You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@drill.apache.org by Parth Chandra <pa...@apache.org> on 2018/04/18 01:38:06 UTC
Re: gitbox?
Hi Drill devs
If no one has any objections I will open the Apache infra request to move
to gitbox. Once this is setup, committers will be able to merge/commit
without ever leaving github.
Thanks
Parth
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com> wrote:
> My bad... I was trying to go deeper into the specifics of GitBox via
> Google and mostly client related results came up.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe L. Korn [mailto:uwelk@xhochy.com]
> Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:20 AM
> To: dev@drill.apache.org
> Subject: Re: gitbox?
>
> Note that this discussion is about the new Apache server-side Git services
> https://gitbox.apache.org/ and not about any specific client.
>
> We are very happy with it in the Arrow and I can recommend switching to
> any other Apache project as soon as possible.
>
> Uwe
>
> > Am 12.11.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com>:
> >
> > Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's proven
> to be pretty reliable for me for close to a year.
> >
> > My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Parth Chandra [mailto:parthc@apache.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM
> > To: dev <de...@drill.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: gitbox?
> >
> > Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge process. It
> provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the Apache
> Drill mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with the
> Apache master.
> >
> > The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2) run
> the functional tests if doing a batch commit.
> >
> > Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes of
> >> the meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an
> absentee.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:parthc@apache.org]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
> >> To: dev <de...@drill.apache.org>
> >> Subject: Re: gitbox?
> >>
> >> Bumping this thread up.
> >>
> >> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we would
> >> like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
> >>
> >> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
> >>
> >> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
> >>
> >> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process
> document.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vr...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
> >>> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community,
> >>> but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider
> >>> migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give
> >>> committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with all
> >>> the perks that Github
> >> provides.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you,
> >>>
> >>> Vlad
> >>>
> >>
>
Re: gitbox?
Posted by Vlad Rozov <vr...@apache.org>.
All-
Drill was moved to gitbox. Please see update to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16411.
Committers and PMC, please note a one time action required on your side
to enable write access on github.
Thank you,
Vlad
On 4/20/18 15:40, Parth Chandra wrote:
> Created INFRA request: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16411
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Parth Chandra <pa...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Great.
>> Just as an additional clarification, once gitbox is enabled, we will not
>> need to have a remote set up to point to Apache hosted repository (you can
>> still point to the Apache github mirror) as it will no longer be
>> accessible.
>> All commits will be done via github.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Aman Sinha <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, let's go ahead with this. I don't quite recall Vlad's explanations
>>> in the hangout back in October, but I think we were all convinced, so I am
>>> +1.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Arina Yelchiyeva <
>>> arina.yelchiyeva@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks, Parth, that would be really helpful.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:38 AM, Parth Chandra <pa...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Drill devs
>>>>>
>>>>> If no one has any objections I will open the Apache infra request to
>>>> move
>>>>> to gitbox. Once this is setup, committers will be able to merge/commit
>>>>> without ever leaving github.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Parth
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>> My bad... I was trying to go deeper into the specifics of GitBox via
>>>>>> Google and mostly client related results came up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Uwe L. Korn [mailto:uwelk@xhochy.com]
>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:20 AM
>>>>>> To: dev@drill.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: gitbox?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that this discussion is about the new Apache server-side Git
>>>>> services
>>>>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/ and not about any specific client.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are very happy with it in the Arrow and I can recommend
>>> switching to
>>>>>> any other Apache project as soon as possible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Uwe
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 12.11.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's
>>>> proven
>>>>>> to be pretty reliable for me for close to a year.
>>>>>>> My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:parthc@apache.org]
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM
>>>>>>> To: dev <de...@drill.apache.org>
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: gitbox?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge
>>> process.
>>>> It
>>>>>> provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the
>>> Apache
>>>>>> Drill mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with
>>> the
>>>>>> Apache master.
>>>>>>> The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2)
>>> run
>>>>>> the functional tests if doing a batch commit.
>>>>>>> Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkhatua@mapr.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes
>>> of
>>>>>>>> the meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an
>>>>>> absentee.
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:parthc@apache.org]
>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
>>>>>>>> To: dev <de...@drill.apache.org>
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: gitbox?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bumping this thread up.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we
>>>> would
>>>>>>>> like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process
>>>>>> document.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vr...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
>>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
>>>>>>>>> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the
>>> community,
>>>>>>>>> but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider
>>>>>>>>> migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give
>>>>>>>>> committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with
>>> all
>>>>>>>>> the perks that Github
>>>>>>>> provides.
>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Vlad
>>>>>>>>>
>>
Re: gitbox?
Posted by Parth Chandra <pa...@apache.org>.
Created INFRA request: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16411
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Parth Chandra <pa...@apache.org> wrote:
> Great.
> Just as an additional clarification, once gitbox is enabled, we will not
> need to have a remote set up to point to Apache hosted repository (you can
> still point to the Apache github mirror) as it will no longer be
> accessible.
