You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by "Tuomas Kiviaho (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/08/05 06:48:11 UTC
[jira] [Created] (FELIX-4594) Propagation from dependencies
overwrites service properties
Tuomas Kiviaho created FELIX-4594:
-------------------------------------
Summary: Propagation from dependencies overwrites service properties
Key: FELIX-4594
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4594
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Dependency Manager
Affects Versions: dependencymanager.runtime-3.2.0
Reporter: Tuomas Kiviaho
Priority: Blocker
ComponentImpl#calculateServiceProperties() method overwrites implicitly defined service properties those coming from propagated dependencies.
{code}
addTo(properties, m_serviceProperties);
for (int i = 0; i < m_dependencies.size(); i++) {
Dependency d = (Dependency) m_dependencies.get(i);
if (d.isPropagated() && d.isAvailable()) {
Dictionary dict = d.getProperties();
addTo(properties, dict);
}
}
{code}
I think that it would be more appropriate to deal clashes so that service properties would be added AFTER dependency propagation inverting the overwrite. Traversal of dependencies should in my opinion be inverted as well.
{code}
for (int i = m_dependencies.size() - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
Dependency d = (Dependency) m_dependencies.get(i);
if (d.isPropagated() && d.isAvailable()) {
Dictionary dict = d.getProperties();
addTo(properties, dict);
}
}
addTo(properties, m_serviceProperties);
{code}
My use case involves Service PID which is currently overwritten by propagated dependencies. I'd turn off propagation but @AdapterService (and @AspectService) annotation is missing such option that @BundleAdapterService is providing. I can't work around the issue (without patching) while using annotations so I increased the priority accordingly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)