You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@tapestry.apache.org by "Olivier Le Merdy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/09/06 11:31:14 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (TAP5-2172) ComponentClassResolver does not resolve logical name to the more intuitive component

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Olivier Le Merdy updated TAP5-2172:
-----------------------------------

    Attachment: bug-sample.zip

Bug sample project
                
> ComponentClassResolver does not resolve logical name to the more intuitive component
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAP5-2172
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2172
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tapestry-core
>    Affects Versions: 5.3.7
>            Reporter: Olivier Le Merdy
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: bug-sample.zip
>
>
> ComponentClassResolver does not always resolve components the more intuitive way.
> See attached sample project for demonstration purposes but given a set of three components: "foo/Bar", "foo/FooBar" and "foo/BarFoo", the logical name "foo/bar" will be resolved to "foo/FooBar" component instead of the more intuitive "foo/Bar".
> The workaround is to rename our components but, given the stripping can happen at multiple package levels, it is sometimes hard to predict (and debug) what is happening, e.g.: "layout/detail/Section" logical name will resolve primarily "layout/detail/SectionLayout" component instead of "layout/detail/Section" component.
> Looking at ComponentClassResolverImpl implementation, the component name cache is filled following classpath alphabetical order, overriding any previous entry found.
> Could it be possible to privilege a component when its unstripped name exactly match its logical name?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira