You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ozone.apache.org by "Chung En Lee (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2025/10/21 20:55:05 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (HDDS-11247) Clean up TestContainerReportHandling
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Chung En Lee updated HDDS-11247:
--------------------------------
Target Version/s: 2.2.0
2.2.0 (was: 2.1.0)
<<Bulk update>>
Apache Ozone 2.1.0 release is in progress. I'm updating all unresolved jiras targeting 2.1.0 to retarget 2.2.0.
> Clean up TestContainerReportHandling
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-11247
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11247
> Project: Apache Ozone
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: test
> Reporter: Siddhant Sangwan
> Assignee: Chu Cheng Li
> Priority: Major
>
> TestContainerReportHandling and TestContainerReportHandlingWithHA are integration tests. They're related to each other and should ideally be present in the same file. However for reasons that are not clear yet, having them in the same file makes the non-HA test case fail with:
> {code}
> 2024-07-26 11:50:20,864 [main] WARN ha.SCMHANodeDetails (SCMHANodeDetails.java:validateSCMHAConfig(180)) - Default/Configured value of config ozone.scm.ratis.enable conflicts with the expected value. Default/Configured: true. Expected: false. Falling back to the expected value. Current State of SCM: SCM is running without Ratis. Ratis SCM -> Non Ratis SCM is not supported.
> org.apache.hadoop.hdds.conf.ConfigurationException: Setting conflicting Default Configs old default Value: true New Default Value:false
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdds.conf.DefaultConfigManager.setConfigValue(DefaultConfigManager.java:40)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.ha.SCMHANodeDetails.validateSCMHAConfig(SCMHANodeDetails.java:189)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.ha.SCMHANodeDetails.loadSCMHAConfig(SCMHANodeDetails.java:208)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.server.StorageContainerManager.<init>(StorageContainerManager.java:368)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.server.StorageContainerManager.createSCM(StorageContainerManager.java:616)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.HddsTestUtils.getScmSimple(HddsTestUtils.java:588)
> at org.apache.hadoop.ozone.MiniOzoneClusterImpl$Builder.createSCM(MiniOzoneClusterImpl.java:625)
> at org.apache.hadoop.ozone.MiniOzoneClusterImpl$Builder.createAndStartSingleSCM(MiniOzoneClusterImpl.java:608)
> at org.apache.hadoop.ozone.MiniOzoneClusterImpl$Builder.build(MiniOzoneClusterImpl.java:534)
> at org.apache.hadoop.ozone.container.TestContainerReportHandling.newCluster(TestContainerReportHandling.java:179)
> at org.apache.hadoop.ozone.container.TestContainerReportHandling.testDeletingContainerTransitionsToClosedWhenNonEmptyReplicaIsReported(TestContainerReportHandling.java:82)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1259)
> at java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1259)
> {code}
> It's something to do with the scm version file.
> This jira is to investigate this issue. We can also delete the logic that explicitly cleans up mini ozone cluster tests dirs and resources (cluster shutdown should already handle that).
> It's also possible that a separate test case for non-HA isn't needed and the HA test case covers it, but I think it's better to have different, explicit tests for all cases.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@ozone.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@ozone.apache.org