You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> on 2008/04/17 17:12:26 UTC
[s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test
build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all
feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/
We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing
code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging
issues.
Don
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available (test result)
Posted by Jeromy Evans <je...@blueskyminds.com.au>.
I spent several hours migrating applications to Struts2.1.1 today. I've
applied a significant overhaul to the migration guide [1].
Summary of results:
core: no new issues encountered after following the migration guide
tiles 2 plugin: no new issues encountered after following migration guide
sitemesh plugin: no new issues encountered, no migration required
jasperreports plugin: no new issues encountered, no migration required
dojo plugin: no new issues encountered after following the migration
guide (only a cursory look. *see notes below)
Third-party plugins:
json plugin: no new issues encountered, no migration required
guice plugin: no new issues encountered, no migration required
Other:
codebehind: in use, no new issues to report (but not migrated from any
2.0.x apps)
rest: in use, no new issues to report
*Dojo plugin:
I only had used a small test application for this consisting of
autocompleter, datetimepicker, divs and binds. I can confirm what has
already been reported by others: there is an issue regarding execution
of inline javascript in ajax results that may affect some users
migrating from 2.0.x to 2.1.x: Inline scripts are NOT executed unless
separateScripts="true" and executeScripts="true". I believe, but could
not confirm, that these attributes were independent in Struts2.0.x I
have updated the migration guide accordingly.
[1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/S2WIKI/Troubleshooting+guide+migrating+from+Struts+2.0.x+to+2.1.x
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Convention Plugin Status
Posted by Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com>.
It was a port of SmartURLs and I didn't get everything totally cleaned
up before getting so busy I could barely check my email ;). I'll remove
them.
-bp
Don Brown wrote:
> You can remove the author tags, but only the author can remove
> copyright headers, unfortunately.
>
> BTW, how did code get checked into our SVN with copyright headers?
>
> Don
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> FYI the convention plugin still has copyright headers in some files
>> and @Author tags, I will remove them.
>>
>> musachy
>>
>> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I will be looking at the Convention plugin for the next few days. What
>>> is broken/missing that is blocking its merge into trunk? I am going
>>> thru the documentation trying the examples myself, and everything
>>> seems to be working so far.
>>>
>>> musachy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > I think doing an mvn -pAll once fixes the parent pom problem.
>>> >
>>> > musachy
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Bob Tiernay
>>>
> <bt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> > > Hi Brian,
>>> > >
>>> > > Seeing as how I am new to both maven and svn, I'm probably
>>>
> not the best
>
>>> > > person for the job. I'm actually trying to build the project
>>>
> now from svn
>
>>> > > and I' m running into issues with the missing parent pom.
>>> > >
>>> > > Any help getting this into the next release would be greatly
>>>
> appreciated :)
>
>>> > >
>>> > > Also, does this plugin effectively make codebehind and
>>>
> smarturls obsolete?
>
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks again.
>>> > > --------------------------------------------------
>>> > > From: "Brian Pontarelli" <br...@pontarelli.com>
>>> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:20 AM
>>> > > To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
>>> > > Subject: Re: Convention Plugin Status
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > Bob Tiernay wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Anyone know what the status of the Convention plugin is? Is there
>>> > > anyways we can get it out of the sandbox and into a formal
>>>
> release? I'm
>
>>> > > willing to help out :)
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > The plugin is stable and running in production. It can
>>>
> probably be moved
>
>>> > > out of the sandbox whenever we want. At this point, I'm
>>>
> completely fine with
>
>>> > > pulling it out of the sandbox. I've been using it for a
>>>
> number of months and
>
>>> > > it is fine.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Anyone else adverse to moving it out?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Bob, if you have sometime, the move should be as simple as
>>>
> an svn mv and
>
>>> > > maybe a little build tweaking. The other thing that needs to
>>>
> be done is to
>
>>> > > figure out the documentation home and move the docs from the
>>>
> plugin wiki to
>
>>> > > that location. That is if we want to move them.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -bp
>>> > > >
>>> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Convention Plugin Status
Posted by James Holmes <ja...@jamesholmes.com>.
+1
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Another thing is that the convention plugin is using
> java.util.logging.*. I think we should stick to what we have in core
> and everywhere else.
>
> musachy
>
Re: Convention Plugin Status
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
I have been playing with the plugin since yesterday, and everything
that is documented here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/S2PLUGINS/convention-plugin.html
seems to be working fine. Is there anything you are aware of that
would prevent us from moving it out of the sandbox?
musachy
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com> wrote:
> I committed all of the copyright changes and author tags changes. It seems
> that all of the copyrights were correct, however, the IntelliJ copyright
> plugin decided to add in the old copyright in addition to the new ASF
> copyright. So, everything was still all ASL v2, but some files had dual
> assignee's. All is well now.
>
> -bp
>
>
>
>
> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
> > Done
> >
> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Agreed.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Another thing is that the convention plugin is using
> > > > java.util.logging.*. I think we should stick to what we have in core
> > > > and everywhere else.
> > > >
> > > > musachy
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Ok, I will let Brian clean that up then.
