You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> on 2016/02/29 17:57:35 UTC
Re: Rule updates are too old - 2016-02-29
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, darxus@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> 20160228: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20160228
> 20160228: Spam: 108401, Ham: 191807
Masscheck is spam-starved again, rules updates will be spotty or
nonexistent this week.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maxim IX: Never turn your back on an enemy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
13 days until Albert Einstein's 137th Birthday
Re: Rule updates are too old - 2016-02-29
Posted by Reindl Harald <h....@thelounge.net>.
Am 29.02.2016 um 17:57 schrieb John Hardin:
> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, darxus@chaosreigns.com wrote:
>
>> 20160228: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000:
>> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20160228
>> 20160228: Spam: 108401, Ham: 191807
>
> Masscheck is spam-starved again, rules updates will be spotty or
> nonexistent this week
sounds like 150,000 is too high and should be changed to 150,000
otherwise bad rules with high score like VERY_LONG_REPTO_SHORT_MSG would
take way too long to get fixed