> All commits will be done via github.
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Aman Sinha <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, let's go ahead with this. I don't quite recall Vlad's explanations
>> in the hangout back in October, but I think we were all convinced, so I am
>> +1.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Arina Yelchiyeva <
>> arina.yelchiyeva@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks, Parth, that would be really helpful.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:38 AM, Parth Chandra <pa...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Drill devs
>> > >
>> > > If no one has any objections I will open the Apache infra request to
>> > move
>> > > to gitbox. Once this is setup, committers will be able to merge/commit
>> > > without ever leaving github.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > Parth
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > My bad... I was trying to go deeper into the specifics of GitBox via
>> > > > Google and mostly client related results came up.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks!
>> > > >
>> > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > From: Uwe L. Korn [mailto:uwelk@xhochy.com]
>> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:20 AM
>> > > > To: dev@drill.apache.org
>> > > > Subject: Re: gitbox?
>> > > >
>> > > > Note that this discussion is about the new Apache server-side Git
>> > > services
>> > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/ and not about any specific client.
>> > > >
>> > > > We are very happy with it in the Arrow and I can recommend
>> switching to
>> > > > any other Apache project as soon as possible.
>> > > >
>> > > > Uwe
>> > > >
>> > > > > Am 12.11.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com>:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's
>> > proven
>> > > > to be pretty reliable for me for close to a year.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > From: Parth Chandra [mailto:parthc@apache.org]
>> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM
>> > > > > To: dev <de...@drill.apache.org>
>> > > > > Subject: Re: gitbox?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge
>> process.
>> > It
>> > > > provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the
>> Apache
>> > > > Drill mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with
>> the
>> > > > Apache master.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2)
>> run
>> > > > the functional tests if doing a batch commit.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kkhatua@mapr.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes
>> of
>> > > > >> the meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an
>> > > > absentee.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > > > >> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:parthc@apache.org]
>> > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
>> > > > >> To: dev <de...@drill.apache.org>
>> > > > >> Subject: Re: gitbox?
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Bumping this thread up.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we
>> > would
>> > > > >> like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process
>> > > > document.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vr...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Hi,
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
>> > > > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
>> > > > >>> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the
>> community,
>> > > > >>> but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider
>> > > > >>> migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give
>> > > > >>> committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with
>> all
>> > > > >>> the perks that Github
>> > > > >> provides.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Thank you,
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Vlad
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: gitbox?
Posted by Parth Chandra <pa...@apache.org>.
Great.
Just as an additional clarification, once gitbox is enabled, we will not
need to have a remote set up to point to Apache hosted repository (you can
still point to the Apache github mirror) as it will no longer be
accessible.
All commits will be done via github.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Aman Sinha <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yeah, let's go ahead with this. I don't quite recall Vlad's explanations
> in the hangout back in October, but I think we were all convinced, so I am
> +1.
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Arina Yelchiyeva <
> arina.yelchiyeva@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Parth, that would be really helpful.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:38 AM, Parth Chandra <pa...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Drill devs
> > >
> > > If no one has any objections I will open the Apache infra request to
> > move
> > > to gitbox. Once this is setup, committers will be able to merge/commit
> > > without ever leaving github.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Parth
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > My bad... I was trying to go deeper into the specifics of GitBox via
> > > > Google and mostly client related results came up.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Uwe L. Korn [mailto:uwelk@xhochy.com]
> > > > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:20 AM
> > > > To: dev@drill.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > > >
> > > > Note that this discussion is about the new Apache server-side Git
> > > services
> > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/ and not about any specific client.
> > > >
> > > > We are very happy with it in the Arrow and I can recommend switching
> to
> > > > any other Apache project as soon as possible.
> > > >
> > > > Uwe
> > > >
> > > > > Am 12.11.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's
> > proven
> > > > to be pretty reliable for me for close to a year.
> > > > >
> > > > > My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac.
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Parth Chandra [mailto:parthc@apache.org]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM
> > > > > To: dev <de...@drill.apache.org>
> > > > > Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > > > >
> > > > > Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge
> process.
> > It
> > > > provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the
> Apache
> > > > Drill mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with the
> > > > Apache master.
> > > > >
> > > > > The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2)
> run
> > > > the functional tests if doing a batch commit.
> > > > >
> > > > > Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes of
> > > > >> the meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an
> > > > absentee.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:parthc@apache.org]
> > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
> > > > >> To: dev <de...@drill.apache.org>
> > > > >> Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Bumping this thread up.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we
> > would
> > > > >> like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process
> > > > document.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vr...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Hi,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
> > > > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
> > > > >>> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the
> community,
> > > > >>> but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider
> > > > >>> migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give
> > > > >>> committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with
> all
> > > > >>> the perks that Github
> > > > >> provides.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thank you,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Vlad
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: gitbox?
Posted by Aman Sinha <am...@apache.org>.