> > > > >
> > > > > musachy
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > > You can remove the author tags, but only the author can remove
> > > > > > copyright headers, unfortunately.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > BTW, how did code get checked into our SVN with copyright
> headers?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Don
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Musachy Barroso
> <mu...@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > FYI the convention plugin still has copyright headers in some
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > files
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > and @Author tags, I will remove them.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > musachy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Musachy Barroso
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > >> I will be looking at the Convention plugin for the next few
> days.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > What
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > >> is broken/missing that is blocking its merge into trunk? I
> am
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > going
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > >> thru the documentation trying the examples myself, and
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > everything
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > >> seems to be working so far.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> musachy
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Musachy Barroso
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > >> > I think doing an mvn -pAll once fixes the parent pom
> problem.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > musachy
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Bob Tiernay
> > > > > > <bt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > Hi Brian,
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > Seeing as how I am new to both maven and svn, I'm
> probably
> > > > > > not the best
> > > > > > >> > > person for the job. I'm actually trying to build the
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > project
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > now from svn
> > > > > > >> > > and I' m running into issues with the missing parent
> pom.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > Any help getting this into the next release would be
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > greatly
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > appreciated :)
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > Also, does this plugin effectively make codebehind and
> > > > > > smarturls obsolete?
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > Thanks again.
> > > > > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> > > From: "Brian Pontarelli" <br...@pontarelli.com>
> > > > > > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:20 AM
> > > > > > >> > > To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: Convention Plugin Status
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > > Bob Tiernay wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > Anyone know what the status of the Convention
> plugin
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > is? Is there
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > anyways we can get it out of the sandbox and into a
> formal
> > > > > > release? I'm
> > > > > > >> > > willing to help out :)
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > The plugin is stable and running in production. It
> can
> > > > > > probably be moved
> > > > > > >> > > out of the sandbox whenever we want. At this point, I'm
> > > > > > completely fine with
> > > > > > >> > > pulling it out of the sandbox. I've been using it for a
> > > > > > number of months and
> > > > > > >> > > it is fine.
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > Anyone else adverse to moving it out?
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > Bob, if you have sometime, the move should be as
> simple
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > as
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > an svn mv and
> > > > > > >> > > maybe a little build tweaking. The other thing that
> needs
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > to
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > be done is to
> > > > > > >> > > figure out the documentation home and move the docs
> from
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > the
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > plugin wiki to
> > > > > > >> > > that location. That is if we want to move them.
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > -bp
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > > > > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > > > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > --
> > > > > > >> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink
> Floyd
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Convention Plugin Status
Posted by Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com>.
I committed all of the copyright changes and author tags changes. It
seems that all of the copyrights were correct, however, the IntelliJ
copyright plugin decided to add in the old copyright in addition to the
new ASF copyright. So, everything was still all ASL v2, but some files
had dual assignee's. All is well now.
-bp
Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Done
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com> wrote:
>
>> Agreed.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Another thing is that the convention plugin is using
>>> java.util.logging.*. I think we should stick to what we have in core
>>> and everywhere else.
>>>
>>> musachy
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>
>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> Ok, I will let Brian clean that up then.
>>>>
>>>> musachy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>>>> > You can remove the author tags, but only the author can remove
>>>> > copyright headers, unfortunately.
>>>> >
>>>> > BTW, how did code get checked into our SVN with copyright headers?
>>>> >
>>>> > Don
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> > > FYI the convention plugin still has copyright headers in some
>>>>
>> files
>>
>>>> > > and @Author tags, I will remove them.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > musachy
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Musachy Barroso
>>>>
>> <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> > >> I will be looking at the Convention plugin for the next few days.
>>>>
>> What
>>
>>>> > >> is broken/missing that is blocking its merge into trunk? I am
>>>>
>> going
>>
>>>> > >> thru the documentation trying the examples myself, and
>>>>
>> everything
>>
>>>> > >> seems to be working so far.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> musachy
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Musachy Barroso
>>>>
>> <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> > >> > I think doing an mvn -pAll once fixes the parent pom problem.
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > musachy
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Bob Tiernay
>>>> > <bt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> > > Hi Brian,
>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > >> > > Seeing as how I am new to both maven and svn, I'm probably
>>>> > not the best
>>>> > >> > > person for the job. I'm actually trying to build the
>>>>
>> project
>>
>>>> > now from svn
>>>> > >> > > and I' m running into issues with the missing parent pom.
>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > >> > > Any help getting this into the next release would be
>>>>
>> greatly
>>
>>>> > appreciated :)
>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > >> > > Also, does this plugin effectively make codebehind and
>>>> > smarturls obsolete?
>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > >> > > Thanks again.
>>>> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------
>>>> > >> > > From: "Brian Pontarelli" <br...@pontarelli.com>
>>>> > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:20 AM
>>>> > >> > > To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
>>>> > >> > > Subject: Re: Convention Plugin Status
>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > >> > > > Bob Tiernay wrote:
>>>> > >> > > >
>>>> > >> > > > > Anyone know what the status of the Convention plugin
>>>>
>> is? Is there
>>
>>>> > >> > > anyways we can get it out of the sandbox and into a formal
>>>> > release? I'm
>>>> > >> > > willing to help out :)
>>>> > >> > > > >
>>>> > >> > > > The plugin is stable and running in production. It can
>>>> > probably be moved
>>>> > >> > > out of the sandbox whenever we want. At this point, I'm
>>>> > completely fine with
>>>> > >> > > pulling it out of the sandbox. I've been using it for a
>>>> > number of months and
>>>> > >> > > it is fine.
>>>> > >> > > >
>>>> > >> > > > Anyone else adverse to moving it out?
>>>> > >> > > >
>>>> > >> > > > Bob, if you have sometime, the move should be as simple
>>>>
>> as
>>
>>>> > an svn mv and
>>>> > >> > > maybe a little build tweaking. The other thing that needs
>>>>
>> to
>>
>>>> > be done is to
>>>> > >> > > figure out the documentation home and move the docs from
>>>>
>> the
>>
>>>> > plugin wiki to
>>>> > >> > > that location. That is if we want to move them.
