-Spark Support Complex Data Types for Parquet Vectorized Reader 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HUDI-6262
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6262
>             Project: Apache Hudi
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Rahil Chertara
>            Priority: Major
>
> Recently when trying to upgrade to Spark 3.4.0 [https://github.com/apache/hudi/actions/runs/4985991589/jobs/8926379795?pr=8682] and running test
> {code:java}
> org.apache.hudi.TestAvroSchemaResolutionSupport#testArrayOfMapsChangeValueType{code}
> saw the following exception 
>  
> {code:java}
> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeRow cannot be cast to org.apache.spark.sql.vectorized.ColumnarBatch
> 2023-05-16T01:46:35.0110639Z at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FileSourceScanExec$$anon$1.next(DataSourceScanExec.scala:600)
> 2023-05-16T01:46:35.0110882Z at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.FileSourceScanExec$$anon$1.next(DataSourceScanExec.scala:589)
> 2023-05-16T01:46:35.0111237Z at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1.columnartorow_nextBatch_0$(Unknown Source)
> 2023-05-16T01:46:35.0111621Z at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1.processNext(Unknown Source)
> 2023-05-16T01:46:35.0111933Z at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
> 2023-05-16T01:46:35.0112206Z at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:760)
> 2023-05-16T01:46:35.0112432Z at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.$anonfun$getByteArrayRdd$1(SparkPlan.scala:388)
> 2023-05-16T01:46:35.0112618Z at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$2(RDD.scala:888)
> 2023-05-16T01:46:35.0112814Z at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$2$adapted(RDD.scala:888)
> 2023-05-16T01:46:35.0113021Z at org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:52)
> 2023-05-16T01:46:35.0113220Z at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:364)
> 2023-05-16T01:46:35.0113374Z at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:328)
> 2023-05-16T01:46:35.0113580Z at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:92){code}
>  
> Currenlty in our {{Spark32PlusHoodieParquetFileFormat we do this}}
> {code:java}
> val enableVectorizedReader: Boolean =
> sqlConf.parquetVectorizedReaderEnabled &&
> resultSchema.forall(_.dataType.isInstanceOf[AtomicType]){code}
> the issue i think was that our enableVectorizedReader check was only checking for atomic type but the {{supportBatch}} was taking directly from spark parquet file format suportBatch, which is not the same check for only atomic type as spark supports now multiple types for vectorized reader [https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33695/files#diff-1ce36caa3af5c079a8a0190c624ac4c9e95dcb91d42fc433b820023f73ed68ed] since spark 3.3.0
>  
> We also cant directly do the same logic as spark ParquetFileFormat  of calling
> ParquetUtils.isBatchReadSupportedForSchema(conf, schema)
> since i think in hudi inside we only support a limited types for spark
> {code:java}
> SparkInternalSchemaConverter#convertColumnVectorType{code}
> i think we would need to port this spark pr logic inside hudi for a real long term support for vectorized reader. 
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)