Yeah, let's go ahead with this. I don't quite recall Vlad's explanations
in the hangout back in October, but I think we were all convinced, so I am
+1.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Arina Yelchiyeva <
arina.yelchiyeva@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Parth, that would be really helpful.
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:38 AM, Parth Chandra <pa...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Drill devs
> >
> > If no one has any objections I will open the Apache infra request to
> move
> > to gitbox. Once this is setup, committers will be able to merge/commit
> > without ever leaving github.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Parth
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com> wrote:
> >
> > > My bad... I was trying to go deeper into the specifics of GitBox via
> > > Google and mostly client related results came up.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Uwe L. Korn [mailto:uwelk@xhochy.com]
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:20 AM
> > > To: dev@drill.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > >
> > > Note that this discussion is about the new Apache server-side Git
> > services
> > > https://gitbox.apache.org/ and not about any specific client.
> > >
> > > We are very happy with it in the Arrow and I can recommend switching to
> > > any other Apache project as soon as possible.
> > >
> > > Uwe
> > >
> > > > Am 12.11.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com>:
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's
> proven
> > > to be pretty reliable for me for close to a year.
> > > >
> > > > My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Parth Chandra [mailto:parthc@apache.org]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM
> > > > To: dev <de...@drill.apache.org>
> > > > Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > > >
> > > > Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge process.
> It
> > > provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the Apache
> > > Drill mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with the
> > > Apache master.
> > > >
> > > > The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2) run
> > > the functional tests if doing a batch commit.
> > > >
> > > > Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes of
> > > >> the meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an
> > > absentee.
> > > >>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:parthc@apache.org]
> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
> > > >> To: dev <de...@drill.apache.org>
> > > >> Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > > >>
> > > >> Bumping this thread up.
> > > >>
> > > >> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we
> would
> > > >> like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
> > > >>
> > > >> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
> > > >>
> > > >> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process
> > > document.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vr...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
> > > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
> > > >>> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community,
> > > >>> but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider
> > > >>> migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give
> > > >>> committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with all
> > > >>> the perks that Github
> > > >> provides.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thank you,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Vlad
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: gitbox?
Posted by Arina Yelchiyeva <ar...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, Parth, that would be really helpful.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:38 AM, Parth Chandra <pa...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Drill devs
>
> If no one has any objections I will open the Apache infra request to move
> to gitbox. Once this is setup, committers will be able to merge/commit
> without ever leaving github.
>
> Thanks
>
> Parth
>
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com> wrote:
>
> > My bad... I was trying to go deeper into the specifics of GitBox via
> > Google and mostly client related results came up.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Uwe L. Korn [mailto:uwelk@xhochy.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:20 AM
> > To: dev@drill.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: gitbox?
> >
> > Note that this discussion is about the new Apache server-side Git
> services
> > https://gitbox.apache.org/ and not about any specific client.
> >
> > We are very happy with it in the Arrow and I can recommend switching to
> > any other Apache project as soon as possible.
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > > Am 12.11.2017 um 09:08 schrieb Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com>:
> > >
> > > Has anyone tried GitKraken? It's a cross platform client that's proven
> > to be pretty reliable for me for close to a year.
> > >
> > > My concern is that GitBox is exclusive to running on Mac.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Parth Chandra [mailto:parthc@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:52 PM
> > > To: dev <de...@drill.apache.org>
> > > Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > >
> > > Gitbox allows committers to streamline the review and merge process. It
> > provides a single button in github to merge pull requests to the Apache
> > Drill mirror on github. This is then synchronized seamlessly with the
> > Apache master.
> > >
> > > The process would still require a committer to 1) review code, 2) run
> > the functional tests if doing a batch commit.
> > >
> > > Many other Apache projects have already moved to using gitbox.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kunal Khatua <kk...@mapr.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> For those of us that missed the hangout, can we get the minutes of
> > >> the meeting? Would help in deciding on the vote rather than be an
> > absentee.
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Parth Chandra [mailto:parthc@apache.org]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 AM
> > >> To: dev <de...@drill.apache.org>
> > >> Subject: Re: gitbox?
> > >>
> > >> Bumping this thread up.
> > >>
> > >> Vlad brought this up in the hangout today and it sounds like we would
> > >> like to move to Gitbox. Thanks Vlad for the patient explanations!
> > >>
> > >> Committers, let's use this thread to vote on the the suggestion.
> > >>
> > >> I'm +1 on moving to gitbox.
> > >>
> > >> Also, I can work with Vlad and Paul on updating the merge process
> > document.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vlad Rozov <vr...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> As I am new to Drill, I don't know if migration from "Git WiP" (
> > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org) to "Github Dual Master" (
> > >>> https://gitbox.apache.org) was already discussed by the community,
> > >>> but from my Apache Apex experience I would recommend to consider
> > >>> migrating Drill ASF repos to the gitbox. Such move will give
> > >>> committers write access to the Drill repository on Github with all
> > >>> the perks that Github
> > >> provides.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank you,
> > >>>
> > >>> Vlad
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>