>>>> > >> > > >
>>>> > >> > > > -bp
>>>> > >> > > >
>>>> > >> > > >
>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>> > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>>> > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>
>> dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>>> > >> > > >
>>>> > >> > > >
>>>> > >> > > >
>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > >> > >
>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>> > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>>> > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>
>> dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > >> > >
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > --
>>>> > >> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> --
>>>> > >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > --
>>>> > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Convention Plugin Status
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
Done
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com> wrote:
> Agreed.
>
>
>
>
> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
> > Another thing is that the convention plugin is using
> > java.util.logging.*. I think we should stick to what we have in core
> > and everywhere else.
> >
> > musachy
> >
> > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Ok, I will let Brian clean that up then.
> > >
> > > musachy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> > > > You can remove the author tags, but only the author can remove
> > > > copyright headers, unfortunately.
> > > >
> > > > BTW, how did code get checked into our SVN with copyright headers?
> > > >
> > > > Don
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > FYI the convention plugin still has copyright headers in some
> files
> > > > > and @Author tags, I will remove them.
> > > > >
> > > > > musachy
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Musachy Barroso
> <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> I will be looking at the Convention plugin for the next few days.
> What
> > > > >> is broken/missing that is blocking its merge into trunk? I am
> going
> > > > >> thru the documentation trying the examples myself, and
> everything
> > > > >> seems to be working so far.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> musachy
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Musachy Barroso
> <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > I think doing an mvn -pAll once fixes the parent pom problem.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > musachy
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Bob Tiernay
> > > > <bt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > > Hi Brian,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Seeing as how I am new to both maven and svn, I'm probably
> > > > not the best
> > > > >> > > person for the job. I'm actually trying to build the
> project
> > > > now from svn
> > > > >> > > and I' m running into issues with the missing parent pom.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Any help getting this into the next release would be
> greatly
> > > > appreciated :)
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Also, does this plugin effectively make codebehind and
> > > > smarturls obsolete?
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Thanks again.
> > > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> > > From: "Brian Pontarelli" <br...@pontarelli.com>
> > > > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:20 AM
> > > > >> > > To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > > > >> > > Subject: Re: Convention Plugin Status
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > Bob Tiernay wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Anyone know what the status of the Convention plugin
> is? Is there
> > > > >> > > anyways we can get it out of the sandbox and into a formal
> > > > release? I'm
> > > > >> > > willing to help out :)
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > The plugin is stable and running in production. It can
> > > > probably be moved
> > > > >> > > out of the sandbox whenever we want. At this point, I'm
> > > > completely fine with
> > > > >> > > pulling it out of the sandbox. I've been using it for a
> > > > number of months and
> > > > >> > > it is fine.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Anyone else adverse to moving it out?
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Bob, if you have sometime, the move should be as simple
> as
> > > > an svn mv and
> > > > >> > > maybe a little build tweaking. The other thing that needs
> to
> > > > be done is to
> > > > >> > > figure out the documentation home and move the docs from
> the
> > > > plugin wiki to
> > > > >> > > that location. That is if we want to move them.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > -bp
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > --
> > > > >> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Convention Plugin Status
Posted by Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com>.
Agreed.
Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Another thing is that the convention plugin is using
> java.util.logging.*. I think we should stick to what we have in core
> and everywhere else.
>
> musachy
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I will let Brian clean that up then.
>>
>> musachy
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>> > You can remove the author tags, but only the author can remove
>> > copyright headers, unfortunately.
>> >
>> > BTW, how did code get checked into our SVN with copyright headers?
>> >
>> > Don
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > FYI the convention plugin still has copyright headers in some files
>> > > and @Author tags, I will remove them.
>> > >
>> > > musachy
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> I will be looking at the Convention plugin for the next few days. What
>> > >> is broken/missing that is blocking its merge into trunk? I am going
>> > >> thru the documentation trying the examples myself, and everything
>> > >> seems to be working so far.
>> > >>
>> > >> musachy
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > I think doing an mvn -pAll once fixes the parent pom problem.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > musachy
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Bob Tiernay
>> > <bt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> > > Hi Brian,
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Seeing as how I am new to both maven and svn, I'm probably
>> > not the best
>> > >> > > person for the job. I'm actually trying to build the project
>> > now from svn
>> > >> > > and I' m running into issues with the missing parent pom.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Any help getting this into the next release would be greatly
>> > appreciated :)
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Also, does this plugin effectively make codebehind and
>> > smarturls obsolete?
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Thanks again.
>> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------
>> > >> > > From: "Brian Pontarelli" <br...@pontarelli.com>
>> > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:20 AM
>> > >> > > To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
>> > >> > > Subject: Re: Convention Plugin Status
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > Bob Tiernay wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > > Anyone know what the status of the Convention plugin is? Is there
>> > >> > > anyways we can get it out of the sandbox and into a formal
>> > release? I'm
>> > >> > > willing to help out :)
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > The plugin is stable and running in production. It can
>> > probably be moved
>> > >> > > out of the sandbox whenever we want. At this point, I'm
>> > completely fine with
>> > >> > > pulling it out of the sandbox. I've been using it for a
>> > number of months and
>> > >> > > it is fine.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Anyone else adverse to moving it out?
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Bob, if you have sometime, the move should be as simple as
>> > an svn mv and
>> > >> > > maybe a little build tweaking. The other thing that needs to
>> > be done is to
>> > >> > > figure out the documentation home and move the docs from the
>> > plugin wiki to
>> > >> > > that location. That is if we want to move them.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > -bp
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > --
>> > >> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Convention Plugin Status
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
Another thing is that the convention plugin is using
java.util.logging.*. I think we should stick to what we have in core
and everywhere else.
musachy
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I will let Brian clean that up then.
