You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@arrow.apache.org by "Wes McKinney (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/09/10 15:20:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-3408) [C++] Add option to CSV reader to
dictionary encode individual columns or all string / binary columns
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-3408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16926724#comment-16926724 ]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-3408:
-------------------------------------
Nope. That's what ARROW-3144 was about, so each chunk can have a different dictionary
> [C++] Add option to CSV reader to dictionary encode individual columns or all string / binary columns
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-3408
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-3408
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: C++
> Reporter: Wes McKinney
> Priority: Major
> Labels: csv, dataset, pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> For many datasets, dictionary encoding everything can result in drastically lower memory usage and subsequently better performance in doing analytics
> One difficulty of dictionary encoding in multithreaded conversions is that ideally you end up with one dictionary at the end. So you have two options:
> * Implement a concurrent hashing scheme -- for low cardinality dictionaries, the overhead associated with mutex contention will not be meaningful, for high cardinality it can be more of a problem
> * Hash each chunk separately, then normalize at the end
> My guess is that a crude concurrent hash table with a mutex to protect mutations and resizes is going to outperform the latter
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)