You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to common-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Kengo Seki (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/07/30 16:57:04 UTC

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12285) Reorganize test-patch footer table

Kengo Seki created HADOOP-12285:
-----------------------------------

             Summary: Reorganize test-patch footer table
                 Key: HADOOP-12285
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12285
             Project: Hadoop Common
          Issue Type: Sub-task
          Components: yetus
            Reporter: Kengo Seki


In response to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12266?focusedCommentId=14647672&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14647672

{quote}
* when further information is needed, we often publish that in the footer as well, and having all of these versions published in the footer makes those hard to find
* are we better off actually adding a fourth table just for versions and other operating information? or just exercising better control over the footer table to force versions lower than logs? in code, versions could be in a separate table but in display one table
{quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)