>
> musachy
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> > You can remove the author tags, but only the author can remove
> > copyright headers, unfortunately.
> >
> > BTW, how did code get checked into our SVN with copyright headers?
> >
> > Don
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > FYI the convention plugin still has copyright headers in some files
> > > and @Author tags, I will remove them.
> > >
> > > musachy
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> I will be looking at the Convention plugin for the next few days. What
> > >> is broken/missing that is blocking its merge into trunk? I am going
> > >> thru the documentation trying the examples myself, and everything
> > >> seems to be working so far.
> > >>
> > >> musachy
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > I think doing an mvn -pAll once fixes the parent pom problem.
> > >> >
> > >> > musachy
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Bob Tiernay
> > <bt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > Hi Brian,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Seeing as how I am new to both maven and svn, I'm probably
> > not the best
> > >> > > person for the job. I'm actually trying to build the project
> > now from svn
> > >> > > and I' m running into issues with the missing parent pom.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Any help getting this into the next release would be greatly
> > appreciated :)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Also, does this plugin effectively make codebehind and
> > smarturls obsolete?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks again.
> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > From: "Brian Pontarelli" <br...@pontarelli.com>
> > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:20 AM
> > >> > > To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > >> > > Subject: Re: Convention Plugin Status
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Bob Tiernay wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Anyone know what the status of the Convention plugin is? Is there
> > >> > > anyways we can get it out of the sandbox and into a formal
> > release? I'm
> > >> > > willing to help out :)
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > The plugin is stable and running in production. It can
> > probably be moved
> > >> > > out of the sandbox whenever we want. At this point, I'm
> > completely fine with
> > >> > > pulling it out of the sandbox. I've been using it for a
> > number of months and
> > >> > > it is fine.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Anyone else adverse to moving it out?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Bob, if you have sometime, the move should be as simple as
> > an svn mv and
> > >> > > maybe a little build tweaking. The other thing that needs to
> > be done is to
> > >> > > figure out the documentation home and move the docs from the
> > plugin wiki to
> > >> > > that location. That is if we want to move them.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > -bp
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Convention Plugin Status
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
Ok, I will let Brian clean that up then.
musachy
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> You can remove the author tags, but only the author can remove
> copyright headers, unfortunately.
>
> BTW, how did code get checked into our SVN with copyright headers?
>
> Don
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > FYI the convention plugin still has copyright headers in some files
> > and @Author tags, I will remove them.
> >
> > musachy
> >
> > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I will be looking at the Convention plugin for the next few days. What
> >> is broken/missing that is blocking its merge into trunk? I am going
> >> thru the documentation trying the examples myself, and everything
> >> seems to be working so far.
> >>
> >> musachy
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I think doing an mvn -pAll once fixes the parent pom problem.
> >> >
> >> > musachy
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Bob Tiernay
> <bt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > Hi Brian,
> >> > >
> >> > > Seeing as how I am new to both maven and svn, I'm probably
> not the best
> >> > > person for the job. I'm actually trying to build the project
> now from svn
> >> > > and I' m running into issues with the missing parent pom.
> >> > >
> >> > > Any help getting this into the next release would be greatly
> appreciated :)
> >> > >
> >> > > Also, does this plugin effectively make codebehind and
> smarturls obsolete?
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks again.
> >> > > --------------------------------------------------
> >> > > From: "Brian Pontarelli" <br...@pontarelli.com>
> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:20 AM
> >> > > To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> >> > > Subject: Re: Convention Plugin Status
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > > Bob Tiernay wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Anyone know what the status of the Convention plugin is? Is there
> >> > > anyways we can get it out of the sandbox and into a formal
> release? I'm
> >> > > willing to help out :)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > The plugin is stable and running in production. It can
> probably be moved
> >> > > out of the sandbox whenever we want. At this point, I'm
> completely fine with
> >> > > pulling it out of the sandbox. I've been using it for a
> number of months and
> >> > > it is fine.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Anyone else adverse to moving it out?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Bob, if you have sometime, the move should be as simple as
> an svn mv and
> >> > > maybe a little build tweaking. The other thing that needs to
> be done is to
> >> > > figure out the documentation home and move the docs from the
> plugin wiki to
> >> > > that location. That is if we want to move them.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > -bp
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Convention Plugin Status
Posted by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>.
You can remove the author tags, but only the author can remove
copyright headers, unfortunately.
BTW, how did code get checked into our SVN with copyright headers?
Don
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FYI the convention plugin still has copyright headers in some files
> and @Author tags, I will remove them.
>
> musachy
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I will be looking at the Convention plugin for the next few days. What
>> is broken/missing that is blocking its merge into trunk? I am going
>> thru the documentation trying the examples myself, and everything
>> seems to be working so far.
>>
>> musachy
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I think doing an mvn -pAll once fixes the parent pom problem.
>> >
>> > musachy
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Bob Tiernay
<bt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Hi Brian,
>> > >
>> > > Seeing as how I am new to both maven and svn, I'm probably
not the best
>> > > person for the job. I'm actually trying to build the project
now from svn
>> > > and I' m running into issues with the missing parent pom.
>> > >
>> > > Any help getting this into the next release would be greatly
appreciated :)
>> > >
>> > > Also, does this plugin effectively make codebehind and
smarturls obsolete?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks again.
