Re: [oscar] Re: R4 Road map?

[francesco furfari <fr...@isti.cnr.it>]

Dear Didier,
great! I suspected you was already involved in doing it ;)
I think it will take more time to us to be involved in R4.
But if you have already started to work on it perhaps we can more easily 
to approach R4 and support you, at least in testing the code.
We can talk how next week in Paris.

bests
francesco

Didier Donsez wrote:
> francesco furfari a écrit :
> 
>> Hi all,
>> a pragmatic approach ...
>> is anybody planning to implement the Event Admin service?
> 
> 
> I have done quickly a version of the Event Admin Service
> by following the R4 draft
> But I don't know if I can publish it before the official R4 release !
> 
> This version implements
> * 114.7.2 Asynchronous Event Delivery
> * 114.6.2 OSGi Events
> but not
> * 114.7.1 Synchronous Event Delivery
> * 114.8.2 Dealing with Stalled Handlers
> * 114.10 Security
> 
> Moreover, handlers are notified by only one thread : a pool of threads 
> should be added !
> 
> I provides also a sample for demo and I test it on Oscar 1.0.5 !
> 
> Didier
> 
>> we are interested because now the UPnP Base Driver depends on it.
>>
>> francesco
>>
>>
>> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>
>>> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>>
>>>> Richard,
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>> I am not saying that we are not interested in spec compliance, since I
>>>>> think we would all like this. My point is that we have limited
>>>>> resources
>>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Felix is now a community project, so one focus should be on community
>>>> building and actively growing the list of people contributing to the
>>>> project.  Putting together something like a matrix of features 
>>>> needed would
>>>> help to in the process.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Agreed. Which is how this whole thread got started. It was suggested 
>>> that I create a road map of features that need to be implemented. I 
>>> only asked if I should differentiate between spec and non-spec 
>>> issues. Whew! :-D
>>>
>>> I think BJ is a trouble maker. ;-)
>>>
>>>> We have people from IBM and elsewhere expressing
>>>> interest.  We should make it possible for them to participate with code
>>>> contributions.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I will let IBM'ers field this.
>>>
>>> -> richard
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> --
> You receive this message as a subscriber of the oscar@objectweb.org mailing list.
> To unsubscribe: mailto:oscar-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
> For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
> ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws