You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by Paul Smith <ps...@aconex.com> on 2006/02/24 03:49:07 UTC
Chainsaw: New release, vote?
Well, I've committed the last doco bits and pieces for ZeroConf and
Chainsaw, and wouldn't mind a release to get some feedback.
Anyway, I'm obviously +1. If Scott +1's it, is that enough
votes.. ? Do we need a broader vote? We haven't had a vote in the
past, but maybe that's because no-one, including me, ever thought
about it.
cheers,
Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Chainsaw: New release, vote?
Posted by Yoav Shapira <yo...@apache.org>.
Hola,
A vote IS needed with at least 3 +1s, which you now have... Give it a
day, and assuming no -1s arrive, you're all set...
Yoav
On 2/23/06, Paul Smith <ps...@aconex.com> wrote:
> Well, I've committed the last doco bits and pieces for ZeroConf and
> Chainsaw, and wouldn't mind a release to get some feedback.
>
> Anyway, I'm obviously +1. If Scott +1's it, is that enough
> votes.. ? Do we need a broader vote? We haven't had a vote in the
> past, but maybe that's because no-one, including me, ever thought
> about it.
>
> cheers,
>
> Paul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>
--
Yoav Shapira
System Design and Management Fellow
MIT Sloan School of Management
Cambridge, MA, USA
yoavs@computer.org / www.yoavshapira.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Chainsaw: New release, vote?
Posted by Paul Smith <ps...@aconex.com>.
Apologise for the delay in repyling to this
On 24/02/2006, at 4:15 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2006, at 8:49 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
>
>> Well, I've committed the last doco bits and pieces for ZeroConf
>> and Chainsaw, and wouldn't mind a release to get some feedback.
>>
>> Anyway, I'm obviously +1. If Scott +1's it, is that enough
>> votes.. ? Do we need a broader vote? We haven't had a vote in
>> the past, but maybe that's because no-one, including me, ever
>> thought about it.
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Paul
>>
>
> Given the feedback on the recent log4j 1.3 alpha 8, how would you
> characterize the intended release? It production quality to be
> placed on the primary dist and mirrors or alpha, beta or otherwise
> and placed on cvs.apache.org?
>
Chainsaw is still alpha, so this release is just like all the others
we've done, it's an "early access release".
> What versions of log4j would it work with?
It currently ships with alpha 7. however I do local testing against
HEAD all the time to make sure it still works. Once alpha 8 is
released, i'll switch to using that for distribution type releases.
>
> Would you prefer Mark to do a build and place it for review or do
> you intend to do that? A release vote would need a set of bits for
> us to give thumbs up or down.
>
> Sorry not to be up on these things.
I have all the ant bits and pieces setup so that "ant distribution"
in the log4j-chainsaw module will build, package, and ship (via scp)
to the current spot to be deployed. I think just need to move aside
the old distribition and replace it with the new version.
Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Chainsaw: New release, vote?
Posted by Curt Arnold <ca...@apache.org>.
On Feb 23, 2006, at 8:49 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> Well, I've committed the last doco bits and pieces for ZeroConf and
> Chainsaw, and wouldn't mind a release to get some feedback.
>
> Anyway, I'm obviously +1. If Scott +1's it, is that enough
> votes.. ? Do we need a broader vote? We haven't had a vote in
> the past, but maybe that's because no-one, including me, ever
> thought about it.
>
> cheers,
>
> Paul
>
Given the feedback on the recent log4j 1.3 alpha 8, how would you
characterize the intended release? It production quality to be
placed on the primary dist and mirrors or alpha, beta or otherwise
and placed on cvs.apache.org?
What versions of log4j would it work with?
Would you prefer Mark to do a build and place it for review or do you
intend to do that? A release vote would need a set of bits for us to
give thumbs up or down.
Sorry not to be up on these things.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Chainsaw: New release, vote?
Posted by Paul Smith <ps...@aconex.com>.
On 24/02/2006, at 2:58 PM, Jacob Kjome wrote:
>
> Chainsaw is still "alpha" or "beta", no? I don't think any vote is
> needed. However, if a vote is needed, count me as +1.
It'd be nice if there was no 'formal' vote required, but I'm cool
either way. I guess I'll be more diligent in at least giving the
team a heads up with what's actually goiig on, rather than just being
a rogue element deploying things willy nilly....
Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Chainsaw: New release, vote?
Posted by Jacob Kjome <ho...@visi.com>.
Chainsaw is still "alpha" or "beta", no? I don't think any vote is
needed. However, if a vote is needed, count me as +1.
Jake
At 01:49 PM 2/24/2006 +1100, you wrote:
>Well, I've committed the last doco bits and pieces for ZeroConf and
>Chainsaw, and wouldn't mind a release to get some feedback.
>
>Anyway, I'm obviously +1. If Scott +1's it, is that enough
>votes.. ? Do we need a broader vote? We haven't had a vote in the
>past, but maybe that's because no-one, including me, ever thought
>about it.
>
>cheers,
>
>Paul
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org