>> > > --------------------------------------------------
>> > > From: "Brian Pontarelli" <br...@pontarelli.com>
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:20 AM
>> > > To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
>> > > Subject: Re: Convention Plugin Status
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > Bob Tiernay wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Anyone know what the status of the Convention plugin is? Is there
>> > > anyways we can get it out of the sandbox and into a formal
release? I'm
>> > > willing to help out :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > The plugin is stable and running in production. It can
probably be moved
>> > > out of the sandbox whenever we want. At this point, I'm
completely fine with
>> > > pulling it out of the sandbox. I've been using it for a
number of months and
>> > > it is fine.
>> > > >
>> > > > Anyone else adverse to moving it out?
>> > > >
>> > > > Bob, if you have sometime, the move should be as simple as
an svn mv and
>> > > maybe a little build tweaking. The other thing that needs to
be done is to
>> > > figure out the documentation home and move the docs from the
plugin wiki to
>> > > that location. That is if we want to move them.
>> > > >
>> > > > -bp
>> > > >
>> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Convention Plugin Status
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
FYI the convention plugin still has copyright headers in some files
and @Author tags, I will remove them.
musachy
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will be looking at the Convention plugin for the next few days. What
> is broken/missing that is blocking its merge into trunk? I am going
> thru the documentation trying the examples myself, and everything
> seems to be working so far.
>
> musachy
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think doing an mvn -pAll once fixes the parent pom problem.
> >
> > musachy
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Bob Tiernay <bt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Brian,
> > >
> > > Seeing as how I am new to both maven and svn, I'm probably not the best
> > > person for the job. I'm actually trying to build the project now from svn
> > > and I' m running into issues with the missing parent pom.
> > >
> > > Any help getting this into the next release would be greatly appreciated :)
> > >
> > > Also, does this plugin effectively make codebehind and smarturls obsolete?
> > >
> > > Thanks again.
> > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > From: "Brian Pontarelli" <br...@pontarelli.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:20 AM
> > > To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > > Subject: Re: Convention Plugin Status
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Bob Tiernay wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Anyone know what the status of the Convention plugin is? Is there
> > > anyways we can get it out of the sandbox and into a formal release? I'm
> > > willing to help out :)
> > > > >
> > > > The plugin is stable and running in production. It can probably be moved
> > > out of the sandbox whenever we want. At this point, I'm completely fine with
> > > pulling it out of the sandbox. I've been using it for a number of months and
> > > it is fine.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone else adverse to moving it out?
> > > >
> > > > Bob, if you have sometime, the move should be as simple as an svn mv and
> > > maybe a little build tweaking. The other thing that needs to be done is to
> > > figure out the documentation home and move the docs from the plugin wiki to
> > > that location. That is if we want to move them.
> > > >
> > > > -bp
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Convention Plugin Status
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
I will be looking at the Convention plugin for the next few days. What
is broken/missing that is blocking its merge into trunk? I am going
thru the documentation trying the examples myself, and everything
seems to be working so far.
musachy
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think doing an mvn -pAll once fixes the parent pom problem.
>
> musachy
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Bob Tiernay <bt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Brian,
> >
> > Seeing as how I am new to both maven and svn, I'm probably not the best
> > person for the job. I'm actually trying to build the project now from svn
> > and I' m running into issues with the missing parent pom.
> >
> > Any help getting this into the next release would be greatly appreciated :)
> >
> > Also, does this plugin effectively make codebehind and smarturls obsolete?
> >
> > Thanks again.
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "Brian Pontarelli" <br...@pontarelli.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:20 AM
> > To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: Convention Plugin Status
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Bob Tiernay wrote:
> > >
> > > > Anyone know what the status of the Convention plugin is? Is there
> > anyways we can get it out of the sandbox and into a formal release? I'm
> > willing to help out :)
> > > >
> > > The plugin is stable and running in production. It can probably be moved
> > out of the sandbox whenever we want. At this point, I'm completely fine with
> > pulling it out of the sandbox. I've been using it for a number of months and
> > it is fine.
> > >
> > > Anyone else adverse to moving it out?
> > >
> > > Bob, if you have sometime, the move should be as simple as an svn mv and
> > maybe a little build tweaking. The other thing that needs to be done is to
> > figure out the documentation home and move the docs from the plugin wiki to
> > that location. That is if we want to move them.
> > >
> > > -bp
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Convention Plugin Status
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
I think doing an mvn -pAll once fixes the parent pom problem.
musachy
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Bob Tiernay <bt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Seeing as how I am new to both maven and svn, I'm probably not the best
> person for the job. I'm actually trying to build the project now from svn
> and I' m running into issues with the missing parent pom.
>
> Any help getting this into the next release would be greatly appreciated :)
>
> Also, does this plugin effectively make codebehind and smarturls obsolete?
>
> Thanks again.
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Brian Pontarelli" <br...@pontarelli.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:20 AM
> To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Convention Plugin Status
>
>
>
>
> > Bob Tiernay wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone know what the status of the Convention plugin is? Is there
> anyways we can get it out of the sandbox and into a formal release? I'm
> willing to help out :)
> > >
> > The plugin is stable and running in production. It can probably be moved
> out of the sandbox whenever we want. At this point, I'm completely fine with
> pulling it out of the sandbox. I've been using it for a number of months and
> it is fine.
> >
> > Anyone else adverse to moving it out?
> >
> > Bob, if you have sometime, the move should be as simple as an svn mv and
> maybe a little build tweaking. The other thing that needs to be done is to
> figure out the documentation home and move the docs from the plugin wiki to
> that location. That is if we want to move them.
> >
> > -bp
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Convention Plugin Status
Posted by Bob Tiernay <bt...@hotmail.com>.
Hi Brian,
Seeing as how I am new to both maven and svn, I'm probably not the best
person for the job. I'm actually trying to build the project now from svn
and I' m running into issues with the missing parent pom.
Any help getting this into the next release would be greatly appreciated :)
Also, does this plugin effectively make codebehind and smarturls obsolete?
Thanks again.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Brian Pontarelli" <br...@pontarelli.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:20 AM
To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Convention Plugin Status
> Bob Tiernay wrote:
>> Anyone know what the status of the Convention plugin is? Is there anyways
>> we can get it out of the sandbox and into a formal release? I'm willing
>> to help out :)
> The plugin is stable and running in production. It can probably be moved
> out of the sandbox whenever we want. At this point, I'm completely fine
> with pulling it out of the sandbox. I've been using it for a number of
> months and it is fine.
>
> Anyone else adverse to moving it out?
>
> Bob, if you have sometime, the move should be as simple as an svn mv and
> maybe a little build tweaking. The other thing that needs to be done is to
> figure out the documentation home and move the docs from the plugin wiki
> to that location. That is if we want to move them.
>
> -bp
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Convention Plugin Status
Posted by Jeromy Evans <je...@blueskyminds.com.au>.
Brian Pontarelli wrote:
> Bob Tiernay wrote:
>> Anyone know what the status of the Convention plugin is? Is there
>> anyways we can get it out of the sandbox and into a formal release?
>> I'm willing to help out :)
> The plugin is stable and running in production. It can probably be
> moved out of the sandbox whenever we want. At this point, I'm
> completely fine with pulling it out of the sandbox. I've been using it
> for a number of months and it is fine.
>
> Anyone else adverse to moving it out?
Hi Brian, are we going to replace CodeBehind or provide Convention as an
alternative? I prefer the latter, at least for a transitional period,
as the the REST plugin still extends CodeBehind. For the transitional
period we could recommend use of the Convention plugin and plan a
deprecation of CodeBehind. I don't think it's good to offer both
indefinitely.
cheers,
Jeromy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Convention Plugin Status
Posted by Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com>.
Bob Tiernay wrote:
> Anyone know what the status of the Convention plugin is? Is there
> anyways we can get it out of the sandbox and into a formal release?
> I'm willing to help out :)
The plugin is stable and running in production. It can probably be moved
out of the sandbox whenever we want. At this point, I'm completely fine
with pulling it out of the sandbox. I've been using it for a number of
months and it is fine.
Anyone else adverse to moving it out?
Bob, if you have sometime, the move should be as simple as an svn mv and
maybe a little build tweaking. The other thing that needs to be done is
to figure out the documentation home and move the docs from the plugin
wiki to that location. That is if we want to move them.
-bp
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Convention Plugin Status
Posted by Bob Tiernay <bt...@hotmail.com>.
Anyone know what the status of the Convention plugin is? Is there anyways we
can get it out of the sandbox and into a formal release? I'm willing to
help out :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by "matt.payne" <ma...@gmail.com>.
Disregard that post.
Sorry.
Matt
matt.payne wrote:
>
> My build is getting xwork 2.0.4.
>
> This should pull xwork 2.1.x right?
>
>
> -->2008-04-18 10:51:15.033::WARN: failed action2-cleanup
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> com/opensymphony/xwork2/util/logging/LoggerFacto
> ry
> at
> org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.ActionContextCleanUp.<clinit>(ActionCon
> textCleanUp.java:68)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native
> Method)
>
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstruct
> orAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingC
> onstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
> at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:513)
> at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:355)
> at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:308)
>
>
>
> Don Brown-2 wrote:
>>
>> The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
>>
>> No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
>> Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test
>> build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all
>> feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build.
>>
>> Release notes:
>> * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html
>>
>> Distribution:
>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/
>>
>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/
>>
>> We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing
>> code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging
>> issues.
>>
>> Don
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-s2--Test-build-of-2.1.1-available-tp16748800p16763523.html
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by "matt.payne" <ma...@gmail.com>.
My build is getting xwork 2.0.4.
This should pull xwork 2.1.x right?
-->2008-04-18 10:51:15.033::WARN: failed action2-cleanup
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
com/opensymphony/xwork2/util/logging/LoggerFacto
ry
at
org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.ActionContextCleanUp.<clinit>(ActionCon
textCleanUp.java:68)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native
Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstruct
orAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingC
onstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:513)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:355)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:308)
Don Brown-2 wrote:
>
> The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
>
> No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
> Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test
> build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all
> feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build.
>
> Release notes:
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html
>
> Distribution:
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/
>
> We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing
> code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging
> issues.
>
> Don
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-s2--Test-build-of-2.1.1-available-tp16748800p16763494.html
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by Al Sutton <al...@alsutton.com>.
Dave,
The problem is that the S1 plugin does work with older versions of S1, just
not the most recent one, so it's more like if you have a video playing iPod,
and it's not the most recent one, then you're OK.
My problem is really that the whole point of the S1 plugin is to allow S1
code to work with S2, yet it won't work with the most recent version of S1
thats been released even the 1.3.8 has been out for over 6 months and we've
been trying to get everyone to use.
Al.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Newton" <ne...@yahoo.com>
To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
> --- Al Sutton <al...@alsutton.com> wrote:
>> As I see it this would be like Apple making and releasing a new Speaker
>> System today that wouldn't work with the iPod touch, or Microsoft
>> releasing
>> a new version of Office which isn't compatible with Vista,
>
> It'd be more like an iPod speaker system that doesn't work with older
> iPods,
> or Microsoft shipping a version of Office that isn't compatible with an
> older
> version of Office. Which they do.
>
> FWIW I don't have an issue with the S1 plugin not supporting S1.3.8 as
> long
> as it's documented. The other comments I've seen regarding this point,
> however, lead me to believe it's a pretty minor fix. Is that correct?
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com>.
--- Al Sutton <al...@alsutton.com> wrote:
> As I see it this would be like Apple making and releasing a new Speaker
> System today that wouldn't work with the iPod touch, or Microsoft releasing
> a new version of Office which isn't compatible with Vista,
It'd be more like an iPod speaker system that doesn't work with older iPods,
or Microsoft shipping a version of Office that isn't compatible with an older
version of Office. Which they do.
FWIW I don't have an issue with the S1 plugin not supporting S1.3.8 as long
as it's documented. The other comments I've seen regarding this point,
however, lead me to believe it's a pretty minor fix. Is that correct?
Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by Al Sutton <al...@alsutton.com>.
Giovanni,
Like you I am a pure 2.x developer these days, and I would have absolutely
no problem with the S1 plugin being spun off into a separate project, but as
things are I couldn't vote for it being anything more than a test build
because we are shipping something we know doesn't work with the latest
version of one of our own products.
As I see it this would be like Apple making and releasing a new Speaker
System today that wouldn't work with the iPod touch, or Microsoft releasing
a new version of Office which isn't compatible with Vista, whilst it's true
that a majority of people may not care, we know there will be those who do,
and therefore we are knowingly releasing a product which won't work when
people follow our own advise on setting up S1 projects.
If this were any other problem then it wouldn't be such a big problem for me
(e.g. I would still like the dojo plugin to be up to dojo 1.0 or spun off
before a GA release, but we don't tell people to use the latest version of
Dojo), but as the problems are purely of our own making then I believe we
have an obligation to sort them out before saying this is anything more than
a test release.
Al.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Giovanni Azua" <gi...@imc.nl>
To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
> Hi Al,
>
> For me as a pure 2.x user I find the fact that 2.1.1 would be hold back
> only as an alpha just because of supporting a backward-compatibility S1
> plugin is a huge pity to say the least :)
> As a Struts user I personally would expect S1 plugin to have its own
> release cycle away from the S2 release. This way you do not affect the
> presumably lot of users (?) that are developing purely at level 2.x
>
> Best regards,
> Giovanni
>
> Al Sutton wrote:
>> In my view it can only be an alpha build because the S1 plugin is
>> incompatible with latest GA of S1 (1.3.8).
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Don Brown" <mr...@twdata.org>
>> To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:12 PM
>> Subject: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
>>
>>
>>
>>> The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
>>>
>>> No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
>>> Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test
>>> build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all
>>> feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build.
>>>
>>> Release notes:
>>> * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html
>>>
>>> Distribution:
>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/
>>>
>>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/
>>>
>>> We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing
>>> code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging
>>> issues.
>>>
>>> Don
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by Giovanni Azua <gi...@imc.nl>.
Hi Al,
For me as a pure 2.x user I find the fact that 2.1.1 would be hold back
only as an alpha just because of supporting a backward-compatibility S1
plugin is a huge pity to say the least :)
As a Struts user I personally would expect S1 plugin to have its own
release cycle away from the S2 release. This way you do not affect the
presumably lot of users (?) that are developing purely at level 2.x
Best regards,
Giovanni
Al Sutton wrote:
> In my view it can only be an alpha build because the S1 plugin is
> incompatible with latest GA of S1 (1.3.8).
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Brown" <mr...@twdata.org>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:12 PM
> Subject: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
>
>
>
>> The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
>>
>> No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
>> Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test
>> build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all
>> feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build.
>>
>> Release notes:
>> * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html
>>
>> Distribution:
>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/
>>
>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/
>>
>> We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing
>> code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging
>> issues.
>>
>> Don
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by Al Sutton <al...@alsutton.com>.
In my view it can only be an alpha build because the S1 plugin is
incompatible with latest GA of S1 (1.3.8).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Brown" <mr...@twdata.org>
To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:12 PM
Subject: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
> The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
>
> No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
> Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test
> build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all
> feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build.
>
> Release notes:
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html
>
> Distribution:
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/
>
> We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing
> code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging
> issues.
>
> Don
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by Rainer Hermanns <he...@aixcept.de>.
Don,
I just tried the all.zip bundle and I see that some of the new plugins
are missing:
struts2-dojo-plugin-2.1.1.jar
struts2-dwr-plugin-2.1.1.jar
struts2-junit-plugin-2.1.1.jar
struts2-spring-plugin-2.1.1.jar
struts2-testng-plugin-2.1.1.jar
I added the missing jars to the assembly config and tested locally
against 2.1.2-SNAPSHOT.
So I need to revoke my suggestion to publish 2.1.1 as a beta build.
May be we could get out 2.1.2 before JavaOne instead?
cheers,
Rainer
On Apr 17, 2008, at 5:12 PM, Don Brown wrote:
> The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
>
> No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
> Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test
> build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all
> feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build.
>
> Release notes:
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html
>
> Distribution:
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/
>
> We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing
> code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging
> issues.
>
> Don
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by Pedro Herrera <pe...@hotmail.com>.
I´m testing this version (build) in a project and I find no problems. It´s
all working fine !!!
Herrera
Don Brown-2 wrote:
>
> Whoops, that should be:
>
> http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-211.html
>
> Don
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Jeromy Evans
> <je...@blueskyminds.com.au> wrote:
>> Don Brown wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Release notes:
>> > * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Any idea why this published Version 6 of the release notes dated 19 Feb
>> 08
>> instead of Version 11 that was current at 17 Apr 08? Note the incorrect
>> URL
>> also.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-s2--Test-build-of-2.1.1-available-tp16748800p16833557.html
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>.
Whoops, that should be:
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-211.html
Don
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Jeromy Evans
<je...@blueskyminds.com.au> wrote:
> Don Brown wrote:
>
> >
> > The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
> >
> >
> >
> > Release notes:
> > * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html
> >
> >
>
> Any idea why this published Version 6 of the release notes dated 19 Feb 08
> instead of Version 11 that was current at 17 Apr 08? Note the incorrect URL
> also.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by Jeromy Evans <je...@blueskyminds.com.au>.
Don Brown wrote:
> The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
>
>
> Release notes:
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html
>
Any idea why this published Version 6 of the release notes dated 19 Feb
08 instead of Version 11 that was current at 17 Apr 08?
Note the incorrect URL also.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by Giovanni Azua <gi...@imc.nl>.
Hi Don,
I am also testing the 2.1.1 here ... many thanks for pushing the build.
I could not find the dojo plugin in:
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/struts-2.1.1-lib.zip
Then I took it from:
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/org/apache/struts/struts2-dojo-plugin/2.1.1/struts2-dojo-plugin-2.1.1.jar
I assume it is in sync with the zip distribution, is that correct?
Many thanks in advance,
Best regards,
Giovanni
Don Brown wrote:
> The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
>
> No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
> Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test
> build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all
> feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build.
>
> Release notes:
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html
>
> Distribution:
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/
>
> We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing
> code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging
> issues.
>
> Don
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by Rainer Hermanns <he...@apache.org>.
Don,
I tested the current build successfully on my current applications.
I'd suggest to call a vote for a beta release.
With a broader audience we could quickly clean up existing and coming
issues and target a GA release within the next weeks.
Before a GA release some issues in XWork need to be resolved, but these
are already scheduled for the time after JavaOne.
cheers,
Rainer
> The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
>
> No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
> Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test
> build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all
> feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build.
>
> Release notes:
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html
>
> Distribution:
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/
>
> We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing
> code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging
> issues.
>
> Don
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
Rainer Hermanns
aixcept
Mariahilfstrasse 9
52062 Aachen - Germany
w: http://aixcept.de/
t: +49-241-4012247
m: +49-170-3432912
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
RE: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by "Fernandes, Filipe" <Fe...@mtsallstream.com>.
From: Dave Newton
> Please post this to the struts-user list.
>
> Dave
I should have been more clear... I'm not looking for support, just
reporting a problem with the 2.1.1 build. The error I'm seeing is a
result of using the 2.1.1 build using websphere while noting that I
haven't had issues using 2.0.11.1 on the same platform...
>> From: Don Brown [mailto:mrdon@twdata.org]
>> > The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
>> >
>> > No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
>> Struts 2.1.1
>> > has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test build". We
>> welcome any
>> > comments you may have, and will take all feedback into account if a
>> quality vote
>> > is called for this build.
>>
>> I've been watching the list and I just want to say thanks for pushing
>> through to make a build...
>>
>> There's issues with using the <s:form> tag. Pages seem to render
fine
>> without it...
>>
>> Env: RAD7, Websphere 6.1.0.5, Windows XP SP2 No issues when using
>> Struts 2.0.11.1
>>
>> The following is the error message reported on screen with
>> devMode=true when the <s:form> tag is included...
>>
>> Struts Problem Report
>>
>> Struts has detected an unhandled exception:
>>
>> # Messages: java.lang.RuntimeException:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException:
>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException:
>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>
>> File: com/ibm/ws/webcontainer/filter/WebAppFilterChain.java
>> Line number: 166
>>
>>
>> filipe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
RE: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com>.
Please post this to the struts-user list.
Dave
--- "Fernandes, Filipe" <Fe...@mtsallstream.com> wrote:
> From: Don Brown [mailto:mrdon@twdata.org]
> > The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
> >
> > No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
> Struts 2.1.1
> > has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test build". We
> welcome any
> > comments you may have, and will take all feedback into account if a
> quality vote
> > is called for this build.
>
> I've been watching the list and I just want to say thanks for pushing
> through to make a build...
>
> There's issues with using the <s:form> tag. Pages seem to render fine
> without it...
>
> Env: RAD7, Websphere 6.1.0.5, Windows XP SP2
> No issues when using Struts 2.0.11.1
>
> The following is the error message reported on screen with devMode=true
> when the <s:form> tag is included...
>
> Struts Problem Report
>
> Struts has detected an unhandled exception:
>
> # Messages: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException:
> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException:
> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException:
> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>
> File: com/ibm/ws/webcontainer/filter/WebAppFilterChain.java
> Line number: 166
>
>
> filipe
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
RE: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
Posted by "Fernandes, Filipe" <Fe...@mtsallstream.com>.
From: Don Brown [mailto:mrdon@twdata.org]
> The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
>
> No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
Struts 2.1.1
> has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test build". We
welcome any
> comments you may have, and will take all feedback into account if a
quality vote
> is called for this build.
I've been watching the list and I just want to say thanks for pushing
through to make a build...
There's issues with using the <s:form> tag. Pages seem to render fine
without it...
Env: RAD7, Websphere 6.1.0.5, Windows XP SP2
No issues when using Struts 2.0.11.1
The following is the error message reported on screen with devMode=true
when the <s:form> tag is included...
Struts Problem Report
Struts has detected an unhandled exception:
# Messages: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException:
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException:
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException:
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
File: com/ibm/ws/webcontainer/filter/WebAppFilterChain.java
Line number: 166
